Dataset Information

Tocilizumab in combination with a standard induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukaemia patients (TOCILAM study): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 1 trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), interleukin-6 (IL-6) promotes chemo-resistance and its levels correlate with poor prognosis. IL-6 blockade may represent a promising therapeutic strategy. We aimed to test, tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 receptor (R) monoclonal antibody in combination with standard intensive AML induction chemotherapy.

Methods

This investigator-initiated single-centre phase 1 trial was conducted at Nantes University Hospital in France. According to a continual reassessment method, three escalating doses were tested of intravenous (IV) tocilizumab (4, 6, and 8 mg/kg) administered at day (d) 8 of a standard AML induction chemotherapy (IV idarubicine 8 mg/m² d1 to d5 + IV cytarabine 100 mg/m² d1 to d7). All adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and with a newly diagnosed (excluding patients with a favourable risk according to ELN-2017 classification if <60 year-old) or a relapsed/refractory AML were eligible. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of tocilizumab to administrate with a standard intensive AML induction. Safety outcomes were continuously monitored for at each participant contact. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04547062.

Findings

Between Dec 29, 2020 and Dec 1, 2022, 12 patients were enrolled, of whom 75% had an ELN-2017 high-risk profile, and were treated with tocilizumab- two patients at 4 mg/kg, two at 6 mg/kg and eight at 8 mg/kg of tocilizumab. No dose-limiting toxicity related to tocilizumab was documented. There were nine serious adverse events, none of which were related to tocilizumab, and there was no treatment-related deaths. MTD was thus not reached. Two deaths occurred during induction. In the remaining ten evaluable patients, nine responded to treatment.

Interpretation

The combination of tocilizumab with standard AML intensive induction appears to be safe and resulting responses are encouraging. A dose of 8 mg/kg of tocilizumab given at day 8 of induction could be used for further phase 2/3 studies.

Funding

The Leucémie Espoir Atlantique Famille (LEAF)-"Tous avec Fabien" association.

SUBMITTER: Peterlin P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10542006 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Tocilizumab in combination with a standard induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukaemia patients (TOCILAM study): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 1 trial.

Peterlin Pierre P Garnier Alice A Le Bourgeois Amandine A Guillaume Thierry T Le Bris Yannick Y Theisen Olivier O Béné Marie C MC Eveillard Marion M Rimbert Marie M Jullien Maxime M Planche Lucie L Gaschet Joelle J Chevallier Patrice P

EClinicalMedicine 20230928

<h4>Background</h4>In acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), interleukin-6 (IL-6) promotes chemo-resistance and its levels correlate with poor prognosis. IL-6 blockade may represent a promising therapeutic strategy. We aimed to test, tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 receptor (R) monoclonal antibody in combination with standard intensive AML induction chemotherapy.<h4>Methods</h4>This investigator-initiated single-centre phase 1 trial was conducted at Nantes University Hospital in France. According to a continu ...[more]

PMID: 37786451

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAddition of the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax to lower intensity therapy has been shown to improve overall survival in older (aged 75 years or older) and unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia. The aim of this study was to investigate the activity of venetoclax combined with intensive chemotherapy in patients aged 65 years or younger with acute myeloid leukaemia.MethodsThis cohort study was done at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in the USA, as part of the single-centre, single arm, phase 2, CLIA trial. Here we report on the independent cohort investigating the safety and activity of venetoclax added to intensive chemotherapy (the CLIA regimen [cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, idarubicin]). Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with a new diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia, mixed phenotype acute leukaemia, or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (≥10% blasts or International Prognostic Scoring System ≥2 [intermediate]), who received no previous potentially curative therapy for leukaemia. Patients received cladribine (5 mg/m2) and cytarabine (1·5 g/m2 for patients aged <60 years, 1 g/m2 for patients aged ≥60 years) intravenously on days 1-5 and idarubicin (10 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1-3. Consolidation was cladribine (5 mg/m2) and cytarabine (1 g/m2 for patients aged <60 years and 0·75 g/m2 for patients aged ≥60 years) on days 1-3 and idarubicin (8 mg/m2) on days 1-2. Venetoclax (400 mg) was given on days 2-8 with each course. Patients with a known FLT3-ITD or FLT3-TKD mutation received midostaurin or gilteritinib. The primary outcome was composite complete response (complete response plus complete response with incomplete blood count recovery). Secondary outcomes were overall response, duration of response, event-free survival, overall survival, and safety. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02115295.FindingsBetween Feb 25, 2019, and March 23, 2021, 77 patients were assessed for eligibility, 50 of whom were enrolled. Median age was 48 years (IQR 37-56). 47 (94% [95% CI 83-98]) patients had composite complete response, with the same proportion also having an overall response; two (4% [1-14]) patients did not respond, and one (2% [0-11]) patient died during induction. 37 (82% [95% CI 68-92]) of 45 patients had undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD). At a median follow-up of 13·5 months (IQR 6·4-19·5), the median duration of response, event-free survival, and overall survival were not reached. At 12 months, the estimated duration of response was 74% (95% CI 60-92), event-free survival was 68% (54-85), and overall survival was 85% (75-97). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or worse were febrile neutropenia (42 [84%] patients), infection (six [12%]), and alanine aminotransferase elevations (six [12%]). There was one death during induction in a patient treated with CLIA-venetoclax plus a FLT3 inhibitor. Two patients died of infectious complications while in complete response in consolidation cycles, both of whom had FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia and were receiving combined therapy with a FLT3 inhibitor. No deaths were deemed to be treatment related.InterpretationVenetoclax added to CLIA was safe and active in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, producing high rates of durable MRD-negative remissions and encouraging event-free survival and overall survival.FundingMD Anderson Cancer Center.

Project description:BackgroundThe median overall survival of patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes refractory to hypomethylating agents is less than 6 months. Currently, no standard therapy for such patients exists. Preclinical studies have shown that inhibition of the nuclear export protein exportin 1 (XPO1) causes nuclear accumulation of p53 and disruption of NF-κB signalling, both relevant targets for myelodysplastic syndromes. We therefore aimed to assess the safety and activity of selinexor in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or oligoblastic acute myeloid leukaemia refractory to hypomethylating agents.MethodsWe did a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the USA. We included patients 18 years or older with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes or oligoblastic acute myeloid leukaemia (defined as blasts ≥20% but ≤30%) refractory to hypomethylating agents and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2. Eligible patients received 3-week long cycles of oral selinexor (60 mg twice per week for 2 weeks, followed by 1 week off). The primary outcome was overall response rate. Complete remission, partial remission, marrow complete remission, or haematological improvement were included in the response categories for assessing the primary endpoint. The activity analysis included all patients who completed at least one full-scheduled post-treatment disease assessment. All patients who were given selinexor were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02228525.FindingsBetween Sept 23, 2014, and March 13, 2018, 25 patients were enrolled on this study. The median follow-up was 8·5 months (IQR 3·1-12·2). Two patients did not meet the full eligibility criteria after baseline assessment; therefore, 23 patients were evaluable for activity assessment. In the 23 evaluable patients, overall response rate was 26% (95% CI 10-48) in six patients with marrow complete remission, with an additional 12 patients (52%, 95% CI 31-73) achieving stable disease. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (eight [32%] of 25 patients) and hyponatraemia (five [20%]). There were no drug-related serious adverse events and no treatment-related deaths.InterpretationSelinexor showed responses in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or oligoblastic acute myeloid leukaemia refractory to hypomethylating agents. Adverse events were manageable with supportive care implementation. Further studies are needed to compare selinexor with supportive care alone, and to identify patient subgroups that might benefit the most from selinexor treatment.FundingKaryopharm Therapeutics.

Project description:BackgroundInotuzumab ozogamicin, an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody bound to a toxin, calicheamicin, has shown single-agent activity in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. We aimed to assess the activity and safety of inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy in older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.MethodsWe did a single-arm, phase 2 study at the MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Eligible patients were aged 60 years or older and had newly diagnosed, Philadelphia chromosome-negative, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3 or lower. The induction chemotherapy regimen used was mini-hyper-CVD (a lower intensity version of the conventional hyper-CVAD). Odd-numbered cycles (1,3, 5, and 7) comprised intravenous cyclophosphamide (150 mg/m2 every 12 h on days 1-3) and oral or intravenous dexamethasone (20 mg per day on days 1-4 and days 11-14); no anthracycline was administered. Intravenous vincristine (2 mg flat dose) was given on days 1 and 8. Even-numbered cycles comprised intravenous methotrexate (250 mg/m2 on day 1) and intravenous cytarabine (0·5 g/m2 given every 12 h on days 2 and 3). Intravenous inotuzumab ozogamicin was given on day 3 of the first four cycles at the dose of 1·3-1·8 mg/m2 at cycle 1, followed by 1·0 -1·3 mg/m2 in subsequent cycles. Maintenance therapy with dose-reduced POMP (purinethol [6-mercaptopurine], oncovin [vincristine sulfate], methotrexate, and prednisone) was given for 3 years. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival at 2 years. Analyses were by intention to treat. The study is ongoing, recruiting patients for an approved expansion phase with a modified treatment plan by protocol amendment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01371630.FindingsBetween Nov 12, 2011, and April 22, 2017, 52 patients with a median age of 68 years (IQR 64-72) were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 13-48), 2-year progression-free survival was 59% (95% CI 43-72). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were prolonged thrombocytopenia (42 [81%] patients), infections during induction (27 [52%]) and consolidation chemotherapy (36 [69%]), hyperglycaemia (28 [54%]), hypokalaemia (16 [31%]), increased aminotransferases (ten [19%]), hyperbilirubinaemia (nine [17%]), and haemorrhage (seven [15%]). Veno-occlusive disease occurred in four (8%) patients. Six (12%) patients died from adverse events that were deemed treatment related (five [10%] from sepsis and one [2%] from veno-occlusive disease).InterpretationInotuzumab ozogamicin plus mini-hyper-CVD chemotherapy is a safe and active first-line therapy option in older patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and could represent a new therapy for this population. Randomised, phase 3 trials to evaluate the efficacy of this combination compared with the current standard of care in this setting, combination chemotherapy without inotuzumab ozogamicin, are warranted.FundingMD Anderson Cancer Center.

Dataset Information

Tocilizumab in combination with a standard induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukaemia patients (TOCILAM study): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 1 trial.

Background

Methods

Findings

Interpretation

Funding

Publications

Tocilizumab in combination with a standard induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukaemia patients (TOCILAM study): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 1 trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets