Dataset Information

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation versus positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has been shown to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) effectively. The aim of this study was to compare HNS with positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment regarding outcome parameters: (1) sleepiness, (2) apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and (3) effectiveness.

Methods

Propensity score matching with nearest neighbor algorithm was used to compare outcomes of HNS and PAP therapy in a real-world setting. Data were collected at baseline and 12 months after initiating OSA treatment including demographics, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), AHI, and objective adherence data. To account for overall treatment efficacy, the mean disease alleviation (MDA) was calculated.

Results

Of 227 patients who received treatment consecutively, 126 could be matched 1:1 with regard to age, body mass index, and AHI. After matching, no statistically significant differences between the groups were found. A clinically important symptom improvement was seen at 12 months in both cohorts, though there was a greater difference in ESS improvement in patients treated with HNS (8.0 ± 5.1 points vs. 3.9 ± 6.8 points; p = 0.042). In both groups, mean posttreatment AHI was significantly reduced (HNS: 8.1 ± 6.3/h; PAP: 6.6 ± 8.0/h; p < 0.001). Adherence after 12 months among patients treated with HNS was higher than in those receiving PAP therapy (5.0 ± 2.6 h/night; 4.0 ± 2.1 h/night) but not with statistical significance. Overall effectiveness calculated with the MDA was 59% in patients treated with HNS compared to 51% receiving PAP.

Conclusion

Patients treated with HNS therapy had significantly greater improvements in daytime sleepiness compared to PAP therapy, while the mean reduction of AHI and overall effectiveness were comparable for both treatments.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT03756805.

SUBMITTER: Heiser C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10212798 | biostudies-literature | 2023 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation versus positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea.

Heiser Clemens C Steffen Armin A Strollo Patrick J PJ Giaie-Miniet Claire C Vanderveken Olivier M OM Hofauer Benedikt B

Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung 20220702 2

<h4>Purpose</h4>Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has been shown to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) effectively. The aim of this study was to compare HNS with positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment regarding outcome parameters: (1) sleepiness, (2) apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and (3) effectiveness.<h4>Methods</h4>Propensity score matching with nearest neighbor algorithm was used to compare outcomes of HNS and PAP therapy in a real-world setting. Data were collected at baseline and 12 mont ...[more]

PMID: 35779166

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceRecent retrospective hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) outcomes data suggest that patients with low therapeutic positive airway pressure (PAP) levels achieve greater success than patients with high therapeutic PAP levels.ObjectiveTo examine the use of therapeutic nasal PAP levels at the soft palate in predicting the outcomes of HGNS for patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective cohort study used drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) to evaluate the predictive capacity of therapeutic PAP levels in HGNS outcomes. In an academic sleep surgery center, 27 consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent DISE before implantation of an HGNS device were evaluated. The study was conducted from May 1, 2018, to June 26, 2019.ExposuresPositive airway pressure delivered through a nasal mask during DISE.Main outcomes and measuresImprovement in apnea-hypopnea index as measured from full-night preoperative and postoperative efficacy studies.ResultsTwenty-seven patients met all inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) age was 62.0 (14.4) years, 14 participants were men (51.9%), and mean body mass index was 28.1 (4.0). Responders to HGNS therapy (n = 18) had significantly lower mean (SD) palatal opening pressure compared with nonresponders (n = 9) (5.0 [2.8] vs 9.2 [3.7] cm H2O, respectively; mean difference, -4.2; 95% CI, -6.8 to -1.6 cm H2O). After adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index, the mean palatal opening pressure value for the responders remained 3.5 cm H2O lower (95% CI, -6.7 to -0.4 cm H2O) than that of nonresponders. A palatal opening pressure cutoff level less than 8 cm H2O demonstrated a positive predictive value of 82.4%; sensitivity, 77.8%; and specificity, 66.7%.Conclusions and relevanceIn this small prospective cohort study, therapeutic nasal PAP levels during DISE differed significantly between responder and nonresponders to HGNS. Because DISE represents a mandatory, relatively standardized diagnostic tool for HGNS candidacy, the use of therapeutic nasal PAP through DISE can be broadly implemented and studied across multiple centers to possibly improve patient selection for HGNS.

Project description:ImportanceHypoglossal nerve stimulation is a treatment option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea unable to tolerate continuous positive airway pressure. This study evaluates demographic factors that may be associated with greater improvements in postoperative outcomes of interest.ObjectiveTo examine the association of hypoglossal nerve stimulation with obstructive sleep apnea severity, daytime sleepiness, and sleep-related quality of life.Design, setting, and participantsPatient-level data were pooled from 3 prospective cohorts and 1 retrospective observational cohort comprising 584 adults with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea unable to tolerate or benefit from continuous positive airway pressure. The data were gathered from the Stimulation Therapy for Apnea Reduction Trial; a postmarket approval study conducted in Germany; the multicenter, international Adherence and Outcome of Upper Airway Stimulation for OSA Registry; and a retrospective cohort study from 2 sites in the United States.ExposureHypoglossal nerve stimulation.Main outcomes and measuresSeverity of obstructive sleep apnea was the primary outcome. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (<5, normal; 5-15, mild; 15-30, moderate, and >30, severe) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (range, 0-24; score >10 indicates pathologic sleepiness) outcomes were available at 2 to 6 months from 2 cohorts (n = 398), at 12 months from 1 cohort (n = 126), and at both times from 1 cohort (n = 60). Sleep-related quality of life and oxygen saturation nadir data were collected where available. Linear mixed-effects models were constructed to examine associations between clinical variables and reported postoperative outcomes at 6 and 12 months with study included as a random effect.ResultsOf the 584 patients included in the study, 472 were men (80.8%); mean (SD) age was 58.5 (11.0) years. Greater improvement in the postoperative AHI was associated with a higher preoperative AHI (-0.74 events/h; 95% CI, -0.82 to -0.67), older patient age (-0.10 events/h; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.00), and lower body mass index (0.52; 95% CI, 0.22-0.83). After adjusting for these variables and considering all patients in the analysis, the AHI was statistically higher at 12 months than at 6 months (3.24 events/h; 95% CI, 1.67-4.82 events/h).Conclusions and relevanceHypoglossal nerve stimulation demonstrated clinically significant improvements in obstructive sleep apnea severity, daytime sleepiness, and sleep-related quality of life in this pooled cohort of patient-level results. Age, body mass index, and preoperative AHI appeared to be associated with treatment outcomes, and these variables may explain some of the difference between 2- to 6-month and 12-month outcomes.

Project description:ImportanceHypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) and positive airway pressure (PAP) have been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, to our knowledge, there are no data that compare change in PROs between HNS and PAP or that indicate whether HNS improves comorbid insomnia or depression in the long term.ObjectivesTo determine whether HNS is associated with improvements in patient-reported sleepiness, insomnia, and depression in the long term and to compare the respective associations of HNS and PAP with improved PROs.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study used data from patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic for OSA. Participants received either HNS (referred sample) from November 1, 2015, to September 31, 2018, or PAP (previous cohort) from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014, for OSA. Patients were matched 3:1 for PAP:HNS based on age, body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), sex, and apnea hypopnea index (AHI). Data were collected at baseline and at prespecified follow-up points. Data were analyzed from March 26, 2020, to September 9, 2021.ExposuresTreatment with HNS vs PAP.Main outcomes and measuresData collected included AHI and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; depression) scores.ResultsAmong 85 patients receiving HNS (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [9.5] years; 59 men [69.4%]; 77 White patients [90.6%]; mean [SD] BMI, 28.8 [3.1]), compared with 217 matched patients receiving PAP (mean [SD] age, 62.1 [9.9] years; 157 men [72.4%]; 173 White patients [81.2%]; mean [SD] BMI, 29.5 [3.1]) included in the analysis, significant improvements were seen in PHQ-9 scores for HNS vs PAP (least square means, -4.06 [95% CI, -5.34 to -2.79] vs -2.58 [95% CI, -3.35 to -1.82]; mean difference, -1.48 [95% CI, -2.78 to -0.19]) with comparable improvements in ESS, FOSQ, and ISI scores. Clinically meaningful differences were observed in 42 of 65 HNS group patients (64.6%) vs 118 PAP group patients (54.5%) for ESS scores, 29 of 49 HNS group patients (59.2%) vs 67 of 217 PAP group patients (30.9%) for FOSQ scores, 14 of 48 HNS group patients (29.2%) vs 53 of 217 PAP group patients (24.4%) for PHQ-9 scores, and 23 of 49 HNS group patients (46.9%) vs 79 of 217 PAP group patients (36.4%) for ISI scores. At the 1-year post-HNS assessment, meaningful improvements were seen in 17 of 28 patients (60.7%) for ESS scores, 11 of 20 patients (55.0%) for FOSQ scores, 7 of 23 patients (30.4%) for PHQ-9 scores, and 11 of 25 patients (44.0%) for ISI scores.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of patients with OSA, sustained improvements in PROs were observed 1 year after HNS and were comparable to those for PAP at 3 months. These findings suggest that HNS is a viable treatment for improving insomnia and depression in patients with OSA.

Dataset Information

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation versus positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Publications

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation versus positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets