Project description:BackgroundTo achieve full benefits of vaccination programmes, high uptake and timely receipt of vaccinations are required.ObjectivesTo examine uptake and timeliness of infant and pre-school booster vaccines using cohort study data linked to health records.MethodsWe included 1782 children, born between 2000 and 2001, participating in the Millennium Cohort Study and resident in Wales, whose parents gave consent for linkage to National Community Child Health Database records at the age seven year contact. We examined age at receipt, timeliness of vaccination (early, on-time, delayed, or never), and intervals between vaccine doses, based on the recommended schedule for children at that time, of the following vaccines: primary (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (DTP), polio, Meningococcal C (Men C), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)); first dose of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR); and pre-school childhood vaccinations (DTP, polio, MMR). We compared parental report with child health recorded MMR vaccination status at age three years.ResultsWhile 94% of children received the first dose of primary vaccines early or on time, this was lower for subsequent doses (82%, 65% and 88% for second and third doses and pre-school booster respectively). Median intervals between doses exceeded the recommended schedule for all but the first dose with marked variation between children. There was high concordance (97%) between parental reported and child health recorded MMR status.ConclusionsRoutine immunisation records provide useful information on timely receipt of vaccines and can be used to assess the quality of childhood vaccination programmes. Parental report of MMR vaccine status is reliable.
Project description:ObjectiveTo explore parents' and guardians' views and experiences of accessing National Health Service (NHS) general practices for routine childhood vaccinations during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in England.DesignMixed methods approach involving an online cross-sectional survey (conducted between 19th April and 11th May 2020) and semi-structured telephone interviews (conducted between 27th April and 27th May 2020).Participants1252 parents and guardians (aged 16+ years) who reported living in England with a child aged 18 months or under completed the survey. Nineteen survey respondents took part in follow-up interviews.ResultsThe majority of survey respondents (85.7%) considered it important for their children to receive routine vaccinations on schedule during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, several barriers to vaccination were identified. These included a lack of clarity around whether vaccination services were operating as usual, particularly amongst respondents from lower income households and those self-reporting as Black, Asian, Chinese, Mixed or Other ethnicity; difficulties in organising vaccination appointments; and fears around contracting COVID-19 while attending general practice. Concerns about catching COVID-19 while accessing general practice were weighed against concerns about children acquiring a vaccine-preventable disease if they did not receive scheduled routine childhood vaccinations. Many parents and guardians felt their child's risk of acquiring a vaccine-preventable disease was low as the implementation of stringent physical distancing measures (from March 23rd 2020) meant they were not mixing with others.ConclusionTo promote routine childhood vaccination uptake during the current COVID-19 outbreak, further waves of COVID-19 infection, and future pandemics, prompt and sustained national and general practice level communication is needed to raise awareness of vaccination service continuation and the importance of timely vaccination, and invitation-reminder systems for vaccination need to be maintained. To allay concerns about the safety of accessing general practice, practices should communicate the measures being implemented to prevent COVID-19 transmission.
Project description:Inequity in routine childhood vaccination coverage is well researched. Pandemics disrupt infrastructure and divert health resources from preventive care, including vaccination programmes, leading to increased vaccine preventable morbidity and mortality. COVID-19 control measures have resulted in coverage reductions. We conducted a rapid review of the impact of pandemics on existing inequities in routine vaccination coverage. PICO search framework: Population: children 0-18 years; Intervention/exposure: pandemic/epidemic; Comparison: inequality; Outcome: routine vaccination coverage. The review demonstrates a gap in the literature as none of the 29 papers selected for full-paper review from 1973 abstracts identified from searches met the inclusion criteria.
Project description:BackgroundAs Canada and other high-income countries continue to welcome newcomers, we aimed to 1) understand newcomer parents' attitudes towards routine-childhood vaccinations (RCVs), and 2) identify barriers newcomer parents face when accessing RCVs in Alberta, Canada.MethodsBetween July 6th-August 31st, 2022, we recruited participants from Alberta, Canada to participate in moderated focus group discussions. Inclusion criteria included parents who had lived in Canada for < 5 years with children < 18 years old. Focus groups were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content and deductive thematic analysis. The capability opportunity motivation behaviour model was used as our conceptual framework.ResultsFour virtual and three in-person focus groups were conducted with 47 participants. Overall, parents were motivated and willing to vaccinate their children but experienced several barriers related to their capability and opportunity to access RCVs. Five main themes emerged: 1) lack of reputable information about RCVs, 2) language barriers when looking for information and asking questions about RCVs, 3) lack of access to a primary care provider (PCP), 4) lack of affordable and convenient transportation options, and 5) due to the COVID-19 pandemic, lack of available vaccine appointments. Several minor themes were also identified and included barriers such as lack of 1) childcare, vaccine record sharing, PCP follow-up.ConclusionsOur findings highlight that several barriers faced by newcomer families ultimately stem from issues related to accessing information about RCVs and the challenges families face once at vaccination clinics, highlighting opportunities for health systems to better support newcomers in accessing RCVs.
Project description:ObjectiveTo describe the incidence of Kawasaki Disease (kDa) between 2006 and 2021 in England.MethodsWe identified all cases in hospital episode statistics with an ICD-10 diagnostic code M303 (for kDa) between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2021. We validated 83 diagnoses using hospital medical records and found >97% accuracy. We calculated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) using Poisson regression and assessed the influence of age, sex, ethnicity and index of multiple deprivation (IMD). We used Office for National Statistics population estimates for England as the denominator.ResultsWe identified a total of 5908 cases of kDa in all children under the age of 16 (mean age 3.8, s.d.=3.2, 95% CI: 3.7, 3.9). Incidence in children aged <5 years was 8.9 (95% CI: 8.6, 9.2)/100 000 person-years; in children aged 5-9, 2.4 (95% CI: 2.3, 2.6)/100 000 person-years; and in children aged 10-15, 0.6 (95% CI: 0.6, 0.7). Male : female ratio was 1.5 : 1. Incidence was higher among non-White than White ethnicities [adjusted IRR 2.1 (2.0-2.2) for Asian, 3.0 (2.8-3.3) for Black and 4.5 (4.2-4.8) for other ethnicities]. The incidence increased with socioeconomic deprivation; the adjusted IRR of the least deprived IMD quintile compared with the most deprived quintile was 0.81 (0.77-0.84).ConclusionsIncidence rates of kDa derived from hospital admission data in England were higher than in studies relying on clinician reporting. We confirm previous findings on the influence of sex and ethnicity on kDa incidence and observe that there was a higher incidence of kDa within more deprived socioeconomic groups.
Project description:Records of beach morphologic change and concurrent hydrodynamic forcing are needed to understand how coastlines in different environments change over time. This submission contains data for the period 2006 to 2021, for two contrasting macrotidal environments in southwest England: (i) cross-shore dominated, dissipative, sandy Perranporth Beach, Cornwall; and (ii) longshore-dominated, reflective gravel beaches within Start Bay, Devon. Data comprise monthly to annual beach profile surveys, annual merged topo-bathymetries, in addition to observed and numerically modelled wave and water levels. These data provide a valuable resource for modelling the behaviour of coastal types not covered by other currently available datasets.
Project description:IntroductionPublic policies and legislative approaches are used to address racial health inequities. While most recent studies examine federal and state-level legislative activity, a paucity of analyses characterize policies enacted in a single state and across local jurisdictions. To address this gap, we identify racial health equity policies in the state of Maryland and describe key features and themes.MethodsA legal mapping study and content analysis was conducted. Maryland policies and legislative activity adopted at the state or county level (2012-2021) were identified by systematically searching Westlaw and state and county government legislative databases. Information for each policy was ascertained and analyzed to identify content domains.ResultsWe identified 22 state-level policies and 10 county-level policies and actions that explicitly addressed racial health inequities. Six domains were identified: healthcare and public health cultural competence; disease-specific care and outcomes; access to healthcare services; social determinants of health; collection action and research infrastructure; and structural racism. At the state- and county- level, most policies pertained to the healthcare and public health cultural competence domain. Of Maryland's 24 counties, only 8 (33%) passed health equity policies and implemented equity-specific policy priorities.ConclusionThis study provides a snapshot of the Maryland policy landscape and suggests an increasing prioritization of equity policy at the state and county levels. While policies address issues ranging from cultural competence to structural racism, policy content differed by level of jurisdiction. Future efforts to critically evaluate the impact of specific policies on health inequities are needed.
Project description:Background: Drug-induced coagulopathy (DIC) is a severe adverse reaction and has become a significantly increased clinical problem in children. It is crucial to the detection of the DIC safety signal for drug post-marketing scientific supervision purposes. Therefore, this study aimed to detect potential signals for DIC in children using the routine electronic medical record (EMR) data. Methods: This study extracted EMR data from Beijing Children’s Hospital between 2009 and 2020. A two-stage modeling method was developed to detect the signal of DIC. We calculated the crude incidence by mining cases of coagulopathy to select the potential suspected drugs; then, propensity score-matched retrospective cohorts of specific screened drugs from the first stage were constructed and estimated the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using conditional logistic regression models. The current literature evidence was used to assess the novelty of the signal. Results:In the study, from a total of 340 drugs, 22 drugs were initially screened as potentially inducing coagulopathy. In total, we identified 19 positive DIC associations. Of these, potential DIC risk of omeprazole (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.88–2.65), chlorpheniramine (OR:3.04, 95% CI:2.56–3.60), and salbutamol sulfate (OR:1.36, 95% CI:1.07–1.73) were three new DIC signals in both children and adults. Twelve associations between coagulopathy and drugs, meropenem (OR: 3.38, 95% CI: 2.72–4.20), cefoperazone sulbactam (OR: 2.80, 95% CI: 2.30–3.41), fluconazole (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.71–2.59), voriconazole (OR: 2.82, 95% CI: 2.20–3.61), ambroxol hydrochloride (OR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.74–2.58), furosemide (OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 2.08–2.67), iodixanol (OR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.72–2.85), cefamandole (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.56–2.13), ceftizoxime (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.44–2.63), ceftriaxone (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.44–2.63), latamoxef sodium (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.49–2.07), and sulfamethoxazole (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.01–1.64), were considered as new signals in children. Conclusion: The two-stage algorithm developed in our study to detect safety signals of DIC found nineteen signals of DIC, including twelve new signals in a pediatric population. However, these safety signals of DIC need to be confirmed by further studies based on population study and mechanism research.