Static and dynamic fMRI-derived functional connectomes represent largely similar information.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Functional connectivity (FC) of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI time series can be estimated using methods that differ in sensitivity to the temporal order of time points (static vs. dynamic) and the number of regions considered in estimating a single edge (bivariate vs. multivariate). Previous research suggests that dynamic FC explains variability in FC fluctuations and behavior beyond static FC. Our aim was to systematically compare methods on both dimensions. We compared five FC methods: Pearson's/full correlation (static, bivariate), lagged correlation (dynamic, bivariate), partial correlation (static, multivariate), and multivariate AR model with and without self-connections (dynamic, multivariate). We compared these methods by (i) assessing similarities between FC matrices,
SUBMITTER: Matkovic A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10631791 | biostudies-literature | 2023
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA