Dataset Information

U.S. Trends in Registration for Medical Cannabis and Reasons for Use From 2016 to 2020 : An Observational Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cannabis policy liberalization has increased cannabis availability for medical or recreational purposes. Up-to-date trends in medical cannabis licensure can inform clinical policy and care.

Objective

To describe recent trends in medical cannabis licensure in the United States.

Design

Ecological study with repeated measures.

Setting

State registry data via state reports and data requests on medical cannabis licensure from 2016 to 2020.

Participants

Medical cannabis patients (persons with medical cannabis licenses) in the United States.

Measurements

Total patient volume, patients per 10 000 of total population, and patient-reported qualifying conditions (that is, symptoms or conditions qualifying patients for licensure)-including whether these symptoms align with current therapeutic evidence of cannabis-cannabinoid efficacy.

Results

In 2020, 26 states and Washington, DC reported patient numbers, and 19 states reported patient-reported qualifying conditions. Total enrolled patients increased approximately 4.5-fold from 678 408 in 2016 to 2 974 433 in 2020. Patients per 10 000 total population generally increased from 2016 to 2020, most dramatically in Oklahoma (927.1 patients per 10 000 population). However, enrollment increased in states without recreational legalization (that is, medical-only states), whereas enrollment decreased in 5 of 7 with recreational legalization (that is, recreational states). In 2020, 68.2% of patient-reported qualifying conditions had substantial or conclusive evidence of therapeutic value versus 84.6% in 2016. Chronic pain was the most common patient-reported qualifying condition in 2020 (60.6%), followed by posttraumatic stress disorder (10.6%).

Limitation

Missing state data; lack of rationale for discontinuing medical cannabis licensure.

Conclusion

Enrollment in medical cannabis programs approximately increased 4.5-fold from 2016 to 2020, although enrollment decreased in recreational states. Use for conditions or symptoms without a strong evidence basis increased from 15.4% (2016) to 31.8% (2020). Thoughtful regulatory and clinical strategies are needed to effectively manage this rapidly changing landscape.

Primary funding source

National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

SUBMITTER: Boehnke KF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10233658 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

U.S. Trends in Registration for Medical Cannabis and Reasons for Use From 2016 to 2020 : An Observational Study.

Boehnke Kevin F KF Dean Owen O Haffajee Rebecca L RL Hosanagar Avinash A

Annals of internal medicine 20220614 7

<h4>Background</h4>Cannabis policy liberalization has increased cannabis availability for medical or recreational purposes. Up-to-date trends in medical cannabis licensure can inform clinical policy and care.<h4>Objective</h4>To describe recent trends in medical cannabis licensure in the United States.<h4>Design</h4>Ecological study with repeated measures.<h4>Setting</h4>State registry data via state reports and data requests on medical cannabis licensure from 2016 to 2020.<h4>Participants</h4>M ...[more]

PMID: 35696691

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAs medical cannabis availability increases, up-to-date trends in medical cannabis licensure can inform clinical policy and care.ObjectiveTo describe current trends in medical cannabis licensure in the United States.DesignEcological study with repeated measures.SettingPublicly available state registry data from 2020 to 2022.ParticipantsPeople with medical cannabis licenses and clinicians authorizing cannabis licenses in the United States.MeasurementsTotal patient volume and prevalence per 10 000 persons in the total population, symptoms or conditions qualifying patients for licensure (that is, patient-reported qualifying conditions), and number of authorizing clinicians.ResultsIn 2022, of 39 jurisdictions allowing medical cannabis use, 34 reported patient numbers, 19 reported patient-reported qualifying conditions, and 29 reported authorizing clinician numbers. Enrolled patients increased 33.3% from 2020 (3 099 096) to 2022 (4 132 098), with a corresponding 23.0% increase in the population prevalence of patients (175.0 per 10 000 in 2020 to 215.2 per 10 000 in 2022). However, 13 of 15 jurisdictions with nonmedical adult-use laws had decreased enrollment from 2020 to 2022. The proportion of patient-reported qualifying conditions with substantial or conclusive evidence of therapeutic value decreased from 70.4% (2020) to 53.8% (2022). Chronic pain was the most common patient-reported qualifying condition in 2022 (48.4%), followed by anxiety (14.2%) and posttraumatic stress disorder (13.0%). In 2022, the United States had 29 500 authorizing clinicians (7.7 per 1000 patients), 53.5% of whom were physicians. The most common specialties reported were internal or family medicine (63.4%), physical medicine and rehabilitation (9.1%), and anesthesia or pain (7.9%).LimitationMissing data (for example, from California), descriptive analysis, lack of information on individual use patterns, and changing evidence base.ConclusionEnrollment in medical cannabis programs increased overall but generally decreased in jurisdictions with nonmedical adult-use laws. Use for conditions or symptoms without a strong evidence basis continues to increase. Given these trends, more research is needed to better understand the risks and benefits of medical cannabis.Primary funding sourceNational Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Project description:IntroductionMedical cannabis (MC) is available upon certification for one of several qualifying conditions in Florida, USA. Previous studies suggested that some people seek cannabis for medical conditions/symptoms beyond those legally permitted. However, data remain limited on patient motives for seeking MC and their experiences around its impact on their health. We aimed to compare reported qualifying conditions for MC certification with the most frequently self-reported reasons for using MC while assessing the alignment between the two and understanding the perceived impacts of MC on self-reported conditions and symptoms.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using survey data from the Medical Marijuana and Me (M3) Data Bank of individuals receiving MC in Florida, USA, in 2022. Participants were recruited via convenience sampling from nine MC clinics/clinic networks across Florida and were asked to fill out an online survey. The study measures included sociodemographic variables, self-reported health conditions, self-reported main reasons for using MC, self-reported qualifying conditions for MC certification, and self-reported perceived impact of MC on health conditions. We cross-tabulated reported qualifying conditions and reasons for MC use and reported the perceived impact per condition.ResultsA total of 632 participants completed the survey, of whom 396 (62.66%) were female and 471 (74.53%) were non-Hispanic white. The median (IQR) age was 45 (35, 58). The most frequently reported qualifying conditions were post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (n = 187, 29.59%), a condition not on the qualifying conditions list (n = 175, 27.69%), medical conditions of the same kind/comparable to those listed (n = 140, 22.15%), and chronic nonmalignant pain (n = 62, 25.63%). The top ten most frequently reported reasons for using MC were anxiety (n = 383, 60.60%), chronic pain (n = 278, 43.99%), depression (n = 252, 39.87%), PTSD (n = 220, 34.81%), headaches/migraine (n = 134, 21.20%), fibromyalgia (n = 67, 10.60%), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (n = 59, 9.34%), bipolar disorder (n = 53, 8.39%), high blood pressure (n = 41, 6.49%), and cancer (n = 18,2.85%). Of respondents, 70-90% with each qualifying condition reported it as one of the main reasons for using MC. Most respondents reported improvement of anxiety (n = 430/451, 95.34%), depression (n = 381/392, 97.20%), chronic pain (n = 305/310, 98.39%), insomnia/sleeping problems (n = 225/295, 86.44%), PTSD (n = 247/270, 91.48%), headaches/migraine (n = 172/218, 78.90%), ADHD (n = 82/123, 66.67%), bipolar disorder (n = 79/89, 88.76%), and fibromyalgia (n = 77/82, 93.90%). Most respondents were unsure/reported no change in blood pressure (n = 93/162, 57.41%). A small percentage reported perceived worsening impacts on their conditions.ConclusionQualifying conditions and self-reported reasons for using MC aligned for most respondents. Yet, a notable proportion of respondents sought MC for broader treatment effects beyond those delineated by the officially recognized qualifying conditions in Florida, USA. Most patients perceived positive effects, including those with limited available evidence on efficacy.

Project description:OBJECTIVES:To analyse prospective versus retrospective trial registration trends on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) and to evaluate the reasons for non-compliance with prospective registration. DESIGN:Part 1: Descriptive analysis of trial registration trends from 2006 to 2015. Part 2: Online registrant survey. PARTICIPANTS:Part 1: All interventional trials registered on ANZCTR from 2006 to 2015. Part 2: Random sample of those who had retrospectively registered a trial on ANZCTR between 2010 and 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Part 1: Proportion of prospective versus retrospective clinical trial registrations (ie, registration before versus after enrolment of the first participant) on the ANZCTR overall and by various key metrics, such as sponsor, funder, recruitment country and sample size. Part 2: Reasons for non-compliance with prospective registration and perceived usefulness of various proposed mechanisms to improve prospective registration compliance. RESULTS:Part 1: Analysis of the complete dataset of 9450 trials revealed that compliance with prospective registration increased from 48% (216 out of 446 trials) in 2006 to 63% (723/1148) in 2012 and has since plateaued at around 64%. Patterns of compliance were relatively consistent across sponsor and funder types (industry vs non-industry), type of intervention (drug vs non-drug) and size of trial (n<100, 100-500, >500). However, primary sponsors from Australia/New Zealand were almost twice as likely to register prospectively (62%; 4613/7452) compared with sponsors from other countries with a WHO Network Registry (35%; 377/1084) or sponsors from countries without a WHO Registry (29%; 230/781). Part 2: The majority (56%; 84/149) of survey respondents cited lack of awareness as a reason for not registering their study prospectively. Seventy-four per cent (111/149) stated that linking registration to ethics approval would facilitate prospective registration. CONCLUSIONS:Despite some progress, compliance with prospective registration remains suboptimal. Linking registration to ethics approval was the favoured strategy among those sampled for improving compliance.

Project description:BackgroundAustralia has had a framework for legal medicinal cannabis since 2016, yet prior online surveys in 2016 and 2018 indicated that most consumers continued to use illicit medical cannabis products. Regulatory data indicate an increase in the prescription of medicinal cannabis since 2019, and this survey examines consumer experiences of prescribed and illicit medical cannabis (MC) use in Australia.MethodsA cross-sectional anonymous online survey was administered September 2020 to January 2021. Recruitment via social media, professional and consumer forums, and medical practices. Participant eligibility: ≥ 18 years; used a cannabis product for self-identified medical reason(s) in the past year, and resident in Australia. Outcome measures included consumer characteristics, conditions treated, source and patterns of MC use, and perspectives on accessing MC.ResultsOf the 1600 participants (mean age 46.4 ± 14.3 years, 53% male), 62.4% (n = 999) reported using only illicit and 37.6% (n = 601) used prescribed MC in the past year. MC was used on a median of 28 (IQR: 12, 28) of the past 28 days and cost $AUD 74 ± 72 weekly (median = $40, IQR: $7, $100). Prescribed participants were more likely to treat pain conditions than those using illicit MC (52% v 40%, OR = 1.7, 1.3-2.1) and less likely to treat sleep conditions (6% v 11%, OR = 0.5, 0.3-0.8), with mental health conditions also a common indication in both groups (26%, 31%). Prescribed MC was consumed predominately by oral routes (72%), whereas illicit MC was most commonly smoked (41%). Prescribed MC was 'mainly THC' (26%), 'equal THC/CBD' (40%), 'mainly CBD' (31%) and 'uncertain' (3%), while 34% of those using illicit MC were 'uncertain' of the cannabinoid profile. Cost and difficulties finding medical practitioners to prescribe remain significant barriers to accessing prescribed MC, and few (10.8%) described the existing model for accessing prescribed MC as 'straightforward or easy'.ConclusionsThere has been a notable shift from illicit to prescribed MC by many consumers compared to prior surveys. Consumers using prescribed MC reported a range of advantages compared to illicit MC, including safer routes of administration, and greater certainty regarding access and composition of products.

Project description:ObjectiveIn the United States, adult cannabis use has increased over time, but less information is available on time trends in cannabis use disorder. The authors used Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data to examine change over time in cannabis use disorder diagnoses among veterans, an important population subgroup, and whether such trends differ by age group (<35 years, 35-64 years, ≥65 years), sex, or race/ethnicity.MethodsVHA electronic health records from 2005 to 2019 (range of Ns per year, 4,403,027-5,797,240) were used to identify the percentage of VHA patients seen each year with a cannabis use disorder diagnosis (ICD-9-CM, January 1, 2005-September 30, 2015; ICD-10-CM, October 1, 2015-December 31, 2019). Trends in cannabis use disorder diagnoses were examined by age and by race/ethnicity and sex within age groups. Given the transition in ICD coding, differences in trends were tested within two periods: 2005-2014 (ICD-9-CM) and 2016-2019 (ICD-10-CM).ResultsIn 2005, the percentages of VHA patients diagnosed with cannabis use disorder in the <35, 35-64, and ≥65 year age groups were 1.70%, 1.59%, and 0.03%, respectively; by 2019, the percentages had increased to 4.84%, 2.86%, and 0.74%, respectively. Although the prevalence of cannabis use disorder was consistently higher among males than females, between 2016 and 2019, the prevalence increased more among females than males in the <35 year group. Black patients had a consistently higher prevalence of cannabis use disorder than other racial/ethnic groups, and increases were greater among Black than White patients in the <35 year group in both periods.ConclusionsSince 2005, diagnoses of cannabis use disorder have increased substantially among VHA patients, as they have in the general population and other patient populations. Possible explanations warranting investigation include decreasing perception of risk, changing laws, increasing cannabis potency, stressors related to growing socioeconomic inequality, and use of cannabis to self-treat pain. Clinicians and the public should be educated about the increases in cannabis use disorder in general in the United States, including among patients treated at the VHA.

Dataset Information

U.S. Trends in Registration for Medical Cannabis and Reasons for Use From 2016 to 2020 : An Observational Study.

Background

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Measurements

Results

Limitation

Conclusion

Primary funding source

Publications

U.S. Trends in Registration for Medical Cannabis and Reasons for Use From 2016 to 2020 : An Observational Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets