Complex battlefields favor strong soldiers over large armies in social animal warfare.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: In social animals, success can depend on the outcome of group battles. Theoretical models of warfare predict that group fighting ability is proportional to two key factors: the strength of each soldier in the group and group size. The relative importance of these factors is predicted to vary across environments [F. W. Lanchester, Aircraft in Warfare, the Dawn of the Fourth Arm (1916)]. Here, we provide an empirical validation of the theoretical prediction that open environments should favor superior numbers, whereas complex environments should favor stronger soldiers [R. N. Franks, L. W. Partridge, Anim. Behav. 45, 197-199 (1993)]. We first demonstrate this pattern using simulated battles between relatively strong and weak soldiers in a computer-driven algorithm. We th
SUBMITTER: Lymbery SJ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10500280 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA