Dataset Information

Low-Pass Genome Sequencing-Based Detection of Paternity: Validation in Clinical Cytogenetics.

ABSTRACT: Submission of a non-biological parent together with a proband for genetic diagnosis would cause a misattributed parentage (MP), possibly leading to misinterpretation of the pathogenicity of genomic variants. Therefore, a rapid and cost-effective paternity/maternity test is warranted before genetic testing. Although low-pass genome sequencing (GS) has been widely used for the clinical diagnosis of germline structural variants, it is limited in paternity/maternity tests due to the inadequate read coverage for genotyping. Herein, we developed rapid paternity/maternity testing based on low-pass GS with trio-based and duo-based analytical modes provided. The optimal read-depth was determined as 1-fold per case regardless of sequencing read lengths, modes, and library construction methods by using 10 trios with confirmed genetic relationships. In addition, low-pass GS with different library construction methods and 1-fold read-depths were performed for 120 prenatal trios prospectively collected, and 1 trio was identified as non-maternity, providing a rate of MP of 0.83% (1/120). All results were further confirmed via quantitative florescent PCR. Overall, we developed a rapid, cost-effective, and sequencing platform-neutral paternity/maternity test based on low-pass GS and demonstrated the feasibility of its clinical use in confirming the parentage for genetic diagnosis.

SUBMITTER: Li K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10379141 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Low-Pass Genome Sequencing-Based Detection of Paternity: Validation in Clinical Cytogenetics.

Li Keying K Zhao Yilin Y Chau Matthew Hoi Kin MHK Cao Ye Y Leung Tak Yeung TY Kwok Yvonne K YK Choy Kwong Wai KW Dong Zirui Z

Genes 20230627 7

Submission of a non-biological parent together with a proband for genetic diagnosis would cause a misattributed parentage (MP), possibly leading to misinterpretation of the pathogenicity of genomic variants. Therefore, a rapid and cost-effective paternity/maternity test is warranted before genetic testing. Although low-pass genome sequencing (GS) has been widely used for the clinical diagnosis of germline structural variants, it is limited in paternity/maternity tests due to the inadequate read ...[more]

PMID: 37510263

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLow-pass genome sequencing (LP GS) has shown distinct advantages over traditional methods for the detection of mosaicism. However, no study has systematically evaluated the accuracy of LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and copy number variants (CNVs) in prenatal diagnosis. Moreover, the influence of sequencing depth on mosaicism detection of LP GS has not been fully evaluated.MethodsTo evaluate the accuracy of LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and mosaic CNVs, 27 samples with known aneuploidies and CNVs and 1 negative female sample were used to generate 6 simulated samples and 21 virtual samples, each sample contained 9 different mosaic levels. Mosaic levels were simulated by pooling reads or DNA from each positive sample and the negative sample according to a series of percentages (ranging from 3 to 40%). Then, the influence of sequencing depth on LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and CNVs was evaluated by downsampling.ResultsTo evaluate the accuracy of LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and CNVs, a comparative analysis of mosaic levels was performed using 6 simulated samples and 21 virtual samples with 35 M million (M) uniquely aligned high-quality reads (UAHRs). For mosaic levels > 30%, the average difference (detected mosaic levels vs. theoretical mosaic levels) of 6 mosaic CNVs in simulated samples was 4.0%, and the average difference (detected mosaic levels vs. mosaic levels of Y chromosome) of 6 mosaic aneuploidies and 15 mosaic CNVs in virtual samples was 2.7%. Furthermore, LP GS had a higher detection rate and accuracy for the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and CNVs of larger sizes, especially mosaic aneuploidies. For depth evaluation, the results of LP GS in downsampling samples were compared with those of LP GS using 35 M UAHRs. The detection sensitivity of LP GS for 6 mosaic aneuploidies and 15 mosaic CNVs in virtual samples increased with UAHR. For mosaic levels > 30%, the total detection sensitivity reached a plateau at 30 M UAHRs. With 30 M UAHRs, the total detection sensitivity was 99.2% for virtual samples.ConclusionsWe demonstrated the accuracy of LP GS in mosaicism detection using simulated data and virtual samples, respectively. Thirty M UAHRs (single-end 35 bp) were optimal for LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and most mosaic CNVs larger than 1.48 Mb (Megabases) with mosaic levels > 30%. These results could provide a reference for laboratories that perform clinical LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and CNVs.

Dataset Information

Low-Pass Genome Sequencing-Based Detection of Paternity: Validation in Clinical Cytogenetics.

Publications

Low-Pass Genome Sequencing-Based Detection of Paternity: Validation in Clinical Cytogenetics.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets