Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiological measurements of radial fracture position made in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) projection images are comparable to those made on traditional radiographs and could potentially substitute them.Methods
Sixteen patients with fractures of the distal radius referred for radiographs were recruited for an additional CBCT scan which was performed immediately afterwards. Projection images and volumetric data were saved from the CBCT scans. Measurements of ulnar variance, radial inclination and volar tilt were made from all three sets of images.Results
Agreement of projection image based measurements with radiographs was nearly as good as as the agreement of cross sectional image measurements with radiographs. The average difference between the results for projection images and radiographs were -1.2 mm (SD 1.9 mm), for radial inclination 0.7° (SD 2.9°) and for volar tilt 1.9° (SD 5.6°).Conclusion
Differences between radiological measurements between the modalities studied are small and projection images could be used for the assessment of distal radial fractures.
SUBMITTER: Bry K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10500865 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Bry Kristian K Kortesniemi Mika M Koivikko Mika M Kerttula Liisa L
BMC medical imaging 20230914 1
<h4>Background</h4>The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiological measurements of radial fracture position made in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) projection images are comparable to those made on traditional radiographs and could potentially substitute them.<h4>Methods</h4>Sixteen patients with fractures of the distal radius referred for radiographs were recruited for an additional CBCT scan which was performed immediately afterwards. Projection images and volumetric data ...[more]