Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Stroke is a widespread and complex health issue, with many survivors requiring long-term rehabilitation due to upper-limb impairment. This study is aimed at comparing the perceived usability of two feedback-based stroke therapies: conventional mirror therapy (MT) and immersive virtual reality mirror therapy (VR).Methods
The study involved 45 participants, divided into three groups: the stroke survivors (n = 15), stroke-free older adults (n = 15), and young controls (n = 15). Participants performed two tasks using both MT and VR in a semirandom sequence. Usability instruments (SUS and NASA-TLX) were applied at the end of the activities, along with two experience-related questions.Results
The results indicated that both MT and VR had si
SUBMITTER: da Silva Jaques E
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10234727 | biostudies-literature | 2023
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature