Dataset Information

A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on radiologists' preferences regarding quality assurance measures of image interpretation in screening and diagnostic mammography.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Quality assurance (QA) of image interpretation plays a key role in screening and diagnostic mammography, maintaining minimum standards and supporting continuous improvement in interpreting images. However, the QA structure across Europe shows considerable variation. The European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) conducted a survey among the members to collect information on radiologists' preferences regarding QA measures in mammography.

Materials and methods

An anonymous online survey consisting of 25 questions was distributed to all EUSOBI members and national breast radiology bodies in Europe. The questions were designed to collect demographic characteristics, information on responders' mammography workload and data about QA measures currently used in their country. Data was analysed using descriptive statistical analysis, the χ² test, linear regression, and Durbin-Watson statistic test.

Results

In total, 251 breast radiologists from 34 countries completed the survey. Most respondents were providing both screening and symptomatic services (137/251, 54.6%), working in an academic hospital (85/251, 33.9%) and reading 1000-4999 cases per year (109/251, 43.4%). More than half of them (133/251, 53%) had established QA measures in their workplace. Although less than one-third (71/251, 28.3%) had to participate in regular performance testing, the vast majority (190/251, 75.7%) agreed that a mandatory test would be helpful to improve their skills.

Conclusion

QA measures were in place for more than half of the respondents working in screening and diagnostic mammography to evaluate their breast imaging performance. Although there were substantial differences between countries, the importance of having QA in the workplace and implemented was widely acknowledged by radiologists.

Clinical relevance statement

Although several quality assurance (QA) measures of image interpretation are recommended by European bodies or national organisations, the QA in mammography is quite heterogenous between countries and reporting settings, and not always actively implemented across Europe.

Key points

The first survey that presents radiologists' preferences regarding QA measures of image interpretation in mammography. Quality assurance measures in the workplace are better-established for breast screening compared to diagnostic mammography. Radiologists consider that performance tests would help to improve their mammography interpretation skills.

SUBMITTER: Michalopoulou E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10598074 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on radiologists' preferences regarding quality assurance measures of image interpretation in screening and diagnostic mammography.

Michalopoulou Eleni E Clauser Paola P Gilbert Fiona J FJ Pijnappel Ruud M RM Mann Ritse M RM Baltzer Pascal A T PAT Chen Yan Y Fallenberg Eva Maria EM

European radiology 20231101 11

<h4>Objectives</h4>Quality assurance (QA) of image interpretation plays a key role in screening and diagnostic mammography, maintaining minimum standards and supporting continuous improvement in interpreting images. However, the QA structure across Europe shows considerable variation. The European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) conducted a survey among the members to collect information on radiologists' preferences regarding QA measures in mammography.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>An anonymo ...[more]

PMID: 37481690

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo study how radiologists' perceived ability to interpret digital mammography (DM) images is affected by decreases in image quality.MethodsOne view from 45 DM cases (including 30 cancers) was degraded to six levels each of two acquisition-related issues (lower spatial resolution and increased quantum noise) and three post-processing-related issues (lower and higher contrast and increased correlated noise) seen during clinical evaluation of DM systems. The images were shown to fifteen breast screening radiologists from five countries. Aware of lesion location, the radiologists selected the most-degraded mammogram (indexed from 1 (reference) to 7 (most degraded)) they still felt was acceptable for interpretation. The median selected index, per degradation type, was calculated separately for calcification and soft tissue (including normal) cases. Using the two-sided, non-parametric Mann-Whitney test, the median indices for each case and degradation type were compared.ResultsRadiologists were not tolerant to increases (medians: 1.5 (calcifications) and 2 (soft tissue)) or decreases (median: 2, for both types) in contrast, but were more tolerant to correlated noise (median: 3, for both types). Increases in quantum noise were tolerated more for calcifications than for soft tissue cases (medians: 3 vs. 4, p = 0.02). Spatial resolution losses were considered less acceptable for calcification detection than for soft tissue cases (medians: 3.5 vs. 5, p = 0.001).ConclusionsPerceived ability of radiologists for image interpretation in DM was affected not only by image acquisition-related issues but also by image post-processing issues, and some of those issues affected calcification cases more than soft tissue cases.Key points• Lower spatial resolution and increased quantum noise affected the radiologists' perceived ability to interpret calcification cases more than soft tissue lesion or normal cases. • Post-acquisition image processing-related effects, not only image acquisition-related effects, also impact the perceived ability of radiologists to interpret images and detect lesions. • In addition to current practices, post-acquisition image processing-related effects need to also be considered during the testing and evaluation of digital mammography systems.

Project description:BackgroundQuality assurance for acute in-hospital care in Germany is based on compulsory comparisons between institutions, so-called external quality assurance (EQA). The effectiveness of EQA has not yet been adequately studied. The purpose of the QUASCH project, which is supported by the Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee, is to investigate the association between EQA and health care outcomes, specifically with respect to stroke.MethodsThe analyses were based on data from 379 825 patients insured by the AOK health insurance fund who were acutely admitted to a hospital because of stroke over the period 2007-2017. Data on 47 659 patients were derived from EQA documentation in the state of Hesse, in which stroke EQA had already been introduced in 2003; data on the remaining 332 166 patients were from other federal states, where 117 734 of these patients had been treated under EQA conditions. The association of EQA with mortality over the period of observation was analyzed by multivariate Cox regression, with the following covariates: age, sex, comorbidities, time period of occurrence, nursing care level, type of stroke, socio-economic deprivation in the region of origin, and treatment in a stroke unit.ResultsCompared to treatment without EQA, mortality risk under EQA in the state of Hesse was significantly lower (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: [0.92; 0.95]). The reduction in mortality risk with EQA was somewhat lower in the other federal states (HR: 0.96 [0.95; 0.97]). Treatment in a stroke unit was associated with a mortality risk that was lower still (HR: 0.86 [0.85; 0.87]). Mortality risk rose with age, comorbidities, and need for nursing care; it was lower in women and in persons whose stroke occurred in a later period.ConclusionQuality assurance measures are associated with lower mortality risk after stroke. The concentration of care in specially qualified institutions is associated with stronger effects than EQA alone.

Dataset Information

A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on radiologists' preferences regarding quality assurance measures of image interpretation in screening and diagnostic mammography.

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance statement

Key points

Publications

A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on radiologists' preferences regarding quality assurance measures of image interpretation in screening and diagnostic mammography.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets