Dataset Information

Can virtual non-contrast imaging replace true non-contrast imaging in multiphase scanning of the neck region?

ABSTRACT:

Background

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is an advanced imaging method that enables reconstruction of virtual non-contrast (VNC) images from a contrast-enhanced acquisition. This has the potential to reduce radiation exposure by eliminating the need for a true non-contrast (TNC) phase.

Purpose

The purpose is to evaluate the feasibility of VNC images in the neck region.

Materials and methods

A total of 100 patients underwent a DECT scan as part of diagnostic workup of primary hyperparathyroidism. VNC images were reconstructed from 30 s (arterial) and 50 s (venous) post-contrast scans. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in thyroid tissue, lymph node, carotid artery, jugular vein, fat, and sternocleidomastoid muscle. Mean densities of all anatomical structures were compared between VNC and TNC images.

Results

For all anatomical structures except the thyroid gland, the difference in mean density between TNC and VNC images was less than 15 HU. The mean difference in density between TNC and VNC images of the thyroid was 53.2 HU (95% CI 46.8; 59.6, p = <0.001).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated an acceptable agreement in density between true non-contrast and virtual non-contrast images for most anatomical structures in the neck region. Therefore, VNC images may have the potential to replace TNC images in the neck. However, due to significant differences in CT density of thyroid tissue, true non-contrast imaging cannot be directly substituted by virtual non-contrast imaging when examining the thyroid and its surrounding tissue.

SUBMITTER: Al-Difaie Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10521284 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Can virtual non-contrast imaging replace true non-contrast imaging in multiphase scanning of the neck region?

Al-Difaie Zaid Z Scheepers Max Hmc MH Bouvy Nicole D ND Engelen Sanne S Havekes Bas B Postma Alida A AA

Acta radiologica open 20230801 8

<h4>Background</h4>Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is an advanced imaging method that enables reconstruction of virtual non-contrast (VNC) images from a contrast-enhanced acquisition. This has the potential to reduce radiation exposure by eliminating the need for a true non-contrast (TNC) phase.<h4>Purpose</h4>The purpose is to evaluate the feasibility of VNC images in the neck region.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A total of 100 patients underwent a DECT scan as part of diagnostic workup ...[more]

PMID: 37767056

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionIn veterinary medicine, abdominal computer tomographic (CT) examinations regularly require a minimum of two scans, with a native scan (true unenhanced, TUE) as a reference for the subsequent contrast-enhanced CT scan (CECT). Spectral detector CT (SDCT) offers the possibility to calculate virtual non-contrast (VNC) images from the post-contrast scan, but this has not yet been investigated in veterinary medicine. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of VNC images for abdominal organs in 44 dogs without abdominal pathologies by evaluating their quantitative and qualitative parameters compared to TUE images. We hypothesized that the subtraction of iodine is sufficient in the VNC series compared to the TUE series and that the image quality of the SDCT series is superior to conventional CT images.MethodsCorresponding attenuation values in the VNC and TUE series regarding the regions of interest (ROI) in different parenchymal organs and major vessels of the abdominal cavity were assessed by means of a two one-sided t-test (TOST) and Bland-Altman plots. Additionally, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated for each ROI in the different series. In the second step, two board-certified veterinary radiologists made a qualitative assessment of VNC images vs. TUE images in consensus by rating the iodine subtraction, image noise, and image quality of VNC images based on a specific 5-point Likert scale.ResultsThe difference in corresponding Hounsfield units (HUs) between TUE and VNC images was less than 10 HU in 78.67% of all ROIs. Regarding the limit of less than 10 HU, in the performed TOST, significant p-values of < 0.05 were reached for the liver, spleen, pancreas, and musculature, implying equivalence of both modalities. The quality of spectral base image (SBI) data was rated equivalent to calculated conventional images in the subjective assessment by reaching an average Likert scale score of 3.2 points.DiscussionVNC images calculated from SDCT data prove a valid alternative to conventional TUE images in the abdominal organs of canine patients without abdominal pathology. VNC offers the possibility to reduce time under general anesthesia and minimize radiation exposure. Future studies are needed to prove the application of this method in clinically diseased patients.

Project description:Objectives: Virtual non-contrast (VNC) series reconstructed from contrast-enhanced cardiac scans acquired with photon counting detector CT (PCD-CT) systems have the potential to replace true non-contrast (TNC) series. However, a quantitative comparison of the image characteristics of TNC and VNC data is necessary to determine to what extent they are interchangeable. This work quantitatively evaluates the image similarity between VNC and TNC reconstructions by measuring the stability of multi-class radiomics features extracted in intra-patient TNC and VNC reconstructions. Methods: TNC and VNC series of 84 patients were retrospectively collected. For each patient, the myocardium and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) were semi-automatically segmented in both VNC and TNC reconstructions, and 105 radiomics features were extracted in each mask. Intra-feature correlation scores were computed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Stable features were defined with an ICC higher than 0.75. Results: In the myocardium, 41 stable features were identified, and the three with the highest ICC were glrlm_GrayLevelVariance with ICC3 of 0.98 [0.97, 0.99], ngtdm_Strength with ICC3 of 0.97 [0.95, 0.98], firstorder_Variance with ICC3 of 0.96 [0.94, 0.98]. For the epicardial fat, 40 stable features were found, and the three highest ranked are firstorder_Median with ICC3 of 0.96 [0.93, 0.97], firstorder_RootMeanSquared with ICC3 of 0.95 [0.92, 0.97], firstorder_Mean with ICC3 of 0.95 [0.92, 0.97]. A total of 24 features (22.8%; 24/105) showed stability in both anatomical structures. Conclusions: The significant differences in the correlation of radiomics features in VNC and TNC volumes of the myocardium and epicardial fat suggested that the two reconstructions may differ more than initially assumed. This indicates that they may not be interchangeable, and such differences could have clinical implications. Therefore, care should be given when selecting VNC as a substitute for TNC in radiomics research to ensure accurate and reliable analysis. Moreover, the observed variations may impact clinical workflows, where precise tissue characterization is critical for diagnosis and treatment planning.

Project description:BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is commonly assessed by computed tomography (CT), but the associated radiation exposure is a major concern. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively compare the image quality of virtual non-contrast (VNC) images reconstructed from arterial and portal venous phases with that of true non-contrast (TNC) images in patients with CRC to assess the potential of TNC images to replace VNC images, thereby reducing the radiation dose.MethodsA total of 69 patients with postoperative pathologically confirmed CRC at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between May 2022 and April 2023 were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The CT protocol included the acquisition of TNC images, arterial and portal venous phase images; the VNC images were reconstructed from the two postcontrast phase images. Several parameters, including the CT attenuation value, absolute attenuation error, imaging noise [standard deviation (SD)], signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), were measured in multiple abdominal structures for both the TNC and VNC images. Two blinded readers assessed the subjective image quality using a five-point scale. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the objective and subjective results between the TNC and VNC images. Individual measurements of radiation doses for the TNC scan and contrast scan protocols were recorded.ResultsA total of 2,070 regions of interest (ROIs) of the 69 patients were analyzed. Overall, the VNC images exhibited significantly lower attenuation values and SD values than the TNC images in all tissues, except for the abdominal aorta, portal vein, and spleen. The mean absolute attenuation errors between the VNC and TNC images were all less than 10 Hounsfield units (HU). The percentages of absolute attenuation errors less than 5 and 10 HU in the VNC images from the arterial phase (VNCa) were 78.99% and 97.97%, respectively, while those from the portal venous phase (VNCp) were 81.59% and 96.96%, respectively. The absolute attenuation errors between the TNC and VNCa images were smaller than those between the TNC and VNCp images for tumors [VNCaerror: 2.77, interquartile range (IQR) 1.77-4.22; VNCperror: 3.27, IQR 2.68-4.30; P=0.002]. The SNR values and CNR values in the VNC images were significantly higher than those in the TNC images for all tissues, except for the portal vein and spleen. The image quality was rated as excellent (represented by a score of 5) in the majority of the TNC and VNC images; however, the VNC images scored lower than the TNC images. Eliminating the TNC phase resulted in a reduction of approximately 37.99% in the effective dose (ED).ConclusionsThe VNC images provided accurate CT attenuation, good image quality, and lower radiation doses than the TNC images in CRC, and the VNCa images showed minimal differences in the CT attenuation of the tumors.

Dataset Information

Can virtual non-contrast imaging replace true non-contrast imaging in multiphase scanning of the neck region?

Background

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Can virtual non-contrast imaging replace true non-contrast imaging in multiphase scanning of the neck region?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets