Dataset Information

Comparison of colorimetric, fluorometric, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assays for acetyl-coenzyme A.

ABSTRACT: Acetyl-Coenzyme A is a central metabolite in catabolic and anabolic pathways as well as the acyl donor for acetylation reactions. Multiple quantitative measurement techniques for acetyl-CoA have been reported, including commercially available kits. Comparisons between techniques for acetyl-CoA measurement have not been reported. This lack of comparability between assays makes context-specific assay selection and interpretation of results reporting changes in acetyl-CoA metabolism difficult. We compared commercially available colorimetric ELISA and fluorometric enzymatic-based kits to liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based assays using tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). The colorimetric ELISA kit did not produce interpretable results even with commercially available pure standards. The fluorometric enzymatic kit produced comparable results to the LC-MS-based assays depending on matrix and extraction. LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS assays produced well-aligned results, especially when incorporating stable isotope-labeled internal standards. In addition, we demonstrated the multiplexing capability of the LC-HRMS assay by measuring a suite of short-chain acyl-CoAs in a variety of acute myeloid leukemia cell lines and patient cells.

SUBMITTER: Kantner DS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10312605 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of colorimetric, fluorometric, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assays for acetyl-coenzyme A.

Kantner Daniel S DS Megill Emily E Bostwick Anna A Yang Vicky V Bekeova Carmen C Van Scoyk Alexandria A Seifert Erin E Deininger Michael W MW Snyder Nathaniel W NW

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 20230815

Acetyl-Coenzyme A is a central metabolite in catabolic and anabolic pathways as well as the acyl donor for acetylation reactions. Multiple quantitative measurement techniques for acetyl-CoA have been reported, including commercially available kits. Comparisons between techniques for acetyl-CoA measurement have not been reported. This lack of comparability between assays makes context-specific assay selection and interpretation of results reporting changes in acetyl-CoA metabolism difficult. We c ...[more]

PMID: 37398224

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction and objectivesThe application of untargeted metabolomics assays using ultra high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS) to study metabolism in biological systems including humans is rapidly increasing. In some of these studies there is a requirement to collect and analyse low sample volumes of biofluids (e.g. tear fluid) or low cell and tissue mass samples (e.g. tissue needle biopsies). The application of microflow, capillary or nano liquid chromatography (≤ 1.0 mm column internal diameter (i.d.)) theoretically should accomplish a higher assay sensitivity compared to analytical liquid chromatography (2.1-5.0 mm column internal diameter). To date, there has been limited research into microflow UHPLC-MS assays that can be applied to study samples of low volume or mass.MethodsThis paper presents three complementary UHPLC-MS assays (aqueous C18 reversed-phase, lipidomics C18 reversed-phase and Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography (HILIC)) applying 1.0 mm internal diameter columns for untargeted metabolomics. Human plasma and urine samples were applied for the method development, with porcine plasma, urine and tear fluid used for method assessment. Data were collected and compared for columns of the same length, stationary phase and stationary phase particle size but with two different column internal diameters (2.1 mm and 1.0 mm).Results and conclusionsAll three assays showed an increase in peak areas and peak widths when applying the 1.0 mm i.d. assays. HILIC assays provide an advantage at lower sample dilutions whereas for reversed phase (RP) assays there was no benefit added. This can be seen in the validation study where a much higher number of compounds were detected in the HILIC assay. RP assays were still appropriate for small volume samples with hundreds of compounds being detected. In summary, the 1.0 mm i.d. column assays are applicable for small volume samples where dilution is required during sample preparation.

Dataset Information

Comparison of colorimetric, fluorometric, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assays for acetyl-coenzyme A.

Publications

Comparison of colorimetric, fluorometric, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assays for acetyl-coenzyme A.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets