Dataset Information

Retrospective study to estimate the prevalence and describe the clinicopathological characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes of HER2-low breast cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Approximately 80% of all breast cancers (BCs) are currently categorized as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative [immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0, 1+, or 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH) negative]; approximately 60% of BCs traditionally categorized as HER2-negative express low levels of HER2. HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) status became clinically actionable with approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan to treat unresectable/metastatic HER2-low BC. Greater understanding of patients with HER2-low disease is urgently needed.

Patients and methods

This global, multicenter, retrospective study (NCT04807595) included tissue samples from patients with confirmed HER2-negative unresectable/metastatic BC [any hormone receptor (HR) status] diagnosed from 2014 to 2017. Pathologists rescored HER2 IHC-stained slides as HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) or HER2 IHC 0 after training on low-end expression scoring using Ventana 4B5 and other assays at local laboratories (13 sites; 10 countries) blinded to historical scores. HER2-low prevalence and concordance between historical scores and rescores were assessed. Demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were examined.

Results

In rescored samples from 789 patients with HER2-negative unresectable/metastatic BC, the overall HER2-low prevalence was 67.2% (HR positive, 71.1%; HR negative, 52.8%). Concordance was moderate between historical and rescored HER2 statuses (81.3%; κ = 0.583); positive agreement was numerically higher for HER2-low (87.5%) than HER2 IHC 0 (69.9%). More than 30% of historical IHC 0 cases were rescored as HER2-low overall (all assays) and using Ventana 4B5. There were no notable differences between HER2-low and HER2 IHC 0 in patient characteristics, treatments received, or clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Approximately two-thirds of patients with historically HER2-negative unresectable/metastatic BC may benefit from HER2-low-directed treatments. Our data suggest that HER2 reassessment in patients with historical IHC 0 scores may be considered to help optimize selection of patients for treatment. Further, accurate identification of patients with HER2-low BC may be achieved with standardized pathologist training.

SUBMITTER: Viale G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10515285 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Retrospective study to estimate the prevalence and describe the clinicopathological characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes of HER2-low breast cancer.

Viale G G Basik M M Niikura N N Tokunaga E E Brucker S S Penault-Llorca F F Hayashi N N Sohn J J Teixeira de Sousa R R Brufsky A M AM O'Brien C S CS Schmitt F F Higgins G G Varghese D D James G D GD Moh A A Livingston A A de Giorgio-Miller V V

ESMO open 20230808 4

<h4>Background</h4>Approximately 80% of all breast cancers (BCs) are currently categorized as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative [immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0, 1+, or 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH) negative]; approximately 60% of BCs traditionally categorized as HER2-negative express low levels of HER2. HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) status became clinically actionable with approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan to treat unresectable/metastatic HER2-low BC. Greater understand ...[more]

PMID: 37562195

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThis study aims to analyze potential differences in clinicopathology, efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and clinical outcome among HER2-null, HER2-ultralow and HER2-low breast cancers.MethodsConsecutive cases of HER2-negative breast cancer that received NAT were included. They were classified as HER2-null (no staining), HER2-ultralow (incomplete faint staining in ≤ 10% of tumour cells) and HER2-low (HER2-1 + or HER2-2+, in situ hybridisation negative). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the HER2 expression level.ResultsOut of 302 patients, 215 (71.19%) were HER2-low, 59 (19.54%) were HER2-ultralow, and 28 (9.27%) were HER2-null. In comparison to the HER2-ultralow group, the HER2-low group exhibited higher expression frequencies of ER (p < 0.001), PR (p < 0.001), and AR (p = 0.004), along with a greater prevalence of the luminal subtype (p < 0.001). The HER2-ultralow group also demonstrated a higher prevalence of lymph node metastasis compared to the HER2-null group (p = 0.026). Varied rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) were observed among the three subgroups: HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low, with rates of 35.71%, 22.03%, and 12.56%, respectively. Only the HER2-low subgroup exhibited a significant difference compared to HER2-null (p = 0.001). Despite variations in pCR rates, the three subgroups exhibited comparable disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.571). Importantly, we found HER2-low patients with better treatment response (RCB-0/I) exhibited significantly better DFS than those with significant residual disease (RCB-II/III) (P = 0.036). The overall rate of HER2 immunohistochemical score discordance was 45.24%, mostly driven by the conversion between HER2-0 and HER2-low phenotype. Notably, 32.19% of cases initially classified as HER2-0 phenotype on baseline biopsy were later reclassified as HER2-low after neoadjuvant therapy, and it is noteworthy that 22 out of these cases (78.57%) originally had an HER2-ultralow status in the pretreatment biopsy sample.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate the distinct clinicopathological features of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast tumors and confirm that RCB is an effective predictor of prognosis in HER2-low populations for the first time. Notably, our findings demonstrate high instability in both HER2-low and HER2-ultralow expression from the primary baseline biopsy to residual disease after NAT. Furthermore, this study is the first to investigate the clinicopathological feature and the effectiveness of NAT for HER2-ultralow breast cancer.

Project description:BackgroundHuman epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer, which is defined as HER2 1+ or 2+ in immunohistochemistry without gene amplification, accounts for a considerable part of all breast cancers. However, it remains controversial whether HER2-low breast cancer is a distinct entity. Our aim was to compare the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between HER2-zero and HER2-low early breast cancer.MethodsThe study was a retrospective analysis that enrolled 1,039 patients with available HER2 expression data in a single institute from 2013 to 2014, of whom 262 HER2-positive patients were excluded from the subsequent analysis. The remaining patients were divided into HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. Each group was further categorized into a hormone receptor (HR)-positive and an HR-negative subgroup. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected and compared between HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), which were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test, landmark analysis, and Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsA total of 777 non-HER2-positive patients were included in this analysis, of whom 126, 552, 53, and 46 patients were HR-positive/HER2-zero, HR-positive/HER2-low, HR-negative/HER2-zero, and HR-negative/HER2-low, respectively. No significant difference in DFS and OS was detected between the HER2-zero group and the HER2-low group when paired by HR status. Landmark analysis with a time point set at 5 years indicated that HR-positive/HER2-low patients had a better DFS compared with HR-positive/HER2-zero patients after 5 years (p = 0.0047). HER2-low status was an independent prognostic factor for DFS after 5 years [hazard ratio (HR) 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.75, p = 0.01].ConclusionThe clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer were similar regardless of HR status. Patients with HR-positive/HER2-low tumors tended to have a better DFS than their HR-positive/HER2-zero counterparts after 5 years.

Project description:ObjectiveDespite the promising efficacy of the novel antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan in treating Hormone Receptor (HoR)-positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC), its categorization as a distinct entity remains disputed, as does the divergence in its endocrine and chemotherapy outcomes. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics, primary/metastatic lesion HER2 expression, and treatment outcomes of HoR-positive/HER2-low patients.MethodsWe included HoR-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients who underwent 1st and 2nd line endocrine treatment from July 2010 to October 2022 at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, comparing the clinical pathological characteristics, HER2 expression in primary/metastatic lesions, treatment, and therapeutic effects of the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups.ResultsAmong the 458 HoR-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients, 54.37% (249/458) were HER2-low. The HER2-low group and the HER2-zero group had similar clinical pathological characteristics and similar progression-free survival (PFS) of 1st and 2nd line endocrine treatment (median PFS: 8.05 months vs 10.12 months, p=0.114, HR 1.257, 95% CI 0.771 to 1.028). The PFS of the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups was also similar, treated with different endocrine drugs (including aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen/toremifene, fulvestrant, palbociclib, and everolimus). However, the HER2-low group had significantly shorter PFS during 1st and 2nd line chemotherapy compared to the HER2-zero group (median PFS: 8.64 vs 9.03 months, p=0.027, HR 0.841, 95% CI 0.721-0.980). Additionally, 41.18% (63/153) of patients exhibited a change in HER2 expression between primary and metastatic lesions. Notably, patients whose HER2 status changed from zero to low expression had significantly prolonged PFS during chemotherapy compared to those who maintained low HER2 expression (median PFS: 14.29 vs 11.27 months, p=0.048, HR 0.597, 95% CI 0.358-0.996).ConclusionIn HoR-positive MBC, patients with low and zero HER2 expression have similar clinical characteristics and respond similarly to endocrine treatment, but the chemotherapy effect is worse in the HER2-low patients. Moreover, the transformation of HER2 status from primary to metastatic lesions may have potential influence on chemotherapy outcomes. Therefore, the expression and heterogeneity of HER2 should be considered in clinical decisions.

Project description:BackgroundDifferent hormone receptor (HR) expression patterns have significant biological and therapeutic implications in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, the distinction between HR-positive /HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) and HR-negative/HER2-positive (HR-/HER2+) subtypes remains unclear.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed 828 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from 2012 to 2022. Baseline characteristics were compared by chi-square test. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsIn total, 56.3% (n = 466) had HR-positive and 43.7% (n = 362) had HR-negative disease. Comparatively, HR+/HER2 + breast cancers presented favorable clinicopathological features. At a median follow-up of 49 months, 199 disease-free survival (DFS) events and 99 deaths were observed. HR+/HER2 + patients had significantly better survival outcomes than HR-/HER2 + patients. HR-positive status was an independent protective factor for overall survival (OS) [P = 0.032; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.96] and DFS (P = 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46-0.81). HR+/HER2 + patients were significantly less sensitive to neoadjuvant therapy than HR-/HER2 + patients. In the first-line treatment for HR+/HER2 + advanced breast cancer, receiving endocrine therapy significantly improved advanced-OS (P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.59) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.58) compared with not receiving endocrine therapy. Moreover, maintenance endocrine therapy after HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy is associated with significant advanced-OS and PFS benefits compared with no maintenance endocrine therapy (advanced-OS: P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.03-0.12; PFS: P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.57).ConclusionsThis study reveals the high heterogeneity of HER2-positive breast cancer related to HR status in clinicopathological features, metastasis patterns, and outcomes. Large randomized controlled trials are warranted to optimize treatment strategies for the HER2-positive breast cancer population.

Project description:PurposeTo investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of early-stage breast cancer (EBC) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low expression.MethodsThe clinicopathological data and follow-up information of EBC patients with HER2-low and HER2-0 expression treated at the Breast Disease Center of Peking University First Hospital from January 2014 to December 2017 were analyzed. The prognosis between HER2-low and HER2-0 expression groups and with different hormone receptor (HR) expression were compared by statistics. Meanwhile, the expression of Ki67, androgen receptor (AR), TOPIIa, P53, PTEN, and CK5/6 were also analyzed with the HER2-low expression and prognosis.ResultsRetrospectively analyzed 1253 cases of EBC, including 583 (46.5%) cases of HER2-low breast cancer (BC) and 366 (29.2%) HER2-0 BC cases. Among the HER2-low BC patients, 487 (83.5%) were HR-positive, while 96 (16.5%) were HR-negative. Among the HER2-0 BC patients, 265 (72.4%) were HR-positive, while 101 (27.6%) were HR-negative. Median follow-up time was 53 months. The 5-year disease-free survival of HER2-low BC patients was 90.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.2-93.1), and the 5-year overall survival was 95.4% (95% CI: 93.3-97.6). Cox regression analysis showed that T stage, lymphovascular invasion, and/or perineural invasion were prognostic factors of HER2-low BC patients. However, the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival of patients in the HER2-low and HER2-0 groups were not significantly different in all patients, but a tendency of better prognosis in HER2-low group was seen in HR-negative tumors.ConclusionHER2-low EBC patients accounted for 46.5% of the patient population. T stage, lymphovascular invasion, and/or perineural invasion were factors affecting the prognosis of BC patients with low HER2 expression. No significant difference in prognosis was noted between HER2-low and HER2-0 EBC patients. But in HR-negative tumors, a tendency of better prognosis was seen in HER2-low versus HER2-0.

Dataset Information

Retrospective study to estimate the prevalence and describe the clinicopathological characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes of HER2-low breast cancer.

Background

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Retrospective study to estimate the prevalence and describe the clinicopathological characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes of HER2-low breast cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets