Evaluation of randomized controlled trials: a primer and tutorial for mental health researchers.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Considered one of the highest levels of evidence, results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain an essential building block in mental health research. They are frequently used to confirm that an intervention "works" and to guide treatment decisions. Given their importance in the field, it is concerning that the quality of many RCT evaluations in mental health research remains poor. Common errors range from inadequate missing data handling and inappropriate analyses (e.g., baseline randomization tests or analyses of within-group changes) to unduly interpretations of trial results and insufficient reporting. These deficiencies pose a threat to the robustness of mental health research and its impact on patient care. Many of these issues may be avoided in the future

SUBMITTER: Harrer M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10469910 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature