Dataset Information

The quality of malaria case management in different transmission settings in Tanzania mainland, 2017-2018.

ABSTRACT: Tanzania is undergoing an epidemiological transition for malaria transmission with some areas of the country having <10% (hypoendemic) and other areas 10% - 50% malaria prevalence (mesoendemic). It is not known whether there is a difference in the quality of malaria case management based on endemicity in Tanzania mainland. We examined the influence of endemicity on the quality of malaria case management at health facilities. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1713 health facilities in Tanzania mainland, using data collected by the National Malaria Control Program through an assessment tool to evaluate quality of malaria case management. The data was gathered from September 2017 to December 2018. Using standard quality factors, mean scores from facilities in the different endemicity regions were compared by a Student's t-test. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association between facility performance (score) and endemicity (mesoendemic vs. hypoendemic). Facilities in mesoendemic regions scored higher than those in hypoendemic regions on the overall quality of services [difference in mean scores ([Formula: see text]) = 2.52; (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.12, 3.91)], site readiness [[Formula: see text] = 2.97; (95% CI 1.30, 4.61)], availability of malaria reference materials [[Formula: see text] = 4.91; (95% CI 2.05, 7.76)], availability of Health Management Information System tools [[Formula: see text] = 5.86; (95% CI 3.80, 7.92)] and patient satisfaction [[Formula: see text] = 6.61; (95% CI 3.75, 9.48)]. Predictors associated with lower facility scores included; being located in a hypoendemic region [β: -2.49; (95% CI -3.83, -1.15)] and urban area [β: -3.84; (95% CI -5.60, -2.08)]. These findings highlight the differences in quality of malaria case management based on endemicity, but there is still a need to target improvement efforts in underperforming facilities, regardless of endemicity.

SUBMITTER: Hussein AK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10441786 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The quality of malaria case management in different transmission settings in Tanzania mainland, 2017-2018.

Hussein Ally Kassim AK Tarimo Donath D Reaves Erik J EJ Chacky Frank F Abade Ahmed Mohamed AM Mwalimu Charles Dismas CD Mohamed Ally A Nasser Ahlam A Kishimba Rogath Saika RS

PLOS global public health 20230821 8

Tanzania is undergoing an epidemiological transition for malaria transmission with some areas of the country having <10% (hypoendemic) and other areas 10% - 50% malaria prevalence (mesoendemic). It is not known whether there is a difference in the quality of malaria case management based on endemicity in Tanzania mainland. We examined the influence of endemicity on the quality of malaria case management at health facilities. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1713 health facilities in Ta ...[more]

PMID: 37603541

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is recommended by the World Health Organization for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is the most widely adopted first-line ACT for uncomplicated malaria in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including mainland Tanzania, where it was introduced in December 2006. The WHO recommends regular assessment to monitor the efficacy of the first-line treatment specifically considering that artemisinin partial resistance was reported in Greater Mekong sub-region and has been confirmed in East Africa (Rwanda and Uganda). The main aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of AL for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in mainland Tanzania.MethodsA single-arm prospective anti-malarial drug efficacy trial was conducted in Kibaha, Mlimba, Mkuzi, and Ujiji (in Pwani, Morogoro, Tanga, and Kigoma regions, respectively) in 2018. The sample size of 88 patients per site was determined based on WHO 2009 standard protocol. Participants were febrile patients (documented axillary temperature ≥ 37.5 °C and/or history of fever during the past 24 h) aged 6 months to 10 years. Patients received a 6-dose AL regimen by weight twice a day for 3 days. Clinical and parasitological parameters were monitored during 28 days of follow-up to evaluate the drug efficacy and safety.ResultsA total of 653 children were screened for uncomplicated malaria and 349 (53.7%) were enrolled between April and August 2018. Of the enrolled children, 345 (98.9%) completed the 28 days of follow-up or attained the treatment outcomes. There were no early treatment failures, but recurrent infections were higher in Mkuzi (35.2%) and Ujiji (23%). By Kaplan-Meier analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) uncorrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) ranged from 63.4% in Mkuzi to 85.9% in Mlimba, while PCR-corrected ACPR on day 28 varied from 97.6% in Ujiji to 100% in Mlimba. The drug was well tolerated; the commonly reported adverse events were cough, runny nose, and abdominal pain. No serious adverse event was reported.ConclusionThis study showed that AL had adequate efficacy and safety for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. The high number of recurrent infections were mainly due to new infections, indicating the necessity of utilizing alternative artemisinin-based combinations, such as artesunate amodiaquine, which provide a significantly longer post-treatment prophylactic effect.

Project description:BackgroundUnderstanding the key characteristics of malaria testing and treatment is essential to the control of a disease that continues to pose a major risk of morbidity and mortality in mainland Tanzania, with evidence of a resurgence of the disease in recent years. The introduction of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) as the first-line treatment for malaria, alongside policies to promote rational case management following testing, highlights the need for evidence of anti-malarial and testing markets in the country. The results of the most recent mainland Tanzania ACTwatch outlet survey are presented here, including data on the availability, market share and price of anti-malarials and malaria diagnosis in 2016.MethodsA nationally-representative malaria outlet survey was conducted between 18th May and 2nd July, 2016. A census of public and private outlets with potential to distribute malaria testing and/or treatment was conducted among a representative sample of administrative units. An audit was completed for all anti-malarials, malaria rapid (RDT) diagnostic tests and microscopy.ResultsA total of 5867 outlets were included in the nationally representative survey, across both public and private sectors. In the public sector, availability of malaria testing was 92.3% and quality-assured (QA) ACT was 89.1% among all screened outlets. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) was stocked by 51.8% of the public sector and injectable artesunate was found in 71.4% of all screened public health facilities. Among anti-malarial private-sector stockists, availability of testing was 15.7, and 65.1% had QA ACT available. The public sector accounted for 83.4% of the total market share for malaria diagnostics. The private sector accounted for 63.9% of the total anti-malarial market, and anti-malarials were most commonly distributed through accredited drug dispensing outlets (ADDOs) (39.0%), duka la dawa baridi (DLDBs) (13.3%) and pharmacies (6.7%). QA ACT comprised 33.1% of the national market share (12.2% public sector and 20.9% private sector). SP accounted for 53.3% of the total market for anti-malarials across both private and public sectors (31.3 and 22.0% of the total market, respectively). The median price per adult equivalent treatment dose (AETD) of QA ACT in the private sector was $1.40, almost 1.5 times more expensive than the median price per AETD of SP ($1.05). In the private sector, 79.3% of providers perceived ACT to be the most effective treatment for uncomplicated malaria for adults and 88.4% perceived this for children.ConclusionsWhile public sector preparedness for appropriate malaria testing and case management is showing encouraging signs, QA ACT availability and market share in the private sector continues to be sub-optimal for most outlet types. Furthermore, it is concerning that SP continues to predominate in the anti-malarial market. The reasons for this remain unclear, but are likely to be in part related to price, availability and provider knowledge or preferences. Continued efforts to implement government policy around malaria diagnosis and case management should be encouraged.

Project description:BackgroundDespite implementation of effective interventions in the past two decades, malaria is still a major public health problem in Tanzania. This study assessed the prevalence and drivers of malaria infections among symptomatic and asymptomatic members of selected communities from five regions with varying endemicity in mainland Tanzania.MethodsA cross-sectional community survey was conducted in five districts, including one district/region in Kagera, Kigoma, Njombe, Ruvuma and Tanga from July to August 2023. Participants aged ≥ 6 months were recruited and tested using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Demographic, anthropometric, clinical, parasitological, type of house, and socio-economic status (SES) data were captured using structured questionnaires. Associations between parasite prevalence and potential drivers were determined by logistic regression, and the results were presented as crude (cOR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsAmong 10,228 individuals tested, 3515 (34.4%) had positive results by RDTs. The prevalence of malaria varied from 21.6% in Tanga to 44.4% in Kagera, and from 14.4% to 68.5% among the different villages (P < 0.001). The odds of malaria infections were higher in males (aOR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.19-1.48, P < 0.001), under-fives (aOR = 2.02, 95% CI 1.74-2.40, P < 0.001), schoolchildren [aged 5-9 years (aOR = 3.23, 95% CI 1.19-1.48, P < 0.001) and 10-14 years (aOR = 3.53, 95% CI 3.03-4.11, P < 0.001)], and non-bednet users (aOR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.29-1.72, P < 0.001). Individuals from households with low SES (aOR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.16-1.69, P < 0.001), or living in houses with open windows (aOR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.06-1.45, P < 0.001) and/or holes on the walls (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.81, P < 0.001) also had higher odds.ConclusionsMalaria prevalence varied widely across regions and villages, and the odds of infections were higher in males, schoolchildren, non-bednet users, and individuals with low SES or living in houses with open windows and/or holes on the walls. The identified vulnerable groups and hotspots should be targeted with specific interventions to reduce the disease burden and support the ongoing malaria elimination efforts in Tanzania.

Dataset Information

The quality of malaria case management in different transmission settings in Tanzania mainland, 2017-2018.

Publications

The quality of malaria case management in different transmission settings in Tanzania mainland, 2017-2018.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets