Societies of strangers do not speak less complex languages.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Many recent proposals claim that languages adapt to their environments. The linguistic niche hypothesis claims that languages with numerous native speakers and substantial proportions of nonnative speakers (societies of strangers) tend to lose grammatical distinctions. In contrast, languages in small, isolated communities should maintain or expand their grammatical markers. Here, we test these claims using a global dataset of grammatical structures, Grambank. We model the impact of the number of native speakers, the proportion of nonnative speakers, the number of linguistic neighbors, and the status of a language on grammatical complexity while controlling for spatial and phylogenetic autocorrelation. We deconstruct "grammatical complexity" into two separate dimensions: how much morphology
SUBMITTER: Shcherbakova O
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10431698 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA