Epigenetic regulator genes direct lineage switching in MLL/AF4 leukemia.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Tirtakusuma R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10488321 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Epigenetic regulator genes direct lineage switching in MLL/AF4 leukemia.
Tirtakusuma Ricky R Szoltysek Katarzyna K Milne Paul P Grinev Vasily V VV Ptasinska Anetta A Chin Paulynn S PS Meyer Claus C Nakjang Sirintra S Hehir-Kwa Jayne Y JY Williamson Daniel D Cauchy Pierre P Keane Peter P Assi Salam A SA Ashtiani Minoo M Kellaway Sophie G SG Imperato Maria R MR Vogiatzi Fotini F Schweighart Elizabeth K EK Lin Shan S Wunderlich Mark M Stutterheim Janine J Komkov Alexander A Zerkalenkova Elena E Evans Paul P McNeill Hesta H Elder Alex A Martinez-Soria Natalia N Fordham Sarah E SE Shi Yuzhe Y Russell Lisa J LJ Pal Deepali D Smith Alex A Kingsbury Zoya Z Becq Jennifer J Eckert Cornelia C Haas Oskar A OA Carey Peter P Bailey Simon S Skinner Roderick R Miakova Natalia N Collin Matthew M Bigley Venetia V Haniffa Muzlifah M Marschalek Rolf R Harrison Christine J CJ Cargo Catherine A CA Schewe Denis D Olshanskaya Yulia Y Thirman Michael J MJ Cockerill Peter N PN Mulloy James C JC Blair Helen J HJ Vormoor Josef J Allan James M JM Bonifer Constanze C Heidenreich Olaf O Bomken Simon S
Blood 20221001 17
The fusion gene MLL/AF4 defines a high-risk subtype of pro-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Relapse can be associated with a lineage switch from acute lymphoblastic to acute myeloid leukemia, resulting in poor clinical outcomes caused by resistance to chemotherapies and immunotherapies. In this study, the myeloid relapses shared oncogene fusion breakpoints with their matched lymphoid presentations and originated from various differentiation stages from immature progenitors through to committed B- ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:A chromosomal translocation, t(4;11)-(q21;q23), is associated with an aggressive mixed-lineage leukemia. A yeast artificial chromosome was used to clone the chromosomal breakpoint of this translocation in the RS4;11 cell line. The breakpoint sequences revealed an inverted repeat bordered by a consensus site for topoisomerase II binding and cleavage as well as chi-like elements. The der(11) chromosome encodes a fusion RNA and predicted chimeric protein between the 11q23 gene MLL and a 4q21 gene designated AF4. The sequence of the complete open reading frame for this fusion transcript reveals the MLL protein to have homology with DNA methyltransferase, the Drosophila trithorax gene product, and the "AT-hook" motif of high-mobility-group proteins. An alternative splice that deletes the AT-hook region of MLL was identified. AF4 is a serine- and proline-rich putative transcription factor with a glutamine-rich carboxyl terminus. The composition of the complete MLL-AF4 fusion product argues that it may act through either a gain-of-function or a dominant negative mechanism in leukemogenesis.
| S-EPMC47247 | biostudies-other
Project description:Malignant transformation in a multipotential precursor has recently been shown to underlie mixed phenotype acute leukaemias. In contrast, and despite the conclusive demonstration that MLL-AF4 infant ALL arises in utero. In order to address this we purified haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) populations from four non-lineage switching presentation infant ALL cases and one ALL presentation which went on to lineage switch at relapse. The specific MLL-AF4 fusion event was determined in unsorted samples by LDI-PCR and identified in purified populations by nested PCR. In three cases where non-lineage restricted populations were able to be purified, MLL-AF4 was identified in the CD34+CD38-CD45RA+ population (LK228, LK230, LS01), the CD34+CD38-CD45RA-CD90- multipotential progenitor population (MPP, LS01) and even a candidate CD34+CD38-CD45RA-CD90+ haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) population (LK228) Interestingly, in a single non-switched MLL-AF9 case analysed for external comparison, the fusion was only identified in CD19+ blast/B cell populations, not in any HSPC population. Unexpectedly, we were also able to identify the presence of the MLL-AF4 fusion in apparently normally differentiated CD34-CD19/3-HLA-DR+CD14/11c+ monocytes/dendritic cells from the peripheral blood/bone marrow of 4/5 cases examined. This finding was further supported by single cell analysis of LS01PALL which identified the fusion in 2/22 CD34-CD19/3-HLA-DR+CD14/11c+ monocytes/dendritic cells analysed. Furthermore, the matched AML sample (LS01RAML) also contained MLL-AF4 positive mature T lymphoid cells. These data imply that MLL-AF4 does not impose a complete block on normal haematopoietic differentiation, and raise the question of what additional factors contribute to leukaemic lineage determination in the setting of the MLL-AF4 translocation. To examine the functional capacity of MLL-AF4 transformed precursor cells we generated a patient-derived xenograft model using NOD-scid/IL2Rγ-/- (NSG) mice. Serial xenotransplantation identified an MLL-AF4 positive clone persisting within the human CD34+CD38-CD45RA-CD90+ compartment across four generations of mice, confirming self-renewal of this population. Together these data identify an early multipotent progenitor or HSC as the putative cell of origin for MLL-AF4 ALL. Furthermore, they demonstrate that MLL-AF4, uniquely amongst MLL fusion genes, imposes a profound lymphoid bias on the developing leukemia but without completely abolishing broader, non-malignant, haematopoietic differentiation.
2020-04-21 | GSE132396 | GEO
Project description:Malignant transformation in a multipotential precursor has recently been shown to underlie mixed phenotype acute leukaemias. In contrast, and despite the conclusive demonstration that MLL-AF4 infant ALL arises in utero. In order to address this we purified haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) populations from four non-lineage switching presentation infant ALL cases and one ALL presentation which went on to lineage switch at relapse. The specific MLL-AF4 fusion event was determined in unsorted samples by LDI-PCR and identified in purified populations by nested PCR. In three cases where non-lineage restricted populations were able to be purified, MLL-AF4 was identified in the CD34+CD38-CD45RA+ population (LK228, LK230, LS01), the CD34+CD38-CD45RA-CD90- multipotential progenitor population (MPP, LS01) and even a candidate CD34+CD38-CD45RA-CD90+ haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) population (LK228) Interestingly, in a single non-switched MLL-AF9 case analysed for external comparison, the fusion was only identified in CD19+ blast/B cell populations, not in any HSPC population. Unexpectedly, we were also able to identify the presence of the MLL-AF4 fusion in apparently normally differentiated CD34-CD19/3-HLA-DR+CD14/11c+ monocytes/dendritic cells from the peripheral blood/bone marrow of 4/5 cases examined. This finding was further supported by single cell analysis of LS01PALL which identified the fusion in 2/22 CD34-CD19/3-HLA-DR+CD14/11c+ monocytes/dendritic cells analysed. Furthermore, the matched AML sample (LS01RAML) also contained MLL-AF4 positive mature T lymphoid cells. These data imply that MLL-AF4 does not impose a complete block on normal haematopoietic differentiation, and raise the question of what additional factors contribute to leukaemic lineage determination in the setting of the MLL-AF4 translocation. To examine the functional capacity of MLL-AF4 transformed precursor cells we generated a patient-derived xenograft model using NOD-scid/IL2Rγ-/- (NSG) mice. Serial xenotransplantation identified an MLL-AF4 positive clone persisting within the human CD34+CD38-CD45RA-CD90+ compartment across four generations of mice, confirming self-renewal of this population. Together these data identify an early multipotent progenitor or HSC as the putative cell of origin for MLL-AF4 ALL. Furthermore, they demonstrate that MLL-AF4, uniquely amongst MLL fusion genes, imposes a profound lymphoid bias on the developing leukemia but without completely abolishing broader, non-malignant, haematopoietic differentiation.
2020-04-21 | GSE130142 | GEO
Project description:AbstractRNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are emerging as a novel class of therapeutic targets in cancer, including in leukemia, given their important role in posttranscriptional gene regulation, and have the unexplored potential to be combined with existing therapies. The RBP insulin-like growth factor 2 messenger RNA-binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3) has been found to be a critical regulator of MLL-AF4 leukemogenesis and represents a promising therapeutic target. Here, we study the combined effects of targeting IGF2BP3 and menin-MLL interaction in MLL-AF4-driven leukemia in vitro and in vivo, using genetic inhibition with CRISPR-Cas9-mediated deletion of Igf2bp3 and pharmacologic inhibition of the menin-MLL interaction with multiple commercially available inhibitors. Depletion of Igf2bp3 sensitized MLL-AF4 leukemia to the effects of menin-MLL inhibition on cell growth and leukemic initiating cells in vitro. Mechanistically, we found that both Igf2bp3 depletion and menin-MLL inhibition led to increased differentiation in vitro and in vivo, seen in functional readouts and by gene expression analyses. IGF2BP3 knockdown had a greater effect on increasing survival and attenuating disease than pharmacologic menin-MLL inhibition with small molecule MI-503 alone and showed enhanced antileukemic effects in combination. Our work shows that IGF2BP3 is an oncogenic amplifier of MLL-AF4-mediated leukemogenesis and a potent therapeutic target, providing a paradigm for targeting leukemia at both the transcriptional and posttranscriptional level.
| S-EPMC10824693 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The eleven-nineteen leukemia (ENL) protein family, composed of ENL and AF9, is a common component of 3 transcriptional modulators: AF4-ENL-P-TEFb complex (AEP), DOT1L-AF10-ENL complex (referred to as the DOT1L complex) and polycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1). Each complex associates with chromatin via distinct mechanisms, conferring different transcriptional properties including activation, maintenance, and repression. The mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) gene often fuses with ENL and AF10 family genes in leukemia. However, the functional interrelationship among those 3 complexes in leukemic transformation remains largely elusive. Here, we have shown that MLL-ENL and MLL-AF10 constitutively activate transcription by aberrantly inducing both AEP-dependent transcriptional activation and DOT1L-dependent transcriptional maintenance, mostly in the absence of PRC1, to fully transform hematopoietic progenitors. These results reveal a cooperative transcriptional activation mechanism of AEP and DOT1L and suggest a molecular rationale for the simultaneous inhibition of the MLL fusion-AF4 complex and DOT1L for more effective treatment of MLL-rearranged leukemia.
| S-EPMC5409830 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The most frequent MLL-gene rearrangement found in leukemia is a reciprocal translocation with AF4 on chromosome 4 resulting in the formation of the MLL-AF4 and the AF4-MLL fusion genes. The oncogenic role of MLL-AF4 is documented but the significance of the reciprocal product - AF4-MLL in leukemia is less clear. In the human leukemia cell lines - RS4;11 and SEMK2-M1, both of which express MLL-AF4 and AF4-MLL, we knocked down the expression of AF4-MLL using siRNA. Loss of AF4-MLL had no effect on the growth of either RS4;11 or SEMK2-M1 cells. Furthermore, in SEMK2-M1 cells there were no changes in cell cycle or apoptosis with loss of AF4-MLL. In contrast, knockdown of MLL-AF4 significantly inhibited growth of both RS4;11 and SEMK2-M1. Additionally, in SEMK2-M1 cells, loss of MLL-AF4 led to G2/M cell cycle arrest and increased apoptosis. Overall, these results demonstrate that in t(4;11) leukemia, the MLL-AF4 fusion protein is critical for leukemia cell proliferation and survival while the AF4-MLL fusion product is dispensable.
| S-EPMC3011030 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Chromosome rearrangements involving the mixed-lineage leukemia gene (MLL) create MLL-fusion proteins, which could drive both acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The lineage decision of MLL-fusion leukemia is influenced by the fusion partner and microenvironment. To investigate the interplay of fusion proteins and microenvironment in lineage choice, we transplanted human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) expressing MLL-AF9 or MLL-Af4 into immunodeficient NSGS mice, which strongly promote myeloid development. Cells expressing MLL-AF9 efficiently developed AML in NSGS mice. In contrast, MLL-Af4 cells, which were fully oncogenic under lymphoid conditions present in NSG mice, displayed compromised transformation capacity in a myeloid microenvironment. MLL-Af4 activated a self-renewal program in a lineage-dependent manner, showing the leukemogenic activity of MLL-Af4 was interlinked with lymphoid lineage commitment. The C-terminal homology domain (CHD) of Af4 was sufficient to confer this linkage. Although the MLL-CHD fusion protein failed to immortalize HSPCs in myeloid conditions in vitro, it could successfully induce ALL in NSG mice. Our data suggest that defective self-renewal ability and leukemogenesis of MLL-Af4 myeloid cells could contribute to the strong B-cell ALL association of MLL-AF4 leukemia observed in the clinic.
| S-EPMC5561902 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Circular RNAs (circRNAs) represent a type of endogenous noncoding RNAs that are generated by back-splicing events and favor repetitive sequences. Recent studies have reported that cancer-associated chromosomal translocations could juxtapose distant complementary repetitive intronic sequences, resulting in the aberrant formation of circRNAs. However, among the reported fusion genes, only a small number of circRNAs were found to originate from fusion regions during gene translocation. We question if circRNAs could also originate from fusion partners during gene translocation. METHODS:Firstly, we designed divergent primers for qRT-PCR to identify a circRNA circAF4 in AF4 gene and investigated the expression pattern in different types of leukemia samples. Secondly, we designed two small interfering RNAs specially targeting the back-spliced junction point of circAF4 for functional studies. CCK8 cell proliferation and cell cycle assay were performed, and a NOD-SCID mouse model was used to investigate the contribution of circAF4 in leukemogenesis. Finally, luciferase reporter assay, AGO2 RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP), and RNA Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) were performed to confirm the relationship of miR-128-3p, circAF4, and MLL-AF4 expression. RESULTS:We discovered a circRNA, named circAF4, originating from the AF4 gene, a partner of the MLL fusion gene in MLL-AF4 leukemia. We showed that circAF4 plays an oncogenic role in MLL-AF4 leukemia and promotes leukemogenesis in vitro and in vivo. More importantly, knockdown of circAF4 increases the leukemic cell apoptosis rate in MLL-AF4 leukemia cells, while no effect was observed in leukemia cells that do not carry the MLL-AF4 translocation. Mechanically, circAF4 can act as a miR-128-3p sponge, thereby releasing its inhibition on MLL-AF4 expression. We finally analyzed most of the MLL fusion genes loci and found that a number of circRNAs could originate from these partners, suggesting the potential roles of fusion gene partner-originating circRNAs (named as FP-circRNAs) in leukemia with chromosomal translocations. CONCLUSION:Our findings demonstrate that the abnormal elevated expression of circAF4 regulates the cell growth via the circAF4/miR-128-3p/MLL-AF4 axis, which could contribute to leukemogenesis, suggesting that circAF4 may be a novel therapeutic target of MLL-AF4 leukemia.
| S-EPMC6798510 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Chromosomal translocations involving the mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) locus generate potent oncogenic fusion proteins (oncoproteins) that disrupt regulation of developmental gene expression. By profiling the oncoprotein-target sites of 36 broadly representative MLL-rearranged leukemia samples, including three samples that underwent a lymphoid-to-myeloid lineage-switching event in response to therapy, we find the genomic enrichment of the oncoprotein is highly variable between samples and subject to dynamic regulation. At high levels of expression, the oncoproteins preferentially activate either an acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) program, enriched for pro-B-cell genes, or an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) program, enriched for hematopoietic-stem-cell genes. The fusion-partner-specific-binding patterns over these gene sets are highly correlated with the prevalence of each mutation in ALL versus AML. In lineage-switching samples the oncoprotein levels are reduced and the oncoproteins preferentially activate granulocyte-monocyte progenitor (GMP) genes. In a sample that lineage switched during treatment with the menin inhibitor revumenib, the oncoprotein and menin are reduced to undetectable levels, but ENL, a transcriptional cofactor of the oncoprotein, persists on numerous oncoprotein-target loci, including genes in the GMP-like lineage-switching program. We propose MLL oncoproteins promote lineage-switching events through dynamic chromatin binding at lineage-specific target genes, and may support resistance to menin inhibitors through similar changes in chromatin occupancy.
| S-EPMC11522475 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The most frequent rearrangement of the human MLL gene fuses MLL to AF4 resulting in high-risk infant B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). MLL fusions are also hallmark oncogenic events in secondary acute myeloid leukemia. They are a direct consequence of mis-repaired DNA double strand breaks (DNA-DSBs) due to defects in the DNA damage response associated with exposure to topoisomerase-II poisons such as etoposide. It has been suggested that MLL fusions render cells susceptible to additional chromosomal damage upon exposure to etoposide. Conversely, the genome-wide mutational landscape in MLL-rearranged infant B-ALL has been reported silent. Thus, whether MLL fusions compromise the recognition and/or repair of DNA damage remains unanswered. Here, the fusion proteins MLL-AF4 (MA4) and AF4-MLL (A4M) were CRISPR/Cas9-genome edited in the AAVS1 locus of HEK293 cells as a model to study MLL fusion-mediated DNA-DSB formation/repair. Repair kinetics of etoposide- and ionizing radiation-induced DSBs was identical in WT, MA4- and A4M-expressing cells, as revealed by flow cytometry, by immunoblot for γH2AX and by comet assay. Accordingly, no differences were observed between WT, MA4- and A4M-expressing cells in the presence of master proteins involved in non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ; i.e.KU86, KU70), alternative-NHEJ (Alt-NHEJ; i.e.LigIIIa, WRN and PARP1), and homologous recombination (HR, i.e.RAD51). Moreover, functional assays revealed identical NHEJ and HR efficiency irrespective of the genotype. Treatment with etoposide consistently induced cell cycle arrest in S/G2/M independent of MA4/A4M expression, revealing a proper activation of the DNA damage checkpoints. Collectively, expression of MA4 or A4M does neither influence DNA signaling nor DNA-DSB repair.
| S-EPMC5058691 | biostudies-literature