Dataset Information

Breast cancer stem cells tolerate chromosomal instability during tumor progression via c-Jun/AXL stress signaling.

ABSTRACT: Chromosomal instability (CIN) is critical for tumor evolution, yet its relationship with stemness is unclear. Here, we describe CIN as a key stress induced during tumor initiation that is uniquely tolerated by breast cancer stem cells in an activated signaling state (aCSCs). While we noted elevated CIN specifically in tumors from aCSCs, this was not intrinsic to these cells, as baseline levels were similar to non-stem cell types. This suggests that CIN is induced during tumor initiation, and that aCSCs can better tolerate this stress. Further, this increased CIN may be transient, as it was only in low-burden aCSC tumors, with levels diminishing in more established disease. Phospho-array profiling revealed specific activation of c-Jun stress signaling in aCSCs, which we hypothesized could induce genes responsible for CIN tolerance. Indeed, we identified AXL as a c-Jun dependent gene enriched in aCSCs that enhances resistance to this stress. Thus, CIN tolerance mediated by c-Jun/AXL signaling may be a defining feature of stemness, contributing to breast cancer progression.

SUBMITTER: Baba SA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10559946 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Breast cancer stem cells tolerate chromosomal instability during tumor progression via c-Jun/AXL stress signaling.

Baba Shahnawaz A SA Sun Qi Q Mugisha Samson S Labhsetwar Shreyas S Klemke Richard R Desgrosellier Jay S JS

Heliyon 20230914 9

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is critical for tumor evolution, yet its relationship with stemness is unclear. Here, we describe CIN as a key stress induced during tumor initiation that is uniquely tolerated by breast cancer stem cells in an activated signaling state (aCSCs). While we noted elevated CIN specifically in tumors from aCSCs, this was not intrinsic to these cells, as baseline levels were similar to non-stem cell types. This suggests that CIN is induced during tumor initiation, and tha ...[more]

PMID: 37809421

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIt remains presently unclear whether disease progression in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), from early, to invasive and metastatic forms, is associated to a gradual increase in genetic instability and to a scheme of sequentially occurring Copy Number Alterations (CNAs).MethodsIn this work we set to determine the existence of such links between CRC progression and genetic instability and searched for associations with patient outcome. To this aim we analyzed a set of 162 Chromosomal Instable (CIN) CRCs comprising 131 primary carcinomas evenly distributed through stage 1 to 4, 31 metastases and 14 adenomas by array-CGH. CNA profiles were established according to disease stage and compared. We, also, asked whether the level of genomic instability was correlated to disease outcome in stage 2 and 3 CRCs. Two metrics of chromosomal instability were used; (i) Global Genomic Index (GGI), corresponding to the fraction of the genome involved in CNA, (ii) number of breakpoints (nbBP).ResultsStage 1, 2, 3 and 4 tumors did not differ significantly at the level of their CNA profiles precluding the conventional definition of a progression scheme based on increasing levels of genetic instability. Combining GGI and nbBP,we classified genomic profiles into 5 groups presenting distinct patterns of chromosomal instability and defined two risk classes of tumors, showing strong differences in outcome and hazard risk (RFS: p?=?0.012, HR?=?3; OS: p?<?0.001, HR?=?9.7). While tumors of the high risk group were characterized by frequent fractional CNAs, low risk tumors presented predominantly whole chromosomal arm CNAs. Searching for CNAs correlating with negative outcome we found that losses at 16p13.3 and 19q13.3 observed in 10% (7/72) of stage 2-3 tumors showed strong association with early relapse (p?<?0.001) and death (p?<?0.007, p?<?0.016). Both events showed frequent co-occurrence (p?<?1x10-8) and could, therefore, mark for stage 2-3 CRC susceptible to negative outcome.ConclusionsOur data show that CRC disease progression from stage 1 to stage 4 is not paralleled by increased levels of genetic instability. However, they suggest that stage 2-3 CRC with elevated genetic instability and particularly profiles with fractional CNA represent a subset of aggressive tumors.

Dataset Information

Breast cancer stem cells tolerate chromosomal instability during tumor progression via c-Jun/AXL stress signaling.

Publications

Breast cancer stem cells tolerate chromosomal instability during tumor progression via c-Jun/AXL stress signaling.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets