Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
Outcome analysis of urachal cancer (UraC) is limited due to the scarcity of cases and different staging methods compared to urothelial bladder cancer (UroBC). We attempted to assess survival outcomes of UraC and compare to UroBC after stage-matched analyses.Materials and methods
Total 203 UraC patients from a multicenter database and 373 UroBC patients in single institution from 2000 to 2018 were enrolled (median follow-up, 32 months). Sheldon stage conversion to corresponding TNM staging for UraC was conducted for head-to-head comparison to UroBC. Perioperative clinical variables and pathological results were recorded. Stage-matched analyses for survival by stage were conducted.Results
UraC patients were younger (mean age, 54 vs. 67 years; p < 0.001), with
SUBMITTER: Song SH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10582549 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature