Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: The Journal Impact Factor is often used as a proxy measure for journal quality, but the empirical evidence is scarce. In particular, it is unclear how peer review characteristics for a journal relate to its impact factor. We analysed 10,000 peer review reports submitted to 1,644 biomedical journals with impact factors ranging from 0.21 to 74.7. Two researchers hand-coded sentences using categories of content related to the thoroughness of the review (Materials and Methods, Presentation and Reporting, Results and Discussion, Importance and Relevance) and helpfulness (Suggestion and Solution, Examples, Praise, Criticism). We fine-tuned and validated transformer machine learning language models to classify sentences. We then examined the association between the number and percentage of senten
SUBMITTER: Severin A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10464996 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA