Development of a New Resident-Centric Sex Trafficking Education Program for Obstetrics/Gynecology, Emergency Medicine, and Family Medicine Programs
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Briggs M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10546594 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:IntroductionMillions of patients present to US emergency departments every year with OB/GYN concerns. Emergency medicine trainees must be adequately prepared to care for this population, regardless of how commonly they appear in the training environment. We used active learning and gamification principles in this curriculum to increase learner engagement and participation in the material.MethodsWe chose OB/GYN topics based on review of Tintinalli's OB/GYN content and the American Board of Emergency Medicine's Model of Clinical Practice. Each session comprised a case-based lecture and review questions using the game-based Kahoot! online software. Pre- and postcurriculum surveys assessed residents' confidence in caring for emergent OB/GYN pathologies on a 5-point Likert scale. We designed survey questions assessing the first level of Kirkpatrick's levels of training evaluation; these questions were reviewed and revised by the department's Medical Education Scholarship Committee for validity.ResultsA mean of 18 residents attended each session. Seventy-six percent of residents (26 of 34) completed the precurriculum survey, 67% (23 of 34) completed the postcurriculum survey, and 44% (15 of 34) completed both. For all respondents, mean reported confidence with curriculum topics increased from 3.5 to 4.0 (p < .05). For residents completing both surveys, confidence increased from 3.4 to 4.0 (p < .01).DiscussionApplication of this curriculum significantly improved learner confidence in targeted OB/GYN topics. Future directions could include evaluating curricular impact at higher levels in the Kirkpatrick model, extending sessions to include more time for interaction, and adding suggested readings.
| S-EPMC10415535 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRecent changes in anatomy curricula in undergraduate medical education (UME), including pedagogical changes and reduced time, pose challenges for foundational learning. Consequently, it is important to ask clinicians what anatomical content is important for their clinical specialty, which when taken collectively, can inform curricular development.MethodsThis study surveyed 55 non-primary care residents in anesthesiology (AN; N = 6), emergency medicine (EM; N = 15), obstetrics and gynecology (OB; N = 13), and orthopedics (OR; N = 21) to assess the importance of 907 anatomical structures across all anatomical regions. Survey ratings by participants were converted into a post-hoc classification system to provide end-users of this data with an intuitive and useful classification system for categorizing individual anatomical structures (i.e., essential, more important, less important, not important).ResultsSignificant variability was observed in the classifications of essential anatomy: 29.1% of all structures were considered essential by OB residents, 37.6% for AN residents, 41.6% for EM residents, and 72.0% for OR residents. Significant differences (with large effect sizes) were also observed between residency groups: OR residents rated anatomy of the back, limbs, and pelvis and perineum anatomy common to both sexes significantly higher, whereas OB residents rated the pelvis and perineum anatomy common to both sexes and anatomy for individuals assigned female at birth highest. Agreement in classifications of importance among residents was observed for selected anatomical structures in the thorax, abdomen, pelvis and perineum (assigned male at birth-specific anatomy), and head and neck. As with the ratings of anatomical structures, OR residents had the highest classification across all nine tissue types (p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe present study created a database of anatomical structures assessed from a clinical perspective that may be considered when determining foundational anatomy for UME curriculum, as well as for graduate medical education.
| S-EPMC11515711 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INTRODUCTION: Obstetrics and gynecology residents benefit from providing care to diverse patient populations and increasing their awareness of the social determinants of health. OBJECTIVES: To describe and evaluate an outpatient rotation for obstetrics and gynecology residents at a county jail. METHODS: A comprehensive curriculum incorporating Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competencies was designed for all first-year residents to rotate weekly at the local county jail during their 6-week ambulatory care block. Residents completed an anonymous online evaluation and wrote a reflective essay at the end of the rotation. Data for patient visits were tabulated. RESULTS: All 9 first-year residents completed the rotation and the evaluation. Seventy-eight percent of patient visits were for gynecologic services, predominantly family planning. Residents reported that the rotation overall was a positive experience, emphasizing the unique intersection between psychosocial issues and health care in the jail setting. Rotation objectives that satisfied the 6 ACGME competencies were met. DISCUSSION: Providing care to incarcerated women through a structured curriculum is a novel way to encourage obstetrics and gynecology residents to consider the social determinants of health and for residents to cultivate their counseling skills. The rotation also included a wide breadth and depth of clinical diagnoses and procedures. Obstetrics and gynecology residency programs should consider a curriculum in reproductive health for incarcerated women.
| S-EPMC3444189 | biostudies-other
Project description:IntroductionOperating room experience alone is insufficient for surgical training. In the current era of graduate medical education, work hour restrictions and the expectations of patients and the public limit residents' ability to participate in surgical cases. We aimed to create a laparoscopy curriculum for gynecology residents that teaches the fundamentals of laparoscopy utilizing self-learning modules complemented by skill-focused and faculty-guided laboratories to maximize learning time outside of the operating room.MethodsThe curriculum consists of five electronic modules on the basics of laparoscopy. Residents are expected to complete these on their own. In addition, quarterly simulation labs are taught by faculty and allow residents to practice, with guidance, key skills as derived from a previously published laparoscopic surgery skills curriculum. Residents are then evaluated using an objective structured assessment of technical skill comprised of the Global Rating Scale of Operative Performance and time metrics for each skill. We also evaluate resident confidence and satisfaction.ResultsIn our initial year, residents' confidence regarding laparoscopy ability and satisfaction in training did demonstrate improvement. With concentrated practice, residents' observed skills also showed advancement. Furthermore, the implementation of the curriculum was feasible with reasonable cost and limited resident and faculty time.DiscussionWhile simulation is well accepted as a modality for teaching surgery, its implementation is often limited due to concerns for time and money. Our experience illustrates that simulation is an effective teaching tool for residents without becoming a burden on a department.
| S-EPMC6464452 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTravel restrictions amidst the COVID-19 pandemic reshaped interviewing for fellowships into a predominantly virtual process. How this impacts Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) resident approaches to fellowship application and Match navigation is largely unknown.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional survey study of fourth year OB/GYN residents in the United States who participated in at least one virtual fellowship interview in 2020. We collected information regarding demographics, application strategy, perceived strengths and weaknesses of virtual interviews, and confidence with rank list creation. Descriptive statistics were used for categorical variables and responses pre- and post-Match were compared using Fisher's exact test.ResultsSeventy-five out of an estimated 490 applicants (~ 15% response rate) completed the survey. Of the respondents, 65.3% felt they interviewed at more programs virtually than they would anticipate completing in person, but perceived less confidence in having the necessary information (n = 45, 60%) or understanding the culture of programs (n = 59, 78.7%) to create a rank list. Cost savings were the main benefit of virtual interviews (n = 50, 66.7%), and inability to get a true "feel" for a program was the biggest limitation (n = 43, 57.3%). A majority (46.7%) advocate for a future hybrid interview process.ConclusionsOB/GYN residents pursuing fellowship reported interviewing at more programs during the virtual season, but had less confidence with rank list creation. Cost savings benefits are weighed against difficulty getting a "feel" for programs virtually. Most would advocate for a future hybrid interview process.
| S-EPMC8789205 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEmpathy is essential in medical practice, particularly in obstetrics and gynecology. Narrative Medicine, which involves storytelling and reflective writing, has been shown to enhance empathy among healthcare providers. Despite its benefits, there is limited research on the impact of narrative medicine on empathy among obstetrics and gynecology residents.MethodsThis study is a prospective controlled trail aimed at investigating the impact of a narrative medicine-based curriculum on the empathy levels of obstetrics and gynecology residents. The subjects of this study are obstetrics and gynecology residents undergoing standardized training at Hangzhou First People's Hospital in 2023, which was divided into two groups: one receiving narrative medicine training and the other, traditional training. The Chinese version of the Jefferson Empathy Scale was used to measure empathy levels before and after the intervention. A self-developed questionnaire was distributed to Group A residents at the end of the narrative medicine course to evaluate the curriculum.ResultsBefore the intervention, there was no significant difference in empathy scores between the two groups. However, after the narrative medicine intervention, Group A showed a significant improvement in empathy scores compared to Group B (P < 0.0001). Residents in Group A also rated the narrative medicine curriculum highly, with 92% considering it "great" or "excellent"; 87% finding it effective in improving empathy and doctor-patient communication; and 91% feeling that this course promoted their self-reflection in medical practice.ConclusionsThe integration of narrative medicine into the training of obstetrics and gynecology residents significantly enhanced their empathy levels. Most residents perceive narrative medicine as a valued and effective means of enhancing doctor-patient communication and reflection capability.
| S-EPMC11654429 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundResident attrition negatively affects residents and programs. The incidence of attrition in emergency medicine (EM) and program-specific factors associated with attrition remain unclear.ObjectiveWe quantified the percentage of EM residencies affected by attrition between 2007 and 2016 and identified program-specific factors associated with attrition.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of data derived from the American Medical Association National Graduate Medical Education Census. We defined attrition as any postgraduate who left their residency training program prior to completion. We calculated the percentage of residency programs that experienced attrition and the overall incidence of attrition. We used Fisher's exact tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and t tests, as well as multivariable logistic regression, to identify program-specific factors associated with attrition.ResultsBetween 2007 and 2016, 139 EM residency programs (82%) experienced attrition of at least 1 resident. An average of 23% of EM training programs experienced attrition annually. The incidence of EM resident attrition averaged 0.85% per year. Program-specific factors associated with attrition include 4-year residencies (P = .031), programs with medium class size (P = .0003), more female residents (P = .002), and more female faculty (P = .003). After analysis, only medium class size (compared to small) was associated with attrition (odds ratio = 4.96, 95% confidence interval 1.65-14.91).ConclusionsBetween 2007 and 2016, while the incidence of resident attrition in EM was low (< 1%), the majority of programs experienced resident attrition. Medium class size (7 to 12 residents) was the only program-specific factor associated with increased attrition.
| S-EPMC6919186 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionEmergency medicine physicians must have the knowledge and skills to stabilize all life-and-limb-threatening conditions. These skills are especially important considering that the 1989 COBRA act clearly defines active labor as a condition unsuitable to transfer. Given this context, we thought it necessary to create a work that could be used to provide emergency physicians with the necessary skills to assist in deliveries both routine and complex.MethodsThe total time requirement for the workshop is 4 hours. Before the session begins, learners are asked to fill out a survey. Learners complete two 40-minute small-group sessions on the topics of normal vaginal delivery and shoulder dystocia with hands-on training with birthing manikins. After a short break learners complete a 65-minute small-group session for breech delivery with hands-on training. Each small-group session is preceded by a whole-group demonstration of required skills lasting 15 minutes as well a mini lecture on maternal hemorrhage and estimation of blood loss.ResultsOur workshop has been shown to successfully educate emergency physicians with a range of obstetric experience and improve their knowledge base and hands-on skills. One hundred percent of our learners felt this workshop was appropriate for them and met its stated goals.DiscussionWhile this is not the first workshop to educate on obstetric deliveries and their possible complications, it is the first to be created with the emergency medicine provider as the intended audience and the first to create a curriculum around uncomplicated delivery, shoulder dystocia, breech delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage.
| S-EPMC6440410 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INTRODUCTION: Residency programs seek to match the best candidates with their positions. To avoid ethical conflicts in this process, the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP or Match) has rules regarding appropriate conduct, including guidelines on contact between candidates and programs. Our study examined communication between obstetrics and gynecology (Ob-Gyn) programs and residency candidates after interviewing and prior to ranking. METHODS: Ob-Gyn program directors in the United States were sent a self-administered survey via e-mail. Data were collected and analyzed using descriptive methods to examine communication practices of these programs. RESULTS: The response rate was 40%. The findings showed that respondents had variable interpretations of the NRMP rules and suggest that programs may be communicating their match intentions especially to favored candidates. Respondents' open text comments highlighted program directors' frustrations with current NRMP rules. DISCUSSION: NRMP communication rules are intended to minimize pressure on residency candidates. Our findings suggest they may be leading to unforeseen stresses on program directors and candidates. CONCLUSIONS: As educational leaders in medicine, we must consider what professional communications are acceptable without increasing the pressure on candidates during the ranking and match process.
| S-EPMC3399607 | biostudies-other
Project description:PurposeTo assess the current state of training among U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/Gyn) residents in the field of transgender medicine.MethodsAn anonymous survey was sent to current OB/Gyn residents in the United States, which contained a series of questions regarding their training experiences caring for transgender patients.ResultsRoughly half of respondents (49.4%) reported having formal didactics in transgender medicine or personal experience caring for a transgender patient (46.8%). Only 14.5% of respondents had any surgical training, and 59% responded that they had at least some comfort level caring for transgender patients. Of the areas of care assessed, residents felt most comfortable providing appropriate cancer screening to transgender patients and least comfortable with gender-affirming hormone therapy management. Just 50.3% of respondents felt that they worked with at least one faculty member with expertise in transgender medicine, and more than half (51.1%) responded that they felt there were barriers to training in their program, with 14% reporting a perceived atmosphere of bias or discrimination toward this patient population. The majority of residents (82.6%) expressed interest in additional training in this field, with direct patient exposure and didactic lectures identified as being the most desired learning modalities.ConclusionApproximately half of resident respondents reported didactic exposure to transgender medicine in their current programs, with far fewer having surgical training. At least half of respondents felt that there were barriers to their training in transgender medicine, and a majority of respondents were interested in further training in this field.
| S-EPMC9831242 | biostudies-literature