Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A Cascaded Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automated Lesion Detection and Classification on Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.


ABSTRACT:

Rationale and objectives

Prostate MRI improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer; however, its diagnostic performance has wide variation. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to assist radiologists in the detection and classification of prostatic lesions. Herein, we aimed to develop and test a cascaded deep learning detection and classification system trained on biparametric prostate MRI using PI-RADS for assisting radiologists during prostate MRI read out.

Materials and methods

T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted (ADC maps, high b value DWI) MRI scans obtained at 3 Tesla from two institutions (n = 1043 in-house and n = 347 Prostate-X, respectively) acquired between 2015 to 2019 were used for model training, validation, testing. All scans were retrospectively reevaluated by one radiologist. Suspicious lesions were contoured and assigned a PI-RADS category. A 3D U-Net-based deep neural network was used to train an algorithm for automated detection and segmentation of prostate MRI lesions. Two 3D residual neural network were used for a 4-class classification task to predict PI-RADS categories 2 to 5 and BPH. Training and validation used 89% (n = 1290 scans) of the data using 5 fold cross-validation, the remaining 11% (n = 150 scans) were used for independent testing. Algorithm performance at lesion level was assessed using sensitivities, positive predictive values (PPV), false discovery rates (FDR), classification accuracy, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Additional analysis was conducted to compare AI algorithm's lesion detection performance with targeted biopsy results.

Results

Median age was 66 years (IQR = 60-71), PSA 6.7 ng/ml (IQR = 4.7-9.9) from in-house cohort. In the independent test set, algorithm correctly detected 111 of 198 lesions leading to 56.1% (49.3%-62.6%) sensitivity. PPV was 62.7% (95% CI 54.7%-70.7%) with FDR of 37.3% (95% CI 29.3%-45.3%). Of 79 true positive lesions, 82.3% were tumor positive at targeted biopsy, whereas of 57 false negative lesions, 50.9% were benign at targeted biopsy. Median DSC for lesion segmentation was 0.359. Overall PI-RADS classification accuracy was 30.8% (95% CI 24.6%-37.8%).

Conclusion

Our cascaded U-Net, residual network architecture can detect, classify cancer suspicious lesions at prostate MRI with good detection, reasonable classification performance metrics.

SUBMITTER: Mehralivand S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10575564 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A Cascaded Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automated Lesion Detection and Classification on Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Mehralivand Sherif S   Yang Dong D   Harmon Stephanie A SA   Xu Daguang D   Xu Ziyue Z   Roth Holger H   Masoudi Samira S   Sanford Thomas H TH   Kesani Deepak D   Lay Nathan S NS   Merino Maria J MJ   Wood Bradford J BJ   Pinto Peter A PA   Choyke Peter L PL   Turkbey Baris B  

Academic radiology 20210928 8


<h4>Rationale and objectives</h4>Prostate MRI improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer; however, its diagnostic performance has wide variation. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to assist radiologists in the detection and classification of prostatic lesions. Herein, we aimed to develop and test a cascaded deep learning detection and classification system trained on biparametric prostate MRI using PI-RADS for assisting radiologists during prostate MRI read out.<h4  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9983908 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10545512 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8229869 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10669580 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9990955 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11761327 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10432383 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10589267 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10851006 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11356718 | biostudies-literature