Dataset Information

Cardiac Damage Staging Classification in Asymptomatic Moderate or Severe Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Optimal timing for intervention remains uncertain in asymptomatic patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR). We aimed to assess the prognostic value of a new cardiac damage staging classification in patients with asymptomatic moderate or severe primary MR.

Methods

Clinical, Doppler-echocardiographic, and outcome data prospectively collected in 338 asymptomatic patients (64 ± 15 years, 68% men) with at least moderate primary MR were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were hierarchically classified as per the following staging classification: no cardiac damage (stage 0), mild left ventricular or left atrial damage (stage 1), moderate or severe left ventricular or left atrial damage (stage 2), pulmonary vasculature or tricuspid valve damage (stage 3), or right ventricular damage (stage 4).

Results

There was a stepwise increase in 10-year mortality rates as per cardiac damage stage: 20.0% in stage 0, 25.6% in stage 1, 31.5% in stage 2, and 61.3% in stage 3-4 (p < 0.001). The staging classification was significantly associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio = 1.41 per one-stage increase, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.85, p = 0.015) and the composite of cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization (hazard ratio = 1.51 per one-stage increase, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-2.15, p = 0.020) in multivariable analysis adjusted for EuroSCORE II, mitral valve intervention as a time-dependent variable, and other risk factors. The proposed scheme showed incremental value over several clinical variables (net reclassification index = 0.40, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

The new staging classification provides independent and incremental prognostic value in patients with asymptomatic moderate or severe MR.

SUBMITTER: Bernard J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10236891 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Cardiac Damage Staging Classification in Asymptomatic Moderate or Severe Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

Bernard Jérémy J Altes Alexandre A Dupuis Marlène M Toubal Oumhani O Mahjoub Haïfa H Tastet Lionel L Côté Nancy N Clavel Marie-Annick MA Dumortier Hélène H Tartar Jean J O'Connor Kim K Bernier Mathieu M Beaudoin Jonathan J Maréchaux Sylvestre S Pibarot Philippe P

Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team 20220312 1

<h4>Background</h4>Optimal timing for intervention remains uncertain in asymptomatic patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR). We aimed to assess the prognostic value of a new cardiac damage staging classification in patients with asymptomatic moderate or severe primary MR.<h4>Methods</h4>Clinical, Doppler-echocardiographic, and outcome data prospectively collected in 338 asymptomatic patients (64 ± 15 years, 68% men) with at least moderate primary MR were retrospectively analyzed. Patien ...[more]

PMID: 37273475

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWhen feasible, guidelines recommend mitral valve repair (MVr) over mitral valve replacement (MVR) to treat primary mitral regurgitation (MR), based upon historic outcome studies and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) reverse remodeling studies. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers reference standard biventricular assessment with superior MR quantification compared to TTE. Using serial CMR in primary MR patients, we aimed to investigate cardiac reverse remodeling and residual MR post-MVr vs MVR with chordal preservation.Methods83 patients with ≥ moderate-severe MR on TTE were prospectively recruited. 6-min walk tests (6MWT) and CMR imaging including cine imaging, aortic/pulmonary through-plane phase contrast imaging, T1 maps and late-gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) imaging were performed at baseline and 6 months after mitral surgery or watchful waiting (control group).Results72 patients completed follow-up (Controls = 20, MVr = 30 and MVR = 22). Surgical groups demonstrated comparable baseline cardiac indices and co-morbidities. At 6-months, MVr and MVR groups demonstrated comparable improvements in 6MWT distances (+ 57 ± 54 m vs + 64 ± 76 m respectively, p = 1), reduced indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (LVEDVi; - 29 ± 21 ml/m2 vs - 37 ± 22 ml/m2 respectively, p = 0.584) and left atrial volumes (- 23 ± 30 ml/m2 and - 39 ± 26 ml/m2 respectively, p = 0.545). At 6-months, compared with controls, right ventricular ejection fraction was poorer post-MVr (47 ± 6.1% vs 53 ± 8.0% respectively, p = 0.01) compared to post-MVR (50 ± 5.7% vs 53 ± 8.0% respectively, p = 0.698). MVR resulted in lower residual MR-regurgitant fraction (RF) than MVr (12 ± 8.0% vs 21 ± 11% respectively, p = 0.022). Baseline and follow-up indices of diffuse and focal myocardial fibrosis (Native T1 relaxation times, extra-cellular volume and quantified LGE respectively) were comparable between groups. Stepwise multiple linear regression of indexed variables in the surgical groups demonstrated baseline indexed mitral regurgitant volume as the sole multivariate predictor of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic reverse remodelling, baseline LVEDVi as the most significant independent multivariate predictor of follow-up LVEDVi, baseline indexed LV end-systolic volume as the sole multivariate predictor of follow-up LV ejection fraction and undergoing MVR (vs MVr) as the most significant (p < 0.001) baseline multivariate predictor of lower residual MR.ConclusionIn primary MR, MVR with chordal preservation may offer comparable cardiac reverse remodeling and functional benefits at 6-months when compared to MVr. Larger, multicenter CMR studies are required, which if the findings are confirmed could impact future surgical practice.

Project description:BackgroundMild physiologic mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in normal individuals. Patients with primary MR due to mitral valve prolapse (MVP) may also exhibit less than moderate MR. We sought to determine whether MVP patients with less than moderate MR displayed early cardiac chamber remodeling or factors related to early remodeling and whether early remodeling predicted MR progression.MethodsConsecutive MVP patients with less than moderate MR by proximal isovelocity surface area-derived effective regurgitant orifice < 20 mm2 and regurgitant volume < 30 mL, were matched for age and sex with non-MVP patients (controls) having less than moderate MR. Patients with moderate or greater dysfunctional left- or right-sided valves and left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% were excluded. We evaluated left ventricle (LV) and left atrium (LA) remodeling parameters (LV end-diastolic and end-systolic indexed diameters, LA volume-index, and LV mass-index) as well as determinants of remodeling. The last available transthoracic echocardiography was reviewed to identify progression to moderate-severe MR or more.ResultsA total of 253 MVP patients with less than moderate MR were matched to 344 controls (P for age and sex, ≥.18) with less than moderate MR. Patients with MVP (mean effective regurgitant orifice and regurgitant volume, 12 ± 4 mm2 and 18 ± 6 mL, respectively) had more premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), larger LV and LA remodeling parameters, and more mild-to-moderate MR (all P < .0001). Multivariate linear regression models showed that larger LV remodeling parameters were independently associated with MVP and female sex but not MR severity (all P < .0001). The LA volume index was independently associated with MVP, age, and E/e' (all P < .0001). The LV mass index was associated with MVP, age, and hypertension (all P ≤ .002). Presence of PVCs was associated with LV end-systolic diameter ≥ 40 mm and indexed ≥ 22 mm2 (P = .005). Among 323 (54%) patients having subsequent transthoracic echocardiography, 17 patients (all MVP) progressed to moderate-severe MR or more at a median of 4.3 (interquartile range, 1.7-6.4) years. Isolated posterior leaflet prolapse was the single factor associated with MR progression (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 0.99-7.34; P = .048) after adjustment for MR severity. At a median of 5.9 (interquartile range, 4.6-7.2) years of follow-up, female sex and MVP (vs controls) were protective factors for mortality.ConclusionsPatients with less than moderate MR due to MVP exhibit early LV and LA remodeling, which does not predict MR progression or mortality. Left ventricle remodeling is associated with MVP, female sex, and presence of PVCs. Early chamber remodeling associated with MVP may be the phenotypical expression of a genetically mediated process and is at least partially related to PVCs.

Project description:ObjectivesThe Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network recently reported no difference in the primary end point of left ventricular end-systolic volume index at 1 year postsurgery in patients randomized to repair (n = 126) or replacement (n = 125) for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. However, patients undergoing repair experienced significantly more recurrent mitral regurgitation than patients undergoing replacement (32.6% vs 2.3%). We examined whether baseline echocardiographic and clinical characteristics could identify those who will develop moderate/severe recurrent mitral regurgitation or die.MethodsOur analysis includes 116 patients who were randomized to and received mitral valve repair. Logistic regression was used to estimate a model-based probability of recurrence or death from baseline factors. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed from these estimated probabilities to determine classification cut-points maximizing accuracy of prediction based on sensitivity and specificity.ResultsOf the 116 patients, 6 received a replacement before leaving the operating room; all other patients had mild or less mitral regurgitation on intraoperative echocardiogram after repair. During the 2-year follow-up period, 76 patients developed moderate/severe mitral regurgitation or died (53 mitral regurgitation recurrences, 13 mitral regurgitation recurrences and death, and 10 deaths). The mechanism for recurrent mitral regurgitation was largely mitral valve leaflet tethering. Our model (including age, body mass index, sex, race, effective regurgitant orifice area, basal aneurysm/dyskinesis, New York Heart Association class, history of coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, or ventricular arrhythmias) yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82.ConclusionsThe model demonstrated good discrimination in identifying patients who will survive 2 years without recurrent mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair. Although our results require validation, they offer a clinically relevant risk score for selection of surgical candidates for this procedure.

Project description:BackgroundIschemic mitral regurgitation is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. For surgical patients with moderate regurgitation, the benefits of adding mitral-valve repair to coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) are uncertain.MethodsWe randomly assigned 301 patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation to CABG alone or CABG plus mitral-valve repair (combined procedure). The primary end point was the left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI), a measure of left ventricular remodeling, at 1 year. This end point was assessed with the use of a Wilcoxon rank-sum test in which deaths were categorized as the lowest LVESVI rank.ResultsAt 1 year, the mean LVESVI among surviving patients was 46.1±22.4 ml per square meter of body-surface area in the CABG-alone group and 49.6±31.5 ml per square meter in the combined-procedure group (mean change from baseline, -9.4 and -9.3 ml per square meter, respectively). The rate of death was 6.7% in the combined-procedure group and 7.3% in the CABG-alone group (hazard ratio with mitral-valve repair, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 2.12; P=0.81). The rank-based assessment of LVESVI at 1 year (incorporating deaths) showed no significant between-group difference (z score, 0.50; P=0.61). The addition of mitral-valve repair was associated with a longer bypass time (P<0.001), a longer hospital stay after surgery (P=0.002), and more neurologic events (P=0.03). Moderate or severe mitral regurgitation was less common in the combined-procedure group than in the CABG-alone group (11.2% vs. 31.0%, P<0.001). There were no significant between-group differences in major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events, deaths, readmissions, functional status, or quality of life at 1 year.ConclusionsIn patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation, the addition of mitral-valve repair to CABG did not result in a higher degree of left ventricular reverse remodeling. Mitral-valve repair was associated with a reduced prevalence of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation but an increased number of untoward events. Thus, at 1 year, this trial did not show a clinically meaningful advantage of adding mitral-valve repair to CABG. Longer-term follow-up may determine whether the lower prevalence of mitral regurgitation translates into a net clinical benefit. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00806988.).

Dataset Information

Cardiac Damage Staging Classification in Asymptomatic Moderate or Severe Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Cardiac Damage Staging Classification in Asymptomatic Moderate or Severe Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets