Dataset Information

Development and internal validation of a model predicting patient-reported shoulder function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Swiss setting.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Prediction models for outcomes after orthopedic surgery provide patients with evidence-based postoperative outcome expectations. Our objectives were (1) to identify prognostic factors associated with the postoperative shoulder function outcome (the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)) and (2) to develop and validate a prediction model for postoperative OSS.

Methods

Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) were prospectively documented at a Swiss orthopedic tertiary care center. The first primary ARCR in adult patients with a partial or complete rotator cuff tear were included between October 2013 and June 2021. Thirty-two potential prognostic factors were used for prediction model development. Two sets of factors identified using the knowledge from three experienced surgeons (Set 1) and Bayesian projection predictive variable selection (Set 2) were compared in terms of model performance using R squared and root-mean-squared error (RMSE) across 45 multiple imputed data sets using chained equations and complete case data.

Results

Multiple imputation using data from 1510 patients was performed. Set 2 retained the following factors: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, baseline level of depression and anxiety, baseline OSS, operation duration, tear severity, and biceps status and treatment. Apparent model performance was R-squared = 0.174 and RMSE = 7.514, dropping to R-squared = 0.156, and RMSE = 7.603 after correction for optimism.

Conclusion

A prediction model for patients undergoing ARCR was developed using solely baseline and operative data in order to provide patients and surgeons with individualized expectations for postoperative shoulder function outcomes. Yet, model performance should be improved before being used in clinical routine.

SUBMITTER: Stojanov T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10629040 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Development and internal validation of a model predicting patient-reported shoulder function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Swiss setting.

Stojanov Thomas T Aghlmandi Soheila S Müller Andreas Marc AM Scheibel Markus M Flury Matthias M Audigé Laurent L

Diagnostic and prognostic research 20231107 1

<h4>Background</h4>Prediction models for outcomes after orthopedic surgery provide patients with evidence-based postoperative outcome expectations. Our objectives were (1) to identify prognostic factors associated with the postoperative shoulder function outcome (the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)) and (2) to develop and validate a prediction model for postoperative OSS.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) were prospectively documented at a Swiss orthopedic te ...[more]

PMID: 37932868

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo compare patient-reported and surgical outcome measures in patients with and without secondary shoulder stiffness (SSS) undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR).MethodsPatients undergoing rotator cuff repair from 2014 to 2020 with complete patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by the short-form 12 survey (SF-12) were retrospectively reviewed to identify if operative intervention for SSS was performed alongside the RCR. Those patients with operative intervention for SSS were propensity matched to a group without prior intervention for stiffness by age, sex, laterality, body mass index, diabetes mellitus status, and the presence of a thyroid disorder. The groups were compared by rotator cuff tear (RCT) size, surgical outcomes, further surgical intervention, rotator cuff retear rate, postoperative range of motion (ROM), and SF-12 results at 1 year after surgery. Delta values were calculated for component scores of the SF-12 and ROM values by subtracting the preoperative result from the postoperative result.ResultsA total of 89 patients with SSS were compared to 156 patients in the control group at final analysis. The patients in the SSS group experienced a significant improvement in the delta mental health component score (MCS-12) of the SF-12 survey that was not seen in the control group (P = .005 to P = .539). Both groups experienced significant improvement by the delta physical health component score (PCS-12) of the SF-12 survey (SSS: 7.68; P < .001; control: 6.95; P < .001). The SSS group also experienced greater improvement of their forward flexion (25.8° vs 12.9°; P = .005) and external rotation (7.13° vs 1.65°; P = .031) ROM than the control group.ConclusionsOperative intervention of SSS at the time of RCR has equivalent postoperative SF-12 survey outcome scores when compared to patients undergoing RCR without preoperative stiffness despite those patients having lower preoperative scores.Level of evidenceLevel III retrospective comparative study.

Project description:BackgroundPostoperative pain is well known and usually disturbing complication of arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Inflammation plays an important role in the development and progression of postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictability of postoperative pain through the correlation of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with inflammation. In addition, the correlation of parameters such as operative time, tear size, age and gender with postoperative pain was evaluated.MethodsSixty three patients, who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, were evaluated in this single-center-based retrospective study. The American Society of Anaesthesiologists I and II risk groups were determined as the inclusion criteria. NLR was calculated using preoperative one day hemogram values in all patients. The amounts of analgesic use and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at the 12th, 24th and 48th hours and on the 3rd and 7th days were recorded. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to correlate postoperative NRS scores with multiple independent factors, including preoperative NLR, sex, age, tear size, repair type, operative time, block time, postoperative analgesic intake and length of hospital stay.ResultsSixty three patients with a mean age of 59.4 years (range, 40-72 years) were evaluated. The mean tear size was 2.8 cm (range, 1-5 cm), the mean operative time was 84.1 min (range, 35-135 min), the mean duration of block was 7.6 hours (range, 4-12 hours) and the mean length of hospital stay was 1.7 days (range, 1-3 days). There was no significant correlation between age, sex, tear size, repair type, operative time and postoperative NRS (p > 0.2). The preoperative NLR was found to be a strong predictor of postoperative NRS (p < 0.001, rho = 0,864). There was a correlation between the NLR and mean analgesic intake (p = 0,03). The duration of block was decreased in patients with a NLR above 2, while it was prolonged in patients with a NLR below 2 (p = 0.04, rho = -0,725).ConclusionThe preoperative NLR was found to be a strongest factor predicting high acute pain levels after arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. Likewise, NLR was also predictive of postoperative block time and analgesic consumption.

Project description:Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can be challenging and requires adequate visualization and space. However, the narrow subacromial space can make difficult to perform tendon release and repair under arthroscopy. Inadequate visualization may lead to inaccurate suture placement, compromising the reduction and fixation of the repaired rotator cuff tendons. Manual or mechanical distraction (using an arm positioner) can be used to increase the working space. However, consistent distraction is very difficult to maintain manually over time due to fatigue, whereas mechanical distraction may overstretch the brachial plexus. To overcome these difficulties, we describe a technique using a specific laminar spreader for subacromial distraction during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The arthroscopic laminar spreader, inserted into the subacromial space, is used to distract the humeral head inferiorly from the acromion, improving subacromial space visualization and enabling easily rotator cuff release and repair. The shoulder distraction device improves the surgeon’s performance without surgical assistance and allows reducing the operative time with safety. It can be also used anteriorly (to repair the subscapularis) or posteriorly (to repair the infraspinatus and teres minor) or to perform other procedures like superior capsular reconstruction or additional patch. Technique Video Video 1 Arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair using an arthroscopic laminar spreader: single-row (tension-band suture) placing anchors in the lateral part of the greater tuberosity. Even though acromioplasty has been performed, there is little space to place the sutures through the cuff tendons. The arthroscopic laminar spreader is placed between the acromion and the tendon of the cuff through the anterolateral portal. Introducing the suture hook through the anteromedial portal, it becomes easy to pass the suture through the tendon because the tendon is under pressure with the laminar spreader. Classical repair procedure is shown, using a grasper to retrieve one of the anchor sutures and the polydioxanone suture, which is used as a shuttle to pass it through the tendon. Both strands of sutures are tied with the use of a sliding-locking knot. The laminar spreader is introducing again for the second suture. The arthroscopic laminar spreader opened more than 4 cm. Under fluoroscopic view, the subacromial space increased with the use of the spreader.

Dataset Information

Development and internal validation of a model predicting patient-reported shoulder function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Swiss setting.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Development and internal validation of a model predicting patient-reported shoulder function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Swiss setting.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets