Cystatin C as a Marker for Glomerular Filtration Rate in Critically Ill Neonates and Children: Validation Against Iohexol Plasma Clearance.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Smeets NJL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10403645 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Cystatin C as a Marker for Glomerular Filtration Rate in Critically Ill Neonates and Children: Validation Against Iohexol Plasma Clearance.
Smeets Nori J L NJL Bökenkamp A A Grubb Anders A de Wildt Saskia N SN Schreuder Michiel F MF
Kidney international reports 20230603 8
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) and augmented renal clearance (ARC), both alterations of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), are prevalent in critically ill children and neonates. AKI and ARC prevalence estimates are based on estimation of GFR (eGFR) using serum creatinine (SCr), which is known to be inaccurate. We aimed to test our hypothesis that AKI prevalence will be higher and ARC prevalence will be lower in critically ill children when using iohexol-based measured GFR (mGFR), rather than using eGFR. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the performance of different SCr-based eGFR methods.MethodsIn this single-center prospective study, critically ill term-born neonates and children were included. mGFR was calculated using a plasma disappearance curve after parenteral administration of iohexol. AKI diagnosis was based on the KDIGO criteria, SCr-based eGFR, and creatinine clearance (CrCL). Differences between eGFR and mGFR were determined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and by calculating bias and accuracy (percentage of eGFR values within 30% of mGFR values).ResultsOne hundred five children, including 43 neonates, were included. AKI prevalence was higher based on mGFR (48%), than with KDIGO or eGFR (11-40%). ARC prevalence was lower with mGFR (24%) compared to eGFR (38-51%). eGFR equations significantly overestimated mGFR (60-71 versus 41 ml/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.001-0.002). Accuracy was highest with eGFR equations based on age- and sex-dependent equations (up to 59%).ConclusionIohexol-based AKI prevalence was higher and ARC prevalence lower compared to standard SCr-based eGFR methods. Age- and sex-dependent equations for eGFR (eGFR-Smeets for neonates and eGFR-Pierce for children) best approached measured GFR and should preferably be used to optimize diagnosis of AKI and ARC in this population. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
| S-EPMC9925555 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC11210064 | biostudies-literature
Project description:While there is general agreement on the necessity to measure glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in many clinical situations, there is less agreement on the best method to achieve this purpose. As the gold standard method for GFR determination, urinary (or renal) clearance of inulin, fades into the background due to inconvenience and high cost, a diversity of filtration markers and protocols compete to replace it. In this review, we suggest that iohexol, a non-ionic contrast agent, is most suited to replace inulin as the marker of choice for GFR determination. Iohexol comes very close to fulfilling all requirements for an ideal GFR marker in terms of low extra-renal excretion, low protein binding and in being neither secreted nor reabsorbed by the kidney. In addition, iohexol is virtually non-toxic and carries a low cost. As iohexol is stable in plasma, administration and sample analysis can be separated in both space and time, allowing access to GFR determination across different settings. An external proficiency programme operated by Equalis AB, Sweden, exists for iohexol, facilitating interlaboratory comparison of results. Plasma clearance measurement is the protocol of choice as it combines a reliable GFR determination with convenience for the patient. Single-sample protocols dominate, but multiple-sample protocols may be more accurate in specific situations. In low GFRs one or more late samples should be included to improve accuracy. In patients with large oedema or ascites, urinary clearance protocols should be employed. In conclusion, plasma clearance of iohexol may well be the best candidate for a common GFR determination method.
| S-EPMC5036902 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Plasma clearance of iohexol is a key tool to precisely determine glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in clinical research and clinical practice. Despite evidence that iohexol pharmacokinetics are described best by three-compartment models, two-compartment approaches (Schwartz approach) are customary, which might result in avoidable bias and imprecision. We aimed to provide a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model of iohexol by re-evaluating data from the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) to compare respective clearance estimates to the Schwartz approach and to assess the impact of revised clearance estimates on the BIS equations. A popPK model was developed based on iohexol plasma samples (8-10 per subject, iohexol dose 3235 mg) from 570 elderly patients. A three-compartment model appropriately described the pharmacokinetics of iohexol (clearance 57.4 mL/min, CV 33%). Compared to the three-compartment model, clearance values were overestimated by the Schwartz approach (bias 6.5 mL/min), resulting in limited effects on regression coefficients of the BIS equations (e.g., proportionality factor of BIS2 changed from 767 to 720). Predictions based on the BIS2 equation were biased (5.4 mL/min/1.73 m²) and the sensitivity to detect a GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² was low compared to the revised equation (72% versus 89%). Three-compartment models should be employed to assess iohexol pharmacokinetics.
| S-EPMC6286374 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Continuous monitoring of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the perioperative setting could provide valuable information about acute kidney injury risk for both clinical and research purposes. This pilot study aimed to demonstrate that GFR measurement by a continuous 72 hrs iohexol infusion in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery is feasible. Four patients undergoing robot-assisted colorectal cancer surgery were recruited from elective surgery listings. GFR was determined preoperatively by the single-sample iohexol clearance method, and postoperatively at timed intervals by a continuous iohexol infusion for 72 hrs. Plasma concentrations of creatinine and cystatin C were measured concurrently. GFR was calculated as (iohexol infusion rate (mg/min))/(plasma iohexol concentration (mg/mL)). The association of the three different filtration markers and GFR with time were analysed in generalized additive mixed models. The continuous infusion of iohexol was established in all four patients and maintained throughout the study period without interfering with ordinary postoperative care. Postoperative GFR at 2 hours were elevated compared to the preoperative measurements for patients 1, 2, and 3, but not for patient 4. Whereas patients 1, 2, and 3 had u-shaped postoperative mGFR curves, patient 4 demonstrated a linear increase in mGFR with time. We conclude that obtaining continuous measurements of GFR in the postoperative setting is feasible and can detect variations in GFR. The method can be used as a tool to track perioperative changes in renal function.
| S-EPMC9155923 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTherapeutic hypothermia (TH) is an established intervention to improve the outcome of neonates with moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy resulting from perinatal asphyxia. Despite this beneficial effect, TH may further affect drug elimination pathways such as the glomerular filtration rate.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to quantify the effect of TH in addition to asphyxia on mannitol clearance as a surrogate for the glomerular filtration rate.MethodsThe effect of asphyxia and TH (mild vs moderate/severe) on mannitol clearance was assessed using a population approach, based on mannitol observations collected in the ALBINO (ALlopurinol in addition to TH for hypoxic-ischemic Brain Injury on Neurocognitive Outcome) trial, as some were exposed to a second dose of 10 mg/kg intravenous mannitol as placebo to ensure blinding. Pharmacokinetic analysis and model development were conducted using NONMEM version 7.4.ResultsBased on 77 observations from 17 neonates (TH = 13), a one-compartment model with first-order linear elimination best described the observed data. To account for prenatal glomerular filtration rate maturation, both birthweight and gestational age were implemented as clearance covariates using an earlier published three-quarters power function and a sigmoid hyperbolic function. Our final model predicted a mannitol clearance of 0.15 L/h for a typical asphyxia neonate (39.5 weeks, birthweight 3.25 kg, no TH), lower than the reported value of 0.33 L/h for a healthy neonate of similar age and weight. By introducing TH as a binary covariate on clearance, the additional impact of TH on mannitol clearance was quantified (60% decrease).ConclusionsMannitol clearance was decreased by approximately 60% in neonates undergoing TH, although this is likely confounded with asphyxia severity.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03162653.
| S-EPMC8249265 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMeasuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using iohexol plasma clearance has been proposed as the preferred way for GFR determination. The extended multiple-sample protocol is based on fitting the full concentration-time decay-curve, and from the obtained fit-parameters, the area under the curve (AUC) and GFR (the injected dose divided by the AUC) were calculated. The goal of the current study is to evaluate the impact of different fitting procedures on the precision of GFR-results obtained from the full concentration-time curve, and compare these results with those obtained with simplified multiple-samples and single-sample protocols.MethodsThe concentration-time curves of 8 samples at times 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 and 300 min after bolus injection of iohexol of 570 adults, aged 70+, from the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS), were analysed. The fit-parameters for the two-compartment model (double-exponential decay curve), and from these, the AUC and GFR were obtained with 8 different fitting procedures.ResultsThe two-compartmental non-linear least squares fitting procedure showed the best accuracy (541 out of 570 reported GFR-results were within 5% of the majority of the 8 fitting methods). The two-compartmental slope-intercept fitting procedure was not always applicable and the non-compartmental fitting procedures did not always allow to calculate the GFR. All correction formulas for the simplified late multiple-samples methods showed acceptable accuracy and precision with a preference for Ng's correction formula (Lin's CCC = 0.992, bias = 0.5 ± 2.5). Jacobsson's iterative method was the best one-sample method, with Lin's CCC = 0.983 and bias = - 0.6 ± 3.4.ConclusionThe fitting procedure has an important impact on the precision of the calculated AUC and GFR. The simplified late-sample protocols and one-sample methods did not suffer from fitting problems and showed acceptable equivalence when compared to the full compartment GFR-results.Trial registrationThe "Berlin Initiative Study" is officially registered with the German Register for Clinical Studies ("Deutschen Register Klinischer Studien"(DRKS)) under registration number DRKS00017058 , since April 12, 2019, and it is also visible on the WHO clinical trials registry platform (within the next 4 weeks after the registration date).
| S-EPMC8101203 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Clearance of an intravenous iohexol dose of 3235 mg is used to assess glomerular filtration rate (GFR), although systematic assessment of its pharmacokinetic (PK) properties is incomplete. The objectives of the present investigations were (i) to assess potential interactions of iohexol with important drug transporters, and (ii) whether a 259 mg dose could replace the current standard dose. In vitro, we evaluated whether iohexol inhibits or is transported by renal transporters (hOAT1/3, hOCT2, and hMATE1/2K) or other transporters (hOATP1B1/3, hOCT1, and hMDR1) using cell-based and vesicle-based systems. In vivo, we conducted a clinical trial with 12 volunteers with the administration of single intravenous doses of 3235 mg ("reference") and 259 mg ("test") using a changeover design. Plasma and urine samples were collected up to 24 h postdose. We assessed the dose linearity of iohexol pharmacokinetics using the standard bioequivalence approach and conducted a population PK analysis to characterize its profile. Our in vitro findings indicate that iohexol is neither a substrate nor a significant inhibitor of the transporters, suggesting it is unlikely to participate in transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions in vivo. In the clinical trial, the test/reference ratio for plasma clearance, calculated as dose divided by the area under the plasma concentration-time curve, was 1.01 (90% confidence interval 0.968-1.05), confirming dose linearity. Population PK analysis further supported these results, showing no significant effect of dose on renal clearance and negligible nonrenal clearance of iohexol. Low-dose iohexol is a suitable marker for precise GFR measurement, even when coadministered with other drugs.
| S-EPMC11788587 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionEstimation of kidney function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), is important for appropriate dosing of drugs and adjustment of therapeutic strategies, but challenging due to fluctuations in kidney function, creatinine metabolism and fluid balance. Data on the agreement between estimating and gold standard methods to assess glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in early AKI are lacking. We evaluated the agreement of urinary creatinine clearance (CrCl) and three commonly used estimating equations, the Cockcroft Gault (CG), the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations, in comparison to GFR measured by the infusion clearance of chromium-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (51Cr-EDTA), in critically ill patients with early AKI after complicated cardiac surgery.MethodsThirty patients with early AKI were studied in the intensive care unit, 2 to 12 days after complicated cardiac surgery. The infusion clearance for 51Cr-EDTA obtained as a measure of GFR (GFR51Cr-EDTA) was calculated from the formula: GFR (mL/min/1.73m2)=(51Cr-EDTA infusion rate×1.73)/(arterial 51Cr-EDTA×body surface area) and compared with the urinary CrCl and the estimated GFR (eGFR) from the three estimating equations. Urine was collected in two 30-minute periods to measure urine flow and urine creatinine. Urinary CrCl was calculated from the formula: CrCl (mL/min/1.73m2)=(urine volume×urine creatinine×1.73)/(serum creatinine×30 min×body surface area).ResultsThe within-group error was lower for GFR51Cr-EDTA than the urinary CrCl method, 7.2% versus 55.0%. The between-method bias was 2.6, 11.6, 11.1 and 7.39 ml/min for eGFRCrCl, eGFRMDRD, eGFRCKD-EPI and eGFRCG, respectively, when compared to GFR51Cr-EDTA. The error was 103%, 68.7%, 67.7% and 68.0% for eGFRCrCl, eGFRMDRD, eGFRCKD-EPI and eGFRCG, respectively, when compared to GFR51Cr-EDTA.ConclusionsThe study demonstrated poor precision of the commonly utilized urinary CrCl method for assessment of GFR in critically ill patients with early AKI, suggesting that this should not be used as a reference method when validating new methods for assessing kidney function in this patient population. The commonly used estimating equations perform poorly when estimating GFR, with high biases and unacceptably high errors.
| S-EPMC4056314 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDetermining kidney function in critically ill patients is paramount for the dose adjustment of several medications. When assessing kidney function, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is generally estimated either by calculating urine creatinine clearance (UCrCl) or using a predictive equation. Unfortunately, all predictive equations have been derived for medical outpatients. Therefore, the validity of predictive equations is of concern when compared with that of the UCrCl method, particularly in medical critically ill patients. Therefore, we conducted this study to assess the agreement of the estimated GFR (eGFR) using common predictive equations and UCrCl in medical critical care setting.MethodsThis was the secondary analysis of a nutrition therapy study. Urine was collected from participating patients over 24 h for urine creatinine, urine nitrogen, urine volume, and serum creatinine measurements on days 1, 3, 5, and 14 of the study. Subsequently, we calculated UCrCl and eGFR using four predictive equations, the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula, the four and six-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD-4 and MDRD-6) equations, and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. The correlation and agreement between eGFR and UCrCl were determined using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot with multiple measurements per subject, respectively. The performance of each predictive equation for estimating GFR was reported as bias, precision, and absolute percentage error (APE).ResultsA total of 49 patients with 170 urine samples were included in the final analysis. Of 49 patients, the median age was 74 (21-92) years-old and 49% was male. All patients were hemodynamically stable with mean arterial blood pressure of 82 (65-108) mmHg. Baseline serum creatinine was 0.93 (0.3-4.84) mg/dL and baseline UCrCl was 46.69 (3.40-165.53) mL/min. The eGFR from all the predictive equations showed modest correlation with UCrCl (r: 0.692 to 0.759). However, the performance of all the predictive equations in estimating GFR compared to that of UCrCl was poor, demonstrating bias ranged from -8.36 to -31.95 mL/min, precision ranged from 92.02 to 166.43 mL/min, and an unacceptable APE (23.01% to 47.18%). Nevertheless, the CG formula showed the best performance in estimating GFR, with a small bias (-2.30 (-9.46 to 4.86) mL/min) and an acceptable APE (14.72% (10.87% to 23.80%)), especially in patients with normal UCrCl.ConclusionFrom our finding, CG formula was the best eGFR formula in the medical critically ill patients, which demonstrated the least bias and acceptable APE, especially in normal UCrCl patients. However, the predictive equation commonly used to estimate GFR in critically ill patients must be cautiously applied due to its large bias, wide precision, and unacceptable error, particularly in renal function impairment.
| S-EPMC9165591 | biostudies-literature