Dataset Information

Long-course chemoradiation plus concurrent/sequential PD-1 blockade as neoadjuvant treatment for MMR-status-unscreened locally advanced rectal cancer: protocol of a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial (the POLAR-STAR trial).

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Recent preclinical studies have discovered unique synergism between radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, which has already brought significant survival benefit in lung cancer. In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors have also achieved surprisingly high pathological complete response (pCR) rates even in proficient mismatch-repair patients. As existing researches are all phase 2, single-cohort trials, we aim to conduct a randomised, controlled trial to further clarify the efficacy and safety of this novel combination therapy.

Methods and analysis

Eligible patients with LARC are randomised to three arms (two experiment arms, one control arm). Patients in all arms receive long-course radiotherapy plus concurrent capecitabine as neoadjuvant therapy, as well as radical surgery. Distinguishingly, patients in arm 1 also receive anti-PD-1 (Programmed Death 1) treatment starting at Day 8 of radiation (concurrent plan), and patients in arm 2 receive anti-PD-1 treatment starting 2 weeks after completion of radiation (sequential plan). Tislelizumab (anti-PD-1) is scheduled to be administered at 200 mg each time for three consecutive times, with 3-week intervals. Randomisation is stratified by different participating centres, with a block size of 6. The primary endpoint is pCR rate, and secondary endpoints include neoadjuvant-treatment-related adverse event rate, as well as disease-free and overall survival rates at 2, 3 and 5 years postoperation. Data will be analysed with an intention-to-treat approach.

Ethics and dissemination

This protocol has been approved by the institutional ethical committee of Beijing Friendship Hospital (the primary centre) with an identifying serial number of 2022-P2-050-01. Before publication to peer-reviewed journals, data of this research will be stored in a specially developed clinical trial database.

Trial registration number

NCT05245474.

SUBMITTER: Pang K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10503326 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Long-course chemoradiation plus concurrent/sequential PD-1 blockade as neoadjuvant treatment for MMR-status-unscreened locally advanced rectal cancer: protocol of a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial (the POLAR-STAR trial).

Pang Kai K Pang Kai K Yang Yun Y Tian Dan D Zeng Na N Cao Shun S Ling Shen S Gao Jiale J Zhao Pengfei P Wang Hao H Kong Yuanyuan Y Zhang Jie J Chen Guangyong G Deng Wei W Bai Zhigang Z Jin Lan L Wu Guoju G Zhu Danyang D Wang Yue Y Zhou Jiaolin J Wu Bin B Lin Guole G Xiao Yi Y Gao Zhidong Z Ye Yingjiang Y Wang Xin X Li Ang A Han Jiagang J Yao Hongwei H Yang Yingchi Y Zhang Zhongtao Z

BMJ open 20230912 9

<h4>Introduction</h4>Recent preclinical studies have discovered unique synergism between radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, which has already brought significant survival benefit in lung cancer. In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors have also achieved surprisingly high pathological complete response (pCR) rates even in proficient mismatch-repair patients. As existing researches are all phase 2, single-cohort trials, we ai ...[more]

PMID: 37699634

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe most detrimental effect of DNA damage from radiation is DNA double-strand breaks, making it critical to identify reliable biomarkers for treatment response in cancer therapy. Gamma-H2AX (γ-H2AX), a marker of DNA double-strand breaks, was evaluated in this study as a potential biomarker for treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT).MethodsThirty patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received preoperative CCRT. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected at five time points: baseline, 24 hours after the first radiation fraction, mid-treatment, end of treatment, and six weeks post-CCRT. γ-H2AX levels were measured in these samples. MRI was used to assess treatment response based on magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG). Patients were classified as responders or non-responders based on mrTRG. T-test and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) evaluated dynamic changes in γ-H2AX levels, and a multilevel linear regression model analyzed the relationship between γ-H2AX levels and treatment response.ResultsNineteen out of thirty patients (63.33%) were classified as responders. Significant dynamic changes in γ-H2AX levels were observed between non-responders and responders (P=0.01). The multilevel linear regression model showed a trend towards increased γ-H2AX levels in responders [1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.02 to 2.34, P=0.053]. Significant differences in γ-H2AX levels were observed from baseline to mid-treatment, end of treatment, and six weeks post-CCRT. Pathologic complete response (pCR) after CCRT was associated with significantly higher γ-H2AX ratios compared to those without pCR (P=0.04). However, no significant difference was identified in the multilevel linear regression model.Conclusionsγ-H2AX may have potential as a biomarker for treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative CCRT, although further validation is required.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation have an improved prognosis. The need for surgery in these patients has been questioned, but the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response is small. We aimed to assess whether adding cycles of mFOLFOX6 between chemoradiation and surgery increased the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response.MethodsWe did a phase 2, non-randomised trial consisting of four sequential study groups of patients with stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer at 17 institutions in the USA and Canada. All patients received chemoradiation (fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2) per day by continuous infusion throughout radiotherapy, and 45·0 Gy in 25 fractions, 5 days per week for 5 weeks, followed by a minimum boost of 5·4 Gy). Patients in group 1 had total mesorectal excision 6-8 weeks after chemoradiation. Patients in groups 2-4 received two, four, or six cycles of mFOLFOX6, respectively, between chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. Each cycle of mFOLFOX6 consisted of racemic leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) or 400 mg/m(2), according to the discretion of the treating investigator, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) in a 2-h infusion, bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, and a 46-h infusion of fluorouracil 2400 mg/m(2). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a pathological complete response, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00335816.FindingsBetween March 24, 2004, and Nov 16, 2012, 292 patients were registered, 259 of whom (60 in group 1, 67 in group 2, 67 in group 3, and 65 in group 4) met criteria for analysis. 11 (18%, 95% CI 10-30) of 60 patients in group 1, 17 (25%, 16-37) of 67 in group 2, 20 (30%, 19-42) of 67 in group 3, and 25 (38%, 27-51) of 65 in group 4 achieved a pathological complete response (p=0·0036). Study group was independently associated with pathological complete response (group 4 compared with group 1 odds ratio 3·49, 95% CI 1·39-8·75; p=0·011). In group 2, two (3%) of 67 patients had grade 3 adverse events associated with the neoadjuvant administration of mFOLFOX6 and one (1%) had a grade 4 adverse event; in group 3, 12 (18%) of 67 patients had grade 3 adverse events; in group 4, 18 (28%) of 65 patients had grade 3 adverse events and five (8%) had grade 4 adverse events. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events associated with the neoadjuvant administration of mFOLFOX6 across groups 2-4 were neutropenia (five in group 3 and six in group 4) and lymphopenia (three in group 3 and four in group 4). Across all study groups, 25 grade 3 or worse surgery-related complications occurred (ten in group 1, five in group 2, three in group 3, and seven in group 4); the most common were pelvic abscesses (seven patients) and anastomotic leaks (seven patients).InterpretationDelivery of mFOLFOX6 after chemoradiation and before total mesorectal excision has the potential to increase the proportion of patients eligible for less invasive treatment strategies; this strategy is being tested in phase 3 clinical trials.FundingNational Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute.

Project description:Objective: Insights about differences in tumor vasculature and how it reacts to VEGF inhibition is limited, but nevertheless of major relevance to anti-angiogenic therapy. In this study we therefore characterize the effect of bevacizumab combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and explore molecular and genetic markers for response prediction to this combination treatment. Material and Methods: In an academic multicentric randomized phase II study, patients with advanced rectal cancer have been treated with bevacizumab (5mg/kg) in combination with capecitabine (1650mg/m2/day) and radiotherapy (45Gy; 1.8Gy/day) with (50mg/m2) or without oxaliplatin prior to surgery. Of 59 patients, tumor tissue and blood samples were collected before treatment and after the first loading dose of bevacizumab but before CRT (week 3). First, cDNA micro-arrays were performed on the biopsies to investigate differences in gene expression of tumors from patients with and without a pathological complete response (pCR) before start of treatment and to identify biological processes affected by bevacizumab delivery. The paraffin embedded tissue was stained for blood vessels (CD31/CD34) combined with Î±-SMA (pericytes) and CA-IX (hypoxia). To explore candidate blood-based biomarkers ELISAâs were performed for PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, THBS-1, IL-8, CYR61 and Ang-2. The expression of all markers was correlated with the pathological response of the patients. Results: Differences in tumoral gene expression are observed between patients with and without a pCR, with the first response group presenting a more angiogenic phenotype before start of treatment and changes in angiogenic processes after bevacizumab delivery. One dose of bevacizumab leads to a decrease in the number of pericyte covered blood vessels, a decrease in circulating PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB and Thrombospondin-1. Patients showing a pCR having less pericyte covered blood vessels, more hypoxia, and less circulating PDGF-BB compared to patients who did not have a pCR after bevacizumab treatment with chemoradiation and bevacizumab. Conclusions: The translational data demonstrate that tumors with an angiogenic expression profile respond better to bevacizumab combined with CRT and points towards a possible role for PDGF, CA-IX and pericyte covered blood vessels for the early response prediction to this treatment. Our findings suggest a role for mural cell recruitment and vessel maturation for the susceptibility of the tumor vasculature to bevacizumab treatment. Further validation of our biological observations and hypothesis generating data in randomized trials is needed. This study involves samples of patients enrolled in the AXEbeam trail that were analysed by Primeview microarray (Affymetrix). Biopsies were taken at two different timepoints: before treatment (tumor and normal mucosa) and after the first loading dose of bevacizumab but before chemoradiation (only tumor, week 3). Patients were classified into two groups: with a complete pathological response at time of surgery (Responders=R) or non-responders (NR). For the responders, we collected 21 samples in total (7 tumor samples and 8 normal mucosa samples taken before treatment and 6 tumor samples collected at week 3). From the non-responders we had 26 samples in total (9 tumor and 10 mucosa samples before treatment and 7 tumor samples at week 3 after a single dose of bevacizumab). Microarrays were run in two batches (15xxx versus 16xxx CEL file samples; indicated in the description field). Three samples (NJ 04/003 T1, RVS 09/002 M and NJ 04/003 W3) were put twice on the array (15897+16789; 15893+16790; 15898+16791) to verify and exclude batch effects. Please note that, due to these three technical repeats the total number of microarray CEL files is 50 (21 Responders, 26 Non-responders and 3 repeats).

Project description:ImportanceThere is no current consensus on the role of chemotherapy in addition to radiation for postoperative adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer with adverse pathological factors.ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical benefits of sequential chemoradiation (SCRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) compared with radiation alone (RT) as a postoperative adjuvant treatment in early-stage cervical cancer.Design, setting, and participantsAfter radical hysterectomy at 1 of 8 participating hospitals in China, patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IB to IIA cervical cancer with adverse pathological factors were randomized 1:1:1 to receive adjuvant RT, CCRT, or SCRT. Data were collected from February 2008 to December 2018.InterventionsPatients received adjuvant RT (total dose, 45-50 Gy), CCRT (weekly cisplatin, 30-40 mg/m2), or SCRT (cisplatin, 60-75 mg/m2, plus paclitaxel, 135-175 mg/m2) in a 21-day cycle, given 2 cycles before and 2 cycles after radiotherapy, respectively.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was the rate of disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years.ResultsA total of 1048 women (median [range] age, 48 [23-65] years) were included in the analysis (350 in the RT group, 345 in the CCRT group, and 353 in the SCRT group). Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were balanced among the treatment groups except that the rate of lymph node involvement was lowest in the RT group (18.3%). In the intention-to-treat population, SCRT was associated with a higher rate of DFS than RT (3-year rate, 90.0% vs 82.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35-0.76) and CCRT (90.0% vs 85.0%; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.96). Treatment with SCRT also decreased cancer death risk compared with RT (5-year rate, 92.0% vs 88.0%; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.95) after adjustment for lymph node involvement. However, neither DFS nor cancer death risk was different among patients treated with CCRT or RT.Conclusions and relevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, conducted in a postoperative adjuvant treatment setting, SCRT, rather than CCRT, resulted in a higher DFS and lower risk of cancer death than RT among women with early-stage cervical cancer.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00806117.

Dataset Information

Long-course chemoradiation plus concurrent/sequential PD-1 blockade as neoadjuvant treatment for MMR-status-unscreened locally advanced rectal cancer: protocol of a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial (the POLAR-STAR trial).

Introduction

Methods and analysis

Ethics and dissemination

Trial registration number

Publications

Long-course chemoradiation plus concurrent/sequential PD-1 blockade as neoadjuvant treatment for MMR-status-unscreened locally advanced rectal cancer: protocol of a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial (the POLAR-STAR trial).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets