Dataset Information

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma in clinical practice.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Studies have suggested the potential efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. This multicenter observational study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of systemic ICI therapy and chemoradiation followed by durvalumab therapy for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma.

Methods

We analyzed the data of patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma who received systemic ICI therapy or chemoradiation followed by durvalumab therapy between 2016 and 2022.

Results

In this study, data of a total of 22 patients who received systemic ICI therapy and four patients who received chemoradiation followed by durvalumab therapy were analyzed. In the patients who received systemic ICI therapy, the median progression-free survival after initiation of therapy was 9.6 months, and the overall survival did not reach the median. The 1-year progression-free survival rate and overall survival rate were estimated to be 45.5% and 50.1%, respectively. Although the log-rank test revealed no significant association between the tumor expression level of programmed death ligand-1 (tumor proportion score evaluated using 22C3 antibody: ≥50% vs. <50%) and the survival duration, the majority of patients showing long-term survival showed a tumor proportion score of ≥50%. Of four patients treated with chemoradiation followed by durvalumab therapy, two patients showed an overall survival of ≥30 months, whereas the remaining two patients died within 12 months.

Conclusion

The progression-free survival of patients who received systemic ICI therapy was 9.6 months, suggesting that ICI therapy might be effective in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma.

SUBMITTER: Inomata M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10260484 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma in clinical practice.

Inomata Minehiko M Tsuda Takeshi T Ichikawa Tomomi T Matsumoto Masahiro M Mizushima Isami I Azechi Kenji K Takata Naoki N Murayama Nozomu N Hayashi Kana K Hirai Takahiro T Seto Zenta Z Tokui Kotaro K Masaki Yasuaki Y Taka Chihiro C Okazawa Seisuke S Kambara Kenta K Imanishi Shingo S Taniguchi Hirokazu H Miwa Toshiro T Hayashi Ryuji R Matsui Shoko S Tobe Kazuyuki K

Thoracic cancer 20230426 17

<h4>Objective</h4>Studies have suggested the potential efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. This multicenter observational study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of systemic ICI therapy and chemoradiation followed by durvalumab therapy for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed the data of patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma who received systemic ICI therapy or chemoradiation followed by durvalumab therapy betwe ...[more]

PMID: 37101081

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare and aggressive disease without standardized treatment strategies. The efficacy of second-line or beyond immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been proven in recent studies, whereas the evidence for first-line immunotherapy for PSC is still limited to case reports and remains poorly understood.Materials and methodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 21 patients with a histological diagnosis of PSC who received ICI as first-line therapy from January 2019 to March 2022. The expression of PD-L1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the monoclonal antibody 22C3. Low and high PD-L1 expressions were defined using the tumor proportion score (TPS), with cutoffs of 1 and 50%, respectively.ResultsAll eight patients had PD-L1 positivity who underwent PD-L1 expression assessment, and six patients (6/8, 75.0%) had high PD-L1 expression. Among the 21 PSC patients, seven received tislelizumab, six received camrelizumab, four received sintilimab, three received pembrolizumab, and one received durvalumab. Among them, 18 PSCs received combination therapy, whereas another three PSCs received immunotherapy alone. Out of the 21 PSC patients, 12 (57.1%) achieved a partial response (PR), and five patients had stable disease (SD) as the best response, whereas four PSCs experienced dramatic progressive disease (PD). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.2 (95% CI [4.3, 14.1]) months, and the median OS was 22.8 (95% CI [4.0, 41.5]) months. Among the three treatment groups (immunotherapy alone, immunotherapy combined with anlotinib, and chemoimmunotherapy), the median PFS was 8.0, 9.4, and 9.6 months, and the median OS was 19.0, 22.8, and 30.6 months, respectively. There was no difference in PFS and OS between the three treatment regimen groups (P = 0.86 and P = 0.34, respectively) and different immunotherapies (P = 0.10 and P = 0.23, respectively). No serious adverse events (grade ≥ 3) were noted.ConclusionFirst-line immunotherapy has promising therapeutic potential in the treatment of PSC. More studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Project description:Purpose To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy. Methods A multidisciplinary, multi-organizational panel of experts in medical oncology, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, pulmonology, endocrinology, urology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialist, and advocacy was convened to develop the clinical practice guideline. Guideline development involved a systematic review of the literature and an informal consensus process. The systematic review focused on guidelines, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and case series published from 2000 through 2017. Results The systematic review identified 204 eligible publications. Much of the evidence consisted of systematic reviews of observational data, consensus guidelines, case series, and case reports. Due to the paucity of high-quality evidence on management of immune-related adverse events, recommendations are based on expert consensus. Recommendations Recommendations for specific organ system-based toxicity diagnosis and management are presented. While management varies according to organ system affected, in general, ICPi therapy should be continued with close monitoring for grade 1 toxicities, with the exception of some neurologic, hematologic, and cardiac toxicities. ICPi therapy may be suspended for most grade 2 toxicities, with consideration of resuming when symptoms revert to grade 1 or less. Corticosteroids may be administered. Grade 3 toxicities generally warrant suspension of ICPis and the initiation of high-dose corticosteroids (prednisone 1 to 2 mg/kg/d or methylprednisolone 1 to 2 mg/kg/d). Corticosteroids should be tapered over the course of at least 4 to 6 weeks. Some refractory cases may require infliximab or other immunosuppressive therapy. In general, permanent discontinuation of ICPis is recommended with grade 4 toxicities, with the exception of endocrinopathies that have been controlled by hormone replacement. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .

Dataset Information

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma in clinical practice.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma in clinical practice.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets