Project description:BackgroundRotational atherectomy has become increasingly utilised over the past decade. Although a relatively safe procedure in appropriately trained physicians' hands, there are a number of recognised complications.Case summaryWe describe the case of a 64-year-old female who presented with chest pain and was diagnosed with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. A transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) showed normal biventricular function and no valve disease. Invasive coronary angiogram was performed which revealed a severely calcified ostial right coronary artery (RCA) disease which was felt to be the culprit of the presentation. Balloon dilatation was unsuccessful, therefore, rotational atherectomy with an Amplatz left 0.75 guide and a 1.5 mm rota-burr was utilised and improved calcium burden. This was complicated by ostial dissection, treated with stenting. A TTE following the procedure revealed moderate aortic regurgitation (AR). The patient was discharged as she remained asymptomatic. An outpatient transoesophageal echocardiogram performed eight months later showed evidence of severe eccentric AR. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging confirmed severe AR with left ventricular dilatation. Repeat angiogram 10 months after index procedure revealed in-stent restenosis, and the patient was accepted by heart multidisciplinary team for aortic valve replacement and grafting of RCA.DiscussionAs the field of rotational atherectomy continues to expand, we propose that novel complications such as reported in this case may become recognised. Finally, we stress the importance of multi-modality imaging in the investigation and timely planning of interventions in the management of these patients.

| S-EPMC10133995 | biostudies-literature

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Having Coronary Cusp Fusion versus Mixed Cusp Fusion Nonraphe Bicuspid Aortic Valve.

Project description:ObjectivesWe aimed to assess the procedural and clinical results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for nonraphe bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) with coronary vs mixed cusp fusion.BackgroundIt remains unclear whether cusp fusion morphology affects TAVR outcomes in patients with nonraphe bicuspid AS.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS and type-0 bicuspid aortic valve, who underwent TAVR at our institution between 2012 and 2017. TAVR outcomes were defined based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 recommendations.ResultsCompared to patients with mixed cusp fusion (44/71), those with coronary cusp fusion (27/71) had a larger ellipticity index for the aortic annulus (21.9% ± 9.0% vs 15.6% ± 9.3%, p=0.007) and increased left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (31.1% ± 9.4% vs 26.9% ± 7.5%, p=0.04) but comparable rates of second valve implantation (15.9% vs 14.8%), mild paravalvular leakage (PVL, 38.5% vs 30.2%), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM, 25.9% vs 15.9%), and 30-day mortality (7.4% vs 6.8%). Use of a first-generation transcatheter heart valve was associated with higher risk for mild PVL (odds ratio (OR) = 4.37; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.14-16.75; p=0.03) but not PPM (OR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.22-2.62; p=0.67), whereas a larger oversizing ratio tended to be associated with a higher PPM rate (OR = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.46-4.86; p=0.51) but lower incidence of mild PVL (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.19-1.35; p=0.17).ConclusionsIn AS patients with type-0 bicuspid valves, cusp fusion morphology does not affect the procedural or clinical results of TAVR. Use of second-generation transcatheter heart valves may provide more favorable results in such patients. This trial is registered with NCT01683474.

| S-EPMC6874966 | biostudies-literature

Aortic valve cusp repair does not affect durability of modified aortic valve reimplantation for tricuspid aortic valves.

Project description:ObjectiveDuring aortic valve reimplantation, cusp repair may be needed to produce a competent valve. We investigated whether the need for aortic valve cusp repair affects aortic valve reimplantation durability.MethodsPatients with tricuspid aortic valves who underwent aortic valve reimplantation from January 2002 to January 2020 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity matching was used to compare outcomes between patients who did and did not require aortic valve cusp repair.ResultsCusp repair was performed in 181 of 756 patients (24%). Patients who required cusp repair were more often male, were older, had more aortic valve regurgitation, and less often had connective tissue disease. Patients who underwent cusp repair had longer aortic clamp time (124 ± 43 minutes vs 107 ± 36 minutes, P = .001). In-hospital outcomes were similar between groups and with no operative deaths. A total of 98.3% of patients with cusp repair and 99.3% of patients without cusp repair had mild or less aortic regurgitation at discharge. The median follow-up was 3.9 and 3.2 years for the cusp repair and no cusp repair groups, respectively. At 10 years, estimated prevalence of moderate or more aortic regurgitation was 12% for patients with cusp repair and 7.0% for patients without cusp repair (P = .30). Mean aortic valve gradients were 6.2 mm Hg and 8.0 mm Hg, respectively (P = .01). Ten-year freedom from reoperation was 99% versus 99% (P = .64) in the matched cohort and 97% versus 97%, respectively (P = .30), in the unmatched cohort. Survival at 10 years was 98% after cusp repair and 93% without cusp repair (P = .05).ConclusionsAortic valve reimplantation for patients with tricuspid aortic valves has excellent long-term results. Need for aortic valve cusp repair does not affect long-term outcomes and should not deter surgeons from performing valve-sparing surgery.

| S-EPMC10774985 | biostudies-literature

Retrograde transcatheter closure of anterior mitral valve leaflet perforation.

Project description:Transcatheter closure of mitral valve leaflet perforation is a very rarely performed and a difficult procedure for repairing the defect. Herein, we are the first to report on both the safety and feasibility of percutaneous retrograde transcatheter closure of anterior mitral valve leaflet perforation with an AMPLATZER™ Duct Occluder II (6 mm × 6 mm, ADO II; Abbott Vascular, IL, USA) device in a 19-year-old patient with a severe mitral valve regurgitation following cardiac surgery.

| S-EPMC6716313 | biostudies-literature

Cusp thrombosis of a self-expandable sutureless aortic valve treated by valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedure: case report.

Project description:BackgroundSurgical implantation rates of bioprosthetic valves, especially the use of sutureless or rapid deployment valves, as well as the advent of transcatheter valve implantation (TAVR) have increased during the last decades mainly due to their excellent haemodynamic and clinical results. One common characteristic of all bioprosthetic types of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and TAVR is the risk of early degeneration, which leads to valve-dysfunction and is associated with higher rates of valve reinterventions. Recent studies have demonstrated that cusp thrombosis may play a role in early valve dysfunction. This case report is, to our knowledge, the first documentation on a successful treatment of early aortic valve (AV) degeneration of a sutureless AV thrombosis with a valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR implantation.Case summaryA 77 years old woman was re-evaluated from the heart-team, which considered the following characteristics: severe impairment of mobility and frailty with an STS-score of 10.01% and a EuroSCORE II of 6.9%. Due to the high surgical risk for SAVR, we decided to perform a ViV-TAVR using a balloonexpandable bioprosthesis. The procedure was performed via transfemoral access under general anaesthesia using a 23 mm Edwards-Sapien 3 bioprosthesis without balloon-valvuloplasty and with nominal-volume dilation under rapid-pacing.DiscussionThe differentiation of bioprosthesis valve thrombosis, and hypoattenuating leaflet thickening vs. structural valve degeneration can be difficult, and a multimodality imaging approach, comprising trans-thoracic echocardiogram, transoesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography, useful. These investigations are very important to decide the right strategy of surgical valve replacement vs. TAVR.

| S-EPMC6426046 | biostudies-literature

Impact of annulus-cusp mismatch on mid-term outcomes of aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

Project description:ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate mid-term outcomes of aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement based on different grades of annulus-cusp mismatch and identify optimal aortic root geometries for this procedure.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted between October 2011 and July 2022. Patients were stratified into three groups based on predicted coaptation length calculated using an annulus-cusp mismatch formula: no-mismatch (coaptation length > 4 mm, n = 52), mild-mismatch (2 mm ≤ coaptation length ≤ 4 mm, n = 28) and severe-mismatch (coaptation length < 2 mm, n = 25), and mid-term outcomes were compared.ResultsWe included 105 patients who underwent valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique. During the median follow-up of 6.0 years, 21 moderate aortic valve regurgitation events and 6 reoperation events were observed. No significant inter-group differences in overall survival or cumulative incidence of cardiac death or hospitalization for heart failure were observed. However, the groups significantly differed in the cumulative incidence of moderate aortic regurgitation at 5 years (2.0%, 14.8% and 60.1% for no-mismatch, mild-mismatch and severe-mismatch groups, respectively; P < 0.001) and cumulative incidence of reoperation at 5 years (0%, 0% and 11.8%, respectively; P = 0.002).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that severe annulus-cusp mismatch is associated with higher rates of valve regurgitation and reoperation following aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement; however, larger studies are needed for confirmation. Preoperative computed tomography-based assessment of annulus-cusp mismatch shows promise in surgical planning and patient selection for aortic valve repair procedures.Clinical registration number4392.

| S-EPMC11906396 | biostudies-literature

Balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the cusp-overlap technique for accurate valve positioning

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10883288 | biostudies-literature

Delayed traumatic aortic valve perforation after blunt chest trauma.

Project description:BackgroundAortic valve perforation is a rare complication of blunt chest trauma. We report a case of delayed aortic insufficiency presenting several months after trauma.Case presentationA 17-year-old male presented to the emergency department with traumatic brain injuries and blunt chest trauma, but no evidence of cardiac injuries. Three months later, he developed acute heart failure due to severe aortic valve regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction. A sizable tear in the right coronary cusp caused aortic insufficiency. He was treated successfully by surgical replacement with an aortic bioprosthesis.ConclusionWe reported a successful surgical case of valve replacement for delayed aortic valve perforation. Delayed valve perforation should be kept in mind after blunt chest trauma.

| S-EPMC10866806 | biostudies-literature

Early Transcatheter Aortic Valve Failure Accompanied with Leaflet Perforation.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6597454 | biostudies-literature