Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Trial of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Rapid Test Kit: Prospective Cohort Study.


ABSTRACT:

Background

In response to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, a convenient, rapid, and sensitive diagnostic method for detecting COVID-19 is crucial for patient control and timely treatment.

Objective

This study aimed to validate the detection of SARS-CoV-2 with the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test kit developed based on a novel thermostatic amplification technique called RNase hybridization-assisted amplification.

Methods

From November 25 to December 8, 2022, patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19, close contacts, and health care workers at high risk of exposure were recruited from 3 hospitals and 1 university. Respiratory specimens were collected for testing with the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test kit and compared with reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and a commercial antigen assay kit. Samples from 1447 cases were obtained from 3 "ready-to-test" scenarios in which samples were collected on site and tested immediately, and samples from 503 cases were obtained from a "freeze-thaw test" scenario in which samples were collected, frozen, and thawed for testing.

Results

Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid testing of samples from the "ready-to-test" scenario was found to be accurate (overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.3% and 99.3%, respectively) and diagnostically useful (positive and negative likelihood ratios of 145.45 and 0.02, respectively). Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid testing of samples from the "freeze-thaw test" scenario was also found to be accurate (overall sensitivity and specificity of 71.2% and 98.6%, respectively) and diagnostically useful (positive and negative likelihood ratios of 51.01 and 0.67, respectively). Our findings demonstrated that the time efficiency and accuracy of the results in a "ready-to-test" scenario were better. The time required from sample preparation to the seeing the result of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test was 10 to 38 minutes, which was substantially shorter than that of RT-qPCR (at least 90 minutes). In addition, the diagnostic efficacy of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test was better than that of a commercial antigen assay kit.

Conclusions

The developed RNase hybridization-assisted amplification assay provided rapid, sensitive, and convenient detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection and may be useful for enhanced detection of COVID-19 in homes, high-risk industries, and hospitals.

SUBMITTER: Zhu D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10650960 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Trial of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Rapid Test Kit: Prospective Cohort Study.

Zhu Dandan D   Huang Jing J   Hu Bei B   Cao Donglin D   Chen Dingqiang D   Song Xinqiang X   Chen Jialing J   Zhou Hao H   Cen Aiqun A   Hou Tieying T  

JMIR public health and surveillance 20231114


<h4>Background</h4>In response to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, a convenient, rapid, and sensitive diagnostic method for detecting COVID-19 is crucial for patient control and timely treatment.<h4>Objective</h4>This study aimed to validate the detection of SARS-CoV-2 with the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test kit developed based on a novel thermostatic amplification technique called RNase hybridization-assisted amplification.<h4>Methods</h4>From November 25 to December 8, 2022, patients with suspected or  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10529522 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7349311 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9484135 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8374845 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8913428 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7897404 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8201071 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7348590 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8946922 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8755414 | biostudies-literature