Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Relative Effectiveness of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S Vaccines and Homologous Boosting in Preventing COVID-19 in Adults in the US.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Few head-to-head comparisons have been performed on the real-world effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) booster vaccines. We evaluated the relative effectiveness (rVE) of a primary series of mRNA-1273 vs BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S and a homologous mRNA booster against any medically attended, outpatient, and hospitalized COVID-19.

Methods

A data set linking primary care electronic medical records with medical claims data was used for this retrospective cohort study of US patients age ≥18 years vaccinated with a primary series between February and October 2021 (Part 1) and a homologous mRNA booster between October 2021 and January 2022 (Part 2). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were derived from 1:1 matching adjusted across potential covariates. rVE was (1 - HRadjusted) × 100. Additional analysis was performed across regions and age groups.

Results

Following adjustment, Part 1 rVE for mRNA-1273 vs BNT162b2 was 23% (95% CI, 22%-25%), 23% (95% CI, 22%-25%), and 19% (95% CI, 14%-24%), while the rVE for mRNA-1273 vs Ad26.COV2.S was 50% (95% CI, 48%-51%), 50% (95% CI, 48%-52%), and 57% (95% CI, 53%-61%) against any medically attended, outpatient, and hospitalized COVID-19, respectively. The adjusted rVE in Part 2 for mRNA-1273 vs BNT162b2 was 14% (95% CI, 10%-18%), 13% (95% CI, 8%-17%), and 19% (95% CI, 1%-34%) against any medically attended, outpatient, and hospitalized COVID-19, respectively. rVE against medically attended COVID-19 was higher in adults age ≥65 years (35%; 95% CI, 24%-47%) than in those age 18-64 years (13%; 95% CI, 9%-17%) after the booster.

Conclusions

In this study, mRNA-1273 was more effective than BNT162b2 or Ad26.COV2.S following a primary series during the Delta-dominant period and more effective than BNT162b2 as a booster during the Omicron-dominant period.

SUBMITTER: Hung Nguyen V 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10368199 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Relative Effectiveness of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S Vaccines and Homologous Boosting in Preventing COVID-19 in Adults in the US.

Hung Nguyen Van V   Boileau Catherine C   Bogdanov Alina A   Sredl Meg M   Bonafede Mac M   Ducruet Thierry T   Chavers Scott S   Rosen Andrew A   Martin David D   Buck Philip P   Esposito Daina D   Van de Velde Nicolas N   Mansi James A JA  

Open forum infectious diseases 20230525 7


<h4>Background</h4>Few head-to-head comparisons have been performed on the real-world effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) booster vaccines. We evaluated the relative effectiveness (rVE) of a primary series of mRNA-1273 vs BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S and a homologous mRNA booster against any medically attended, outpatient, and hospitalized COVID-19.<h4>Methods</h4>A data set linking primary care electronic medical records with medical claims data was used for this retrospective coho  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8689763 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10704142 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9513709 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9420538 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9676979 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9011903 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9258461 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9228110 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8796790 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9093716 | biostudies-literature