Motion distractors perturb saccade programming later in time than static distractors.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: The mechanism that reweights oculomotor vectors based on visual features is unclear. However, the latency of oculomotor visual activations gives insight into their antecedent featural processing. We compared the oculomotor processing time course of grayscale, task-irrelevant static and motion distractors during target selection by continuously measuring a battery of human saccadic behavioral metrics as a function of time after distractor onset. The motion direction was towards or away from the target and the motion speed was fast or slow. We compared static and motion distractors and observed that both distractors elicited curved saccades and shifted endpoints at short latencies (∼25 ms). After 50 ms, saccade trajectory biasing elicited by motion distractors lagged static distractor trajec
SUBMITTER: Kehoe DH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10313862 | biostudies-literature | 2023
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA