Dataset Information

Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs.

ABSTRACT: This study investigated two artificial intelligence (AI) methods for automatically classifying dental implant diameter and length based on periapical radiographs. The first method, deep learning (DL), involved utilizing the pre-trained VGG16 model and adjusting the fine-tuning degree to analyze image data obtained from periapical radiographs. The second method, clustering analysis, was accomplished by analyzing the implant-specific feature vector derived from three key points coordinates of the dental implant using the k-means++ algorithm and adjusting the weight of the feature vector. DL and clustering model classified dental implant size into nine groups. The performance metrics of AI models were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The final DL model yielded performances above 0.994, 0.950, 0.994, 0.974, 0.952, 0.994, and 0.975, respectively, and the final clustering model yielded performances above 0.983, 0.900, 0.988, 0.923, 0.909, 0.988, and 0.947, respectively. When comparing the AI model before tuning and the final AI model, statistically significant performance improvements were observed in six out of nine groups for DL models and four out of nine groups for clustering models based on AUC-ROC. Two AI models showed reliable classification performances. For clinical applications, AI models require validation on various multicenter data.

SUBMITTER: Park JH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10558577 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs.

Park Ji-Hyun JH Moon Hong Seok HS Jung Hoi-In HI Hwang JaeJoon J Choi Yoon-Ho YH Kim Jong-Eun JE

Scientific reports 20231006 1

This study investigated two artificial intelligence (AI) methods for automatically classifying dental implant diameter and length based on periapical radiographs. The first method, deep learning (DL), involved utilizing the pre-trained VGG16 model and adjusting the fine-tuning degree to analyze image data obtained from periapical radiographs. The second method, clustering analysis, was accomplished by analyzing the implant-specific feature vector derived from three key points coordinates of the ...[more]

PMID: 37803022

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Dental implant failure is a critical condition that can seriously compromise therapeutic efficacy. Insufficient bone volume, unfavorable bone quality, periodontal bone loss, and systemic conditions, including osteopenia/osteoporosis and diabetes mellitus, have been associated with implant failure. Early indicators of potential implant failure could help mitigate the risk of severe complications. This study aimed to develop an effective implant outcome prediction model using dental periapical and panoramic films. Methods A total of 248 patients (89 with failed implants and 159 with successful implants) were examined. A total of 529 periapical images and 551 panoramic images were collected from the patients for a deep learning-based model. Based on radiographic peri-implant alveolar bone pattern, implant outcome was divided into three categories: implant failure with marginal bone loss, implant failure without marginal bone loss, and implant success. We extracted features using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) and built a hybrid model to combine periapical and panoramic images. A comparison among three categories of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was performed. The diagnostic accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score of the dataset were assessed. Results Our model achieved an AUC (area under the ROC curve) of 0.972 for failure with marginal bone loss, 0.947 for failure without marginal bone loss and 0.975 for success. In all conditions, for periapical images alone, the diagnostic accuracy was 78.6%; the precision was 0.84, recall was 0.73, and F1-score was 0.75. For panoramic images alone, the diagnostic accuracy was 78.7%; the precision was 0.87, recall was 0.63, and F1-score was 0.66. Both periapical and panoramic images were used in our novel method, and the prediction accuracy was 87%. The precision was 0.85, recall was 0.88, and F1-score was 0.85. Conclusions The deep learning model used features from periapical and panoramic images to effectively predict the occurrence of implant failure and might facilitate early clinical intervention for potential dental implant failures.

Dataset Information

Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs.

Publications

Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets