Dataset Information

Urban-Rural Differences in Health Care Utilization for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the USA, 2017.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Urban-rural differences in IBD-specific health care utilization at the national level have not been examined in the USA.

Aims

We compared urban and rural rates of IBD-related office visits and IBD-specific (Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC)) hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits.

Methods

From multiple national data sources, we compared national rates using Z test and compared estimates of patient and hospital characteristics and hospitalization outcomes between urban and rural areas using Chi-square and t tests.

Results

In 2015 and 2016, digestive disease-related office visit rates, per 100 adults, were 3.1 times higher in urban than in rural areas (8.7 vs 2.8, P < 0.001). In 2017, age-adjusted rates per 100,000 adults were significantly higher in rural than urban areas for CD-specific hospitalizations (26.3 vs 23.6, P = 0.03) and ED visits (49.3 vs 39.5, P = 0.002). Compared with their urban counterparts, rural adults hospitalized for CD or UC in 2017 were more likely to be older and non-Hispanic white, have lower household income, Medicare coverage, and an elective admission, and were discharged from hospitals that were large, non-federal government owned, and in the Midwest or South. There were no significant urban-rural differences in length of stay and 30-day readmission rate.

Conclusions

While IBD or digestive disease-related office visit rates were lower in rural compared to urban areas, CD-specific hospitalization and ED visit rates were higher. Strategies that improve office-based care among rural patients with IBD may help to avoid more costly forms of health care use.

SUBMITTER: Xu F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10478171 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Urban-Rural Differences in Health Care Utilization for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the USA, 2017.

Xu Fang F Carlson Susan A SA Liu Yong Y Greenlund Kurt J KJ

Digestive diseases and sciences 20211011 8

<h4>Background</h4>Urban-rural differences in IBD-specific health care utilization at the national level have not been examined in the USA.<h4>Aims</h4>We compared urban and rural rates of IBD-related office visits and IBD-specific (Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC)) hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits.<h4>Methods</h4>From multiple national data sources, we compared national rates using Z test and compared estimates of patient and hospital characteristics and hosp ...[more]

PMID: 34633623

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract Background Rural dwellers with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) face barriers to accessing specialized health services. We aimed to contrast health care utilization between rural and urban residents diagnosed with IBD in Saskatchewan, Canada. Methods We completed a population-based retrospective study from 1998/1999 to 2017/2018 using administrative health databases. A validated algorithm was used to identify incident IBD cases aged 18+. Rural/urban residence was assigned at IBD diagnosis. Outpatient (gastroenterology visits, lower endoscopies, and IBD medications claims) and inpatient (IBD-specific and IBD-related hospitalizations, and surgeries for IBD) outcomes were measured after IBD diagnosis. Cox proportional hazard, negative binomial, and logistic models were used to evaluate associations adjusting by sex, age, neighbourhood income quintile, and disease type. Hazard ratios (HR), incidence rate ratios (IRR), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were reported. Results From 5,173 incident IBD cases, 1,544 (29.8%) were living in rural Saskatchewan at IBD diagnosis. Compared to urban dwellers, rural residents had fewer gastroenterology visits (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.77–0.88), were less likely to have a gastroenterologist as primary IBD care provider (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.51–0.70), and had lower endoscopies rates (IRR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87–0.98) and more 5-aminosalicylic acid claims (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02–1.18). Rural residents had a higher risk and rates of IBD-specific (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.13–1.34; IRR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.09–1.37) and IBD-related (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.11–1.31; IRR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.10–1.37) hospitalizations than their urban counterparts. Conclusion We identified rural-urban disparities in IBD health care utilization that reflect rural-urban inequities in the access to IBD care. These inequities require attention to promote health care innovation and equitable management of patients with IBD living in rural areas.

Project description:Importance:Although people living in rural areas of the United States are disproportionately older and more likely to die of conditions that require postacute care than those living in urban areas, rural-urban differences in postacute care utilization and outcomes have been understudied. Objective:To describe rural-urban differences in postacute care utilization and postdischarge outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants:This retrospective cohort study used data from Medicare beneficiaries 66 years and older admitted to 4738 US acute care hospitals for stroke, hip fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia between January 1, 2011, and September 30, 2015. Participants were tracked for 180 days after discharge. Data analyses were conducted between October 1, 2018, and May 30, 2019. Exposures:County of residence was classified as urban or rural using the US Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Rural counties were divided into those adjacent and not adjacent to urban counties. Main Outcomes and Measures:Primary outcomes were discharge to community vs a formal postacute care setting (ie, skilled nursing facility, home health care, or inpatient rehabilitation facility) and readmission and mortality within 30, 90, and 180 days of hospital discharge. Results:Among 2 044 231 hospitalizations from 2011 to 2015, 1 538 888 (75.2%; mean [SD] age, 80.4 [8.3] years; 866 540 [56.3%] women) were among patients from urban counties, 322 360 (15.8%; mean [SD] age, 79.6 [8.1] years; 175 806 [54.5%] women) were among patients from urban-adjacent rural counties, and 182 983 (9.0%; mean [SD] age, 79.8 [8.1] years; 98 775 [54.0%] women) were among patients from urban-nonadjacent rural counties. The probability of discharge to community without postacute care did not differ by rurality. However, compared with patients from urban counties, patients from the most rural counties were more frequently discharged to a skilled nursing facility (adjusted difference, 3.5 [95% CI, 2.8-4.3] percentage points), while discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility was less common among patients from rural counties than among those from urban counties (urban vs urban-adjacent rural: adjusted difference, -1.9 [95% CI, -2.4 to -1.4] percentage points; urban vs urban-nonadjacent rural: adjusted difference, -1.8 [95% CI, -2.4 to -1.2] percentage points) as was discharge to home health care (urban vs urban-adjacent rural: adjusted difference, -1.7 [95% CI, -2.3 to -1.2] percentage points; urban vs urban-nonadjacent rural: adjusted difference, -2.4 [95% CI, -3.0 to -1.8]). For patients from the most rural counties, adjusted 30-day readmission rates were 0.4 (95% CI, 0.2-0.6) percentage points higher than those of patients from urban counties among those who were discharged to the community but 0.3 (95% CI, -0.6 to -0.1) percentage points lower among patients receiving postacute care. Adjusted 30-day mortality rates were 0.4 (95% CI, 0.3-0.5) percentage points higher for patients from the most rural counties discharged to the community and 2.0 (95% CI, -1.7 to 2.3) percentage points higher among those receiving postacute care. Rural-urban differences in 90-day and 180-day outcomes were similar. Conclusions and Relevance:These findings suggest that rates of discharge to the community and postacute care settings were similar among patients from rural and urban counties. Rural-urban differences in mortality following discharge were much larger for patients receiving postacute care compared with patients discharged to the community setting. Improving postacute care in rural areas may reduce rural-urban disparities in patient outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundHealth disparities exist between urban and rural populations, yet research on rural-urban disparities in temperature-mortality relationships is limited. As inequality in the United States increases, understanding urban-rural and regional differences in the temperature-mortality association is crucial.ObjectiveWe examined regional and urban-rural differences of the temperature-mortality association in North Carolina (NC), USA, and investigated potential effect modifiers.MethodsWe applied time-series models allowing nonlinear temperature-mortality associations for 17 years (2000-2016) to generate heat and cold county-specific estimates. We used second-stage analysis to quantify the overall effects. We also explored potential effect modifiers (e.g. social associations, greenness) using stratified analysis. The analysis considered relative effects (comparing risks at 99th to 90th temperature percentiles based on county-specific temperature distributions for heat, and 1st to 10th percentiles for cold) and absolute effects (comparing risks at specific temperatures).ResultsWe found null effects for heat-related mortality (relative effect: 1.001 (95% CI: 0.995-1.007)). Overall cold-mortality risk for relative effects was 1.019 (1.015-1.023). All three regions had statistically significant cold-related mortality risks for relative and absolute effects (relative effect: 1.019 (1.010-1.027) for Coastal Plains, 1.021 (1.015-1.027) for Piedmont, 1.014 (1.006-1.023) for Mountains). The heat mortality risk was not statistically significant, whereas the cold mortality risk was statistically significant, showing higher cold-mortality risks in urban areas than rural areas (relative effect for heat: 1.006 (0.997-1.016) for urban, 1.002 (0.988-1.017) for rural areas; relative effect for cold: 1.023 (1.017-1.030) for urban, 1.012 (1.001-1.023) for rural areas). Findings are suggestive of higher relative cold risks in counties with the less social association, higher population density, less green-space, higher PM2.5, lower education level, higher residential segregation, higher income inequality, and higher income (e.g., Ratio of Relative Risks 1.72 (0.68, 4.35) comparing low to high education).ConclusionResults indicate cold-mortality risks in NC, with potential differences by regional, urban-rural areas, and community characteristics.

Dataset Information

Urban-Rural Differences in Health Care Utilization for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the USA, 2017.

Background

Aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Urban-Rural Differences in Health Care Utilization for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the USA, 2017.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets