Dataset Information

Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy in treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) versus myofascial release therapy (MRT) on college students with chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP).

Methods

Thirty-three college students with a mean age of 21.33 ± 0.98 involved in distance learning due to the Corona Virus 2019 (COVID-19) restriction were randomized to receive either IASTM on the upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles or MRT. Researchers measured their pain with a visual analog scale (VAS), function with neck disability index (NDI), and pain pressure threshold (PPT) with a pressure algometer. The subjects received eight therapy sessions over four weeks and outcome measures were assessed pre and post-intervention. The study was registered as a clinical trial on clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT05213871).

Result

Unpaired t-test showed no statistical significance between the two groups post-intervention regarding improvement in pain, function, and PPT (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

This study showed insignificant differences between groups. However, we did not use a control group, indicating that the improvement in outcomes may not have been caused by the intervention.

Study design

Quasi-experimental two groups pre-posttest clinical trial.

Level of evidence

Therapy, level 2b.

SUBMITTER: Shewail F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10239038 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy in treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Shewail Fatma F Abdelmajeed Salwa S Farouk Mohamed M Abdelmegeed Mohamed M

BMC musculoskeletal disorders 20230603 1

<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) versus myofascial release therapy (MRT) on college students with chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP).<h4>Methods</h4>Thirty-three college students with a mean age of 21.33 ± 0.98 involved in distance learning due to the Corona Virus 2019 (COVID-19) restriction were randomized to receive either IASTM on the upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles or MRT. Researche ...[more]

PMID: 37270471

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundInstrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) is popular in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. However, the current literature has produced varying results. The purpose of this study was to collect the most recent studies to evaluate the effectiveness of IASTM on pain and function in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.MethodsThe researchers searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to February 25, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing treatment groups receiving IASTM combined with other treatments to those receiving other treatments among participants with musculoskeletal disorders. The outcomes were pain intensity, pain pressure threshold and function. The Cochran Q and I² indices were used to estimate heterogeneity. The data were analyzed as the standardized mean difference (SMD). The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to rate the quality of evidence. Trial sequential analysis and sensitivity analyses were also performed.ResultsEleven trials (involving 427 participants) were included in the quantitative analysis. Six trials had a high risk of bias; three, unclear; and two, low. There was moderate-certainty evidence indicating that IASTM was effective in reducing patient-reported pain (n = 11) (n = 427, SMD = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.80, p < 0.01), and there was low-certainty evidence indicating that IASTM was effective in improving patient-reported function (n = 8) (n = 333, SMD = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.77, p < 0.05). Only one data point was extracted for the pain pressure threshold, and a meta-analysis was not performed. Trial sequential analysis revealed that the cumulative z score crossed the monitoring boundary for superiority for patient-reported pain in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain and cervicogenic headache at the 4-week IASTM.ConclusionsIASTM can reduce patient-reported pain (with moderate certainty) and improve patient-reported function (with low certainty) in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Future clinical studies do not need to explore the short-term effects of IASTM on patient-reported pain in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain and cervicogenic headache.Trial registrationThe PROSPERO registration ID is CRD42024534643 (April 10, 2024).

Project description:BackgroundThe association between hamstring tightness and knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is significant because tight hamstrings can put more strain on the knee joint, reduce its range of motion, and cause compensatory movements that worsen the KOA.ObjectiveTo compare the effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and proprioceptive neuromuscular (PNF) on hamstring flexibility in patients with KOA.MethodsData for the randomized controlled trial (NCT05110326) was collected from n = 60 participants randomly divided into group A received IASTM and group B received PNF stretching. In group A, the therapist made 30 strokes gentle strokes with the tool from the origin to the insertion while holding the plane at a 45-degree angle over the treatment area. In group B, PNF stretching was done with three repetitions and 10 seconds rest between each, after isometric contraction of the hamstring muscle using approximately 50% of their maximum strength, holding it for 8 seconds, and then releasing it. A 30-minute session was given to each patient three times per week and was given for 6 weeks. Outcome measures were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, the active knee extension test (AKET) for hamstring flexibility, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) for the health status of KOA patients.ResultsThe study found a significant interaction (p < 0.001) between interventions and time across several measurements. After 6 weeks, both interventions resulted in significant improvements (p < 0.001) across all dependent variables, with group A (IASTM) showing more significant improvement in hamstring flexibility, pain reduction, and health status (p < 0.001) compared to group B (PNF).ConclusionsBoth the IASTM technique and PNF stretching resulted in increased hamstring flexibility, decreased pain, and enhanced general health. The IASTM technique, however, showed potential benefits over PNF stretching in terms of flexibility, pain relief, and public health enhancement. Physical therapists and manual therapists may prioritize the usage of the IASTM technique for patients who want to make significant changes in these areas.

Project description:BackgroundNon-specific neck pain is the most prevailing musculoskeletal disorder which has a large socioeconomic burden worldwide. It is associated with poor posture and neck strain which may lead to pain and restricted mobility. Physical therapists treat such patients through several means. Post isometric relaxation and Myofascial release therapy are used in clinical practice with little evidence to be firmed appropriately. So, this study was conducted to explore the effect of Post-isometric relaxation in comparison to Myofascial release therapy for patients having non-specific neck pain.MethodologySixty patients were randomly allocated to Post isometric group and the Myofascial group. The treatment period was of 2 weeks. All the patients were evaluated using the Visual analogue scale (VAS), Neck disability index (NDI), Universal Goniometer, and WHO BREF Quality of life-100 in the 1st and 6th sessions. Recorded data was entered on SPSS 21. Data were examined using two-way repeated ANOVA to measure the variance of analysis (group x time).ResultsAnalysis of the baseline characteristics revealed that both groups were homogenous in terms of age and gender i.e. a total of 60 participants were included in this research study 30 in each group. Out of 60 patients, there were 20(33.3%) males and 40(66.7%) females with a mean age of 32.4(5.0) years. Participants in the Post Isometric group demonstrated significant improvements (p < 0.025) in VAS, NDI, Cervical Extension, left side rotation ranges, and QoL (Social Domain) at the 2-week follow-up compared with those in the Myofascial group. In addition, the Myofascial group indicated significantly better improvement in the mean score of CROM (flexion and right and left side bending).ConclusionThe study demonstrated patients with nonspecific neck pain can benefit from the post isometric relaxation with significant improvement in pain, disability, cervical ROM, and Quality of life compared with myofascial release therapy.Trial registrationClinical Trial registered on clinicaltrial.gov (NCT number) NCT04638062 , 20/11/2020 (prospectively registered).

Dataset Information

Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy in treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Objective

Methods

Result

Conclusion

Study design

Level of evidence

Publications

Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy in treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets