Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Proficient Mismatch Repair (pMMR)/ Non-Microsatellite Instability-High (non-MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer: a study based on 39 cohorts incorporating 1723 patients.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-based therapy in proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/non-microsatellite instability-high (non-MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods

Electronic databases were screened to identify relevant trials. The primary endpoints were pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Stratified analysis was accomplished on ICIs-based regimens, treatment lines and RAS status.

Results

Totally, 1723 mCRC patients from 39 cohorts were included. The pooled ORR, DCR, 12-month overall survival (OS) rate and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate of ICIs-based therapy in pMMR/non-MSI-H mCRC were 8.5% (95% CI: 4.4%-13.5%), 48.2% (95% CI: 37.8%-58.6%), 52.3% (95% CI: 46.4%-58.1%) and 32.8% (95% CI: 23.5%-42.7%) respectively. As a whole, no significantly differences were shown between ICIs-based and non-ICIs-based therapy for pMMR/non-MSI-H mCRC in terms of both PFS (HR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9-1.1, P = 0.91) and OS (HR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9-1.2, P = 0.51). It was worth noting that the addition of ICIs to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent plus chemotherapy displayed excellent efficacy in pMMR/non-MSI-H mCRC (ORR = 42.4%, 95% CI: 10.0%-78.6%; DCR = 92.0%, 95% CI: 68.3%-100.0%; 12-month OS rate = 71.4%, 95% CI: 50.0%-89.1%; 6-month PFS rate = 55.2%, 95% CI: 24.8%-83.8%; and PFS (compared with non-ICIs-based therapy): HR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8-1.0, P = 0.02), especially served as first-line therapy (ORR = 74.2%, 95% CI: 61.4%-85.4%; DCR = 98.7%, 95% CI: 92.0%-100.0%); and without additional treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed.

Conclusions

ICIs-based combination therapy, especially the addition of ICIs to first-line anti-VEGF agent plus chemotherapy, is promising in pMMR/non-MSI-H mCRC with good efficacy and controllable toxicity.

SUBMITTER: Wu Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10472580 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Proficient Mismatch Repair (pMMR)/ Non-Microsatellite Instability-High (non-MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer: a study based on 39 cohorts incorporating 1723 patients.

Wu Qing Q Wang Ziming Z Luo Yang Y Xie Xianhe X

BMC immunology 20230901 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-based therapy in proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/non-microsatellite instability-high (non-MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).<h4>Methods</h4>Electronic databases were screened to identify relevant trials. The primary endpoints were pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Stratified analysis was accomplished on ICIs-based regimens, treatment ...[more]

PMID: 37658314

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNeoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIT) has been endorsed by clinical guidelines for the management of DNA mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Nonetheless, the therapeutic efficacy of NIT in mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) non-metastatic rectal cancer (RC) remain pending matters. Therefore, a meta-analysis was carried out to assess the efficacy and safety of NIT in patients with non-metastatic pMMR/MSS RC.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, ASCO and ESMO were searched to obtain related studies up to July 2024. Two reviewers independently screened the included articles and extracted the pertinent data. The risk of publication bias was assessed by Begg or Egger tests and in cases of publication bias, the trim and fill method was applied. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics.ResultsThirteen articles including 582 eligible patients were analyzed. The pooled pCR, MPR, cCR and anus preservation rate were 37%, 57%, 26% and 77% separately and the incidence of irAEs≥3 grades and TRAEs≥3 grades were 3% and 29%, respectively. Non-metastatic pMMR/MSS RC receiving the short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) in neoadjuvant setting exhibited superior pooled pCR and MPR than long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) without upregulating the incidence of adverse effects. Furthermore, patients with MSS RC underwent neoadjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated higher pooled pCR, MPR, cCR compared to those receiving PD-L1 inhibitors. Additionally, yielded improved pooled MPR and anal preservation rates compared to sequential immuno-radiotherapy (63.4% vs 51.2% and 88.5% vs 69.9%), without raising the incidence of irAEs≥3 grade. Interestingly, RC patients with lymph node metastasis showed a higher pooled pCR than those without lymph node metastasis (43% vs 35%).ConclusionNIT was linked to favorable response rates and anal preservation, alongside an acceptable safety profile. Non-metastatic pMMR/MSS RC patients receiving SCRT, PD-1 inhibitors, or concurrent immuno-radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting exhibited enhanced outcomes. This meta-analysis provides evidence for further exploration and application of NIT in non-metastatic pMMR/MSS RC and highlights the potential for organ preservation with this approach. The relatively small sample size and the uneven quality of included studies may have had some impact on the generality of the results. Therefore, further analysis with a higher number of high-quality studies is needed to verify the conclusions.Systematic review registrationhttps://inplasy.com/, identifier: INPLASY202470110.

Project description:BackgroundMismatch-repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) status has therapeutic implications in endometrial cancer (EC). The authors evaluated the concordance of testing and factors contributing to MMR expression heterogeneity.MethodsSix hundred sixty-six ECs were characterized using immunohistochemistry (IHC), MSI testing, and mut-L homolog 1 (MLH1) methylation. Select samples underwent whole-transcriptome analysis and next-generation sequencing. MMR expression of metastatic/recurrent sites was evaluated.ResultsMSI testing identified 27.3% of cases as MSI-high (n = 182), MMR IHC identified 25.1% cases as MMR-deficient (n = 167), and 3.8% of cases (n = 25) demonstrated discordant results. A review of IHC staining explained discordant results in 18 cases, revealing subclonal loss of MLH1/Pms 1 homolog 2 (PMS2) (n = 10) and heterogeneous MMR IHC (mut-S homolog 6 [MSH6], n = 7; MLH1/PMS2, n = 1). MSH6-associated Lynch syndrome was diagnosed in three of six cases with heterogeneous expression. Subclonal or heterogeneous cases had a 38.9% recurrence rate (compared with 16.7% in complete MMR-deficient cases and 9% in MMR-proficient cases) and had abnormal MMR IHC results in all metastatic recurrent sites (n = 7). Tumors with subclonal MLH1/PMS2 demonstrated 74 differentially expressed genes (determined using digital spatial transcriptomics) when stratified by MLH1 expression, including many associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition.ConclusionsSubclonal/heterogeneous MMR IHC cases showed epigenetic loss in 66.7%, germline mutations in 16.7%, and somatic mutations in 16.7%. MMR IHC reported as intact/deficient missed 21% of cases of Lynch syndrome. EC with subclonal/heterogeneous MMR expression demonstrated a high recurrence rate, and metastatic/recurrent sites were MMR-deficient. Transcriptional analysis indicated an increased risk for migration/metastasis, suggesting that clonal MMR deficiency may be a driver for tumor aggressiveness. Reporting MMR IHC only as intact/deficient, without reporting subclonal and heterogeneous staining, misses opportunities for biomarker-directed therapy.Plain language summaryEndometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer, and 20%-40% of tumors have a defect in DNA proofreading known as mismatch-repair (MMR) deficiency. These results can be used to guide therapy. Tests for this defect can yield differing results, revealing heterogeneous (mixed) proofreading capabilities. Tumors with discordant testing results and mixed MMR findings can have germline or somatic defects in MMR genes. Cells with deficient DNA proofreading in tumors with mixed MMR findings have DNA expression profiles linked to more aggressive characteristics and cancer spread. These MMR-deficient cells may drive tumor behavior and the risk of spreading cancer.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Proficient Mismatch Repair (pMMR)/ Non-Microsatellite Instability-High (non-MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer: a study based on 39 cohorts incorporating 1723 patients.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Proficient Mismatch Repair (pMMR)/ Non-Microsatellite Instability-High (non-MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer: a study based on 39 cohorts incorporating 1723 patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets