Dataset Information

Systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The optimal aortic valve substitute for non-elderly adults remains controversial. Recently, considerable data on the Ross procedure have accumulated. This study aimed to analyze long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure from the current literature using a meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes.

Methods

A literature search was performed with MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through June 2022; studies reporting clinical outcomes of the Ross procedure beyond 20 years were included for analysis. The outcomes of interest were late survival and freedom from surgical or percutaneous reintervention of the autograft or right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT).

Results

Six studies, including 4,910 patients (3,601 males), were identified and analyzed. Survival rate at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 99.9%±0.1%, 97.6%±0.5%, 94.3%±0.9%, and 87.4%±1.9%. Freedom from autograft reintervention at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 97.7%±0.5%, 95.3%±0.7%, 91.4%±1.2%, 84.8%±2.5%. Freedom from RVOT reintervention was 99.0%±0.3%, 99.0%±0.3%, 97.5%±0.7%, 93.3%±1.8%. Freedom from any valve reintervention (either autograft or RVOT) at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 95.8%±0.6%, 92.6%±0.9%, 88.5%±1.2%, 80.8%±2.5%.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrated that the Ross procedure was confirmed to provide excellent survival despite the need for reintervention of autograft or RVOT in approximately 20% of patients at 20 years.

SUBMITTER: Shimamura J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10586942 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure.

Shimamura Junichi J Fukuhara Shinichi S Yokoyama Yujiro Y Takagi Hisato H Ouzounian Maral M Kuno Toshiki T

Journal of thoracic disease 20230814 9

<h4>Background</h4>The optimal aortic valve substitute for non-elderly adults remains controversial. Recently, considerable data on the Ross procedure have accumulated. This study aimed to analyze long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure from the current literature using a meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>A literature search was performed with MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through June 2022; studies reporting clinical outcomes ...[more]

PMID: 37868903

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThere is no ideal valve substitute for young adults requiring aortic valve replacement. Multicenter data supporting use of the Ross procedure with respect to long-term postoperative valve-related mortality and reintervention, as well as function of the autograft and pulmonary homograft, are needed.ObjectiveTo determine the long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in young and middle-aged patients undergoing the Ross procedure.Design, setting, and participantsA retrospective multicenter international cohort study with a median follow-up period of 9.2 years was conducted in 5 experienced centers regularly performing the Ross procedure. Consecutive patients aged 18 to 65 years were included by each center between 1991 and 2018.Main outcomes and measuresSurvival and autograft-related and homograft-related reintervention. Serial echocardiographic measurements of valve function were analyzed using mixed-effects modeling.ResultsDuring the study period, 1431 patients (74.3% men; n = 1063) were operated on at a median age of 48.5 years (mean [SD], 47.7 [9.5]; range, 18.1-65; interquartile range, 42.7-54.0). Implantation techniques were root inclusion in 355 (24.9%), root replacement in 485 (34.0%), and subcoronary implantation in 587 (41.1%). Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction was performed with homografts in 98.6% (n = 1189) and bioprostheses in 1.4% (n = 17). Ten patients (0.7%) died before discharge. Median follow-up was 9.2 years (13 015 total patient-years). Survival after 10 and 15 years was 95.1% (95% CI, 93.8%-96.5%) and 88.5% (95% CI, 85.9%-91.1%), respectively. Freedom from autograft and homograft reintervention after 15 years was 92.0% and 97.2%, respectively. Late events were autograft endocarditis in 14 patients (0.11% per patient-year), homograft endocarditis in 11 patients (0.08% per patient-year), and stroke in 37 patients (0.3% per patient-year).Conclusions and relevanceGiven its excellent short-term and long-term outcome in young and middle-aged adults in this study, the Ross procedure should be considered in young and middle-aged adults who require aortic valve replacement. Patients should be referred to an experienced center with a program dedicated to the Ross procedure.

Project description:BackgroundThe ideal conduit for repair of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) during the Ross procedure remains unclear and has yet to be fully elucidated. We perform a pairwise meta-analysis to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of decellularized versus cryopreserved pulmonary allografts for RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure.Main bodyAfter a comprehensive literature search, studies comparing decellularized and cryopreserved allografts for patients undergoing RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure were pooled to perform a pairwise meta-analysis using the random-effects model. Primary outcomes were early mortality and follow-up allograft dysfunction. Secondary outcomes were reintervention rates and follow-up endocarditis. A total of 4 studies including 1687 patients undergoing RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure were included. A total of 812 patients received a decellularized pulmonary allograft, while 875 received a cryopreserved pulmonary allograft. Compared to cryopreserved allografts, the decellularized group showed similar rates of early mortality (odds ratio, 0.55, 95% confidence interval, 0.21-1.41, P = 0.22). At a mean follow-up period of 5.89 years, no significant difference was observed between the two groups for follow-up allograft dysfunction (hazard ratio, 0.65, 95% confidence interval, 0.20-2.14, P = 0.48). Similarly, no difference was seen in reintervention rates (hazard ratio, 0.54, 95% confidence interval, 0.09-3.12, P = 0.49) nor endocarditis (hazard ratio, 0.30, 95% confidence interval, 0.07-1.35, P = 0.12) at a mean follow-up of 4.85 and 5.75 years, respectively.ConclusionsDecellularized and cryopreserved pulmonary allografts are associated with similar postoperative outcomes for RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure. Larger propensity-matched and randomized control trials are necessary to elucidate the efficacy of decellularized allografts compared to cryopreserved allografts in the setting of the Ross.

Project description:ImportanceThe ideal aortic valve substitute in young and middle-aged adults remains unknown.ObjectiveTo compare long-term outcomes between the Ross procedure and mechanical aortic valve replacement in adults.Data sourcesThe Ovid versions of MEDLINE and EMBASE classic (January 1, 1967, to April 26, 2018; search performed on April 27, 2018) were screened for relevant studies using the following text word search in the title or abstract: ("Ross" OR "autograft") AND ("aortic" OR "mechanical").Study selectionAll randomized clinical trials and observational studies comparing the Ross procedure to the use of mechanical prostheses in adults undergoing aortic valve replacement were included. Studies were included if they reported any of the prespecified primary or secondary outcomes. Studies were excluded if no clinical outcomes were reported or if data were published only as an abstract. Citations were screened in duplicate by 2 of the authors, and disagreements regarding inclusion were reconciled via consensus.Data extraction and synthesisThis meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Data were independently abstracted by 3 reviewers and pooled using a random-effects model.Main outcomes and measuresThe prespecified primary outcome was all-cause mortality.ResultsThe search identified 2919 reports, of which 18 studies (3516 patients) met inclusion criteria, including 1 randomized clinical trial and 17 observational studies, with a median average follow-up of 5.8 (interquartile range, 3.4-9.2) years. Analysis of the primary outcome showed a 46% lower all-cause mortality in patients undergoing the Ross procedure compared with mechanical aortic valve replacement (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.82; P = .004; I2 = 28%). The Ross procedure was also associated with lower rates of stroke (IRR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.80; P = .02; I2 = 8%) and major bleeding (IRR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07-0.40; P < .001; I2 = 0%) but higher rates of reintervention (IRR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.16-2.65; P = .007; I2 = 0%).Conclusions and relevanceData from primarily observational studies suggest that the Ross procedure is associated with lower all-cause mortality compared with mechanical aortic valve replacement. These findings highlight the need for a large, prospective randomized clinical trial comparing long-term outcomes between these 2 interventions.

Project description:BackgroundPulmonary autograft reinforcement to prevent dilatation and subsequent neo-aortic valve regurgitation has been reported; however, data on long-term function of the neo-aortic valve after this modified Ross procedure are lacking. Our objective here was to assess long-term outcomes of the modified Ross procedure with autograft reinforcement using the reimplantation technique.PatientsThe outcomes of 61 consecutive patients managed using the Dacron-conduit reinforced Ross procedure between 2009 and 2021 were reviewed. Most patients had a unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve (n = 52; 85%), predominant aortic valve regurgitation (n = 42; 77%), and >30 mm dilatation of the ascending aorta (n = 33; 54%). A prior aortic valve procedure was noted in 47 patients (77%) patients, including 38 (62%) with surgical repair and 9 (15%) with balloon dilatation. The pulmonary autograft was reimplanted within a Dacron conduit with a median diameter of 25.6 mm (range, 20-30 mm) using the David valve-sparing aortic root replacement technique.ResultsAll patients survived. The median age at surgery was 16.8 years (range, 6-38 years). Neo-aortic valve replacement was required in 3 patients (4.9%; 95% CI, 0.34%- 12.7%) because of infective endocarditis, left ventricular false aneurysm, and leaflet perforation, respectively; the repeat procedure was done early in 2 of these patients (2 of 61; 3%). Six patients required right ventricular outflow conduit replacement, 5 by surgery and 1 percutaneously. The median duration of follow-up was 90 months (range, 10-124 months). The 5- and 10-year rates of reintervention-free survival were 84.3% (95% CI, 74%-95%) and 81.6% (95% CI, 72%-93%), respectively, and 5-year survival without aortic reintervention was 94.5% (95% CI, 88%-100%), with little change at 10 years. No patients experienced deterioration of initial neo-aortic valve function (ie, regurgitation or stenosis).ConclusionsAutograft reinforcement using the reimplantation technique allowed expansion of Ross procedure indications to all patients requiring aortic valve replacement and prevented neo-aortic root dilatation. Failures were uncommon. Long-term follow-up data showed stable neo-aortic valve function.

Dataset Information

Systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets