Dataset Information

Systematic analysis of paralogous regions in 41,755 exomes uncovers clinically relevant variation.

ABSTRACT: The short lengths of short-read sequencing reads challenge the analysis of paralogous genomic regions in exome and genome sequencing data. Most genetic variants within these homologous regions therefore remain unidentified in standard analyses. Here, we present a method (Chameleolyser) that accurately identifies single nucleotide variants and small insertions/deletions (SNVs/Indels), copy number variants and ectopic gene conversion events in duplicated genomic regions using whole-exome sequencing data. Application to a cohort of 41,755 exome samples yields 20,432 rare homozygous deletions and 2,529,791 rare SNVs/Indels, of which we show that 338,084 are due to gene conversion events. None of the SNVs/Indels are detectable using regular analysis techniques. Validation by high-fidelity long-read sequencing in 20 samples confirms >88% of called variants. Focusing on variation in known disease genes leads to a direct molecular diagnosis in 25 previously undiagnosed patients. Our method can readily be applied to existing exome data.

SUBMITTER: Steyaert W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10611741 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Systematic analysis of paralogous regions in 41,755 exomes uncovers clinically relevant variation.

Steyaert Wouter W Haer-Wigman Lonneke L Pfundt Rolph R Hellebrekers Debby D Steehouwer Marloes M Hampstead Juliet J de Boer Elke E Stegmann Alexander A Yntema Helger H Kamsteeg Erik-Jan EJ Brunner Han H Hoischen Alexander A Gilissen Christian C

Nature communications 20231027 1

The short lengths of short-read sequencing reads challenge the analysis of paralogous genomic regions in exome and genome sequencing data. Most genetic variants within these homologous regions therefore remain unidentified in standard analyses. Here, we present a method (Chameleolyser) that accurately identifies single nucleotide variants and small insertions/deletions (SNVs/Indels), copy number variants and ectopic gene conversion events in duplicated genomic regions using whole-exome sequencin ...[more]

PMID: 37891200

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveProstate cancer (PCa) is a complex disease characterized by diverse cellular ecosystems within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and high tumor heterogeneity, which challenges clinically stratified management and reinforces the need for novel strategies to fight against castration-resistant PCa (CRPC).MethodsWe performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on 10 untreated primary PCa tissues and integrated public scRNA-seq resources from three normal prostate tissues, two untreated primary PCa tissues, and six CRPC tumors to portray a comprehensive cellular and molecular interaction atlas of PCa. We further integrated the single-cell and bulk transcriptomes of PCa to establish a molecular classification system.ResultsscRNA-seq profiles revealed substantial inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity across different cell subpopulations in untreated PCa and CRPC tumors. In the malignant epithelial reservoir, cells evolved along decoupled paths in treatment-naive PCa and CRPC tumors, and distinct transcriptional reprogramming processes were activated, highlighting anti-androgen therapy-induced lineage plasticity. Based on the specifically expressed markers of the epithelial subpopulations, we conducted unsupervised clustering analysis in The Cancer Genome Atlas prostate adenocarcinoma (TCGA-PRAD) cohort and identified three molecularly and clinically distinct subtypes. The C1 subtype, characterized by high enrichment of CRPC-enriched epithelial cells, had a high risk of rapid development of anti-androgen resistance and might require active surveillance and additional promising intervention treatments, such as integrin A3 (ITGA3) + integrin B1 (ITGB1) inhibition. The C2 subtype resembled the immune-modulated subtype that was most likely to benefit from anti-LAG3 immunotherapy. The C3 subtype had a favorable prognosis.ConclusionsOur study provides a comprehensive and high-resolution landscape of the intricate architecture of the PCa TME, and our trichotomic molecular taxonomy could help facilitate precision oncology.

Project description:BackgroundDigital clinical measures collected via various digital sensing technologies such as smartphones, smartwatches, wearables, ingestibles, and implantables are increasingly used by individuals and clinicians to capture health outcomes or behavioral and physiological characteristics of individuals. Although academia is taking an active role in evaluating digital sensing products, academic contributions to advancing the safe, effective, ethical, and equitable use of digital clinical measures are poorly characterized.ObjectiveWe performed a systematic review to characterize the nature of academic research on digital clinical measures and to compare and contrast the types of sensors used and the sources of funding support for specific subareas of this research.MethodsWe conducted a PubMed search using a range of search terms to retrieve peer-reviewed articles reporting US-led academic research on digital clinical measures between January 2019 and February 2021. We screened each publication against specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then identified and categorized research studies based on the types of academic research, sensors used, and funding sources. Finally, we compared and contrasted the funding support for these specific subareas of research and sensor types.ResultsThe search retrieved 4240 articles of interest. Following the screening, 295 articles remained for data extraction and categorization. The top five research subareas included operations research (research analysis; n=225, 76%), analytical validation (n=173, 59%), usability and utility (data visualization; n=123, 42%), verification (n=93, 32%), and clinical validation (n=83, 28%). The three most underrepresented areas of research into digital clinical measures were ethics (n=0, 0%), security (n=1, 0.5%), and data rights and governance (n=1, 0.5%). Movement and activity trackers were the most commonly studied sensor type, and physiological (mechanical) sensors were the least frequently studied. We found that government agencies are providing the most funding for research on digital clinical measures (n=192, 65%), followed by independent foundations (n=109, 37%) and industries (n=56, 19%), with the remaining 12% (n=36) of these studies completely unfunded.ConclusionsSpecific subareas of academic research related to digital clinical measures are not keeping pace with the rapid expansion and adoption of digital sensing products. An integrated and coordinated effort is required across academia, academic partners, and academic funders to establish the field of digital clinical measures as an evidence-based field worthy of our trust.

Dataset Information

Systematic analysis of paralogous regions in 41,755 exomes uncovers clinically relevant variation.

Publications

Systematic analysis of paralogous regions in 41,755 exomes uncovers clinically relevant variation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets