Predatory journals: Perception, impact and use of Beall's list by the scientific community-A bibliometric big data study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Beall's list is widely used to identify potentially predatory journals. With this study, we aim to investigate the impact of Beall's list on the perception of listed journals as well as on the publication and citation behavior of the scientific community. We performed comprehensive bibliometric analyses of data extracted from the ISSN database, PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Crossref, Scopus and Web of Science. Citation analysis was performed by data extracted from the Crossref Cited-by database. At the time of analysis, Beall's list consisted of 1,289 standalone journals and 1,162 publishers, which corresponds to 21,735 individual journals. Of these, 3,206 (38.8%) were located in the United States, 2,484 in India (30.0%), and 585 in United Kingdom (7.1%). The majority of journals were list
SUBMITTER: Richtig G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10328228 | biostudies-literature | 2023
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA