Dataset Information

Comparison of exenatide alone or combined with metformin versus metformin in the treatment of polycystic ovaries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of anovulatory infertility in women of childbearing age. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported that exenatide and metformin are effective in the treatment of PCOS. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of exenatide alone or in combination with metformin versus metformin in patients suffering from PCOS.

Methods

RCTs of exenatide therapy were identified through a search of electronic databases in November 2022 and updated in October 2023. Eligible studies were identified independently by the reviewers. Outcomes were analysed with Revman 5.4.

Results

Nine RCTs among 214 studies on 1059 women with PCOS were included in the analysis, and among the nine RCTs, eight studies compared exenatide with metformin. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that exenatide was more effective than metformin in terms of pregnancy rate (RR 1.85 [95% CI 1.19,2.86] P = 0.006), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) (MD 5 [95% CI 3.82,6.18] P < 0.001), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (MD 0.82 [95% 0.41,1.24] P < 0.001). The reductions in total testosterone (TT) (SMD -0.43 [95% CI -0.84, -0.03] P = 0.04) was more significant after treatment with exenatide than after treatment with metformin. In terms of safety, exenatide had a lower diarrhea rate (RR 0.11 [95% CI 0.01, 0.84]) than metformin. In the other three studies, exenatide plus metformin was compared with metformin. Exenatide combined with metformin was more effective in improving SHBG (MD 10.38[95%CI 6.7,14.06] P < 0.001), Matsuda index (MD 0.21[95%CI 0.05,0.37]) and reducing free androgen index (FAI) (MD -3.34 [-4.84, -1.83] P < 0.001), Weight (MD -2.32 [95%CI -3.89, -0.66]) and WC (MD-5.61[95%CI -8.4, -2.82] P < 0.001). The incidence of side effects between exenatide plus metformin and metformin was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Exenatide alone or in combination with metformin is more effective than metformin for women with PCOS. Considering the evidence on effectiveness and safety, exenatide alone or in combination with metformin may be a better treatment approach than metformin for women with PCOS.

Trial registration

INPLASY https://inplasy.com/inplasy-protocols/ ID: 10.37766/inplasy2022.11.0055.

SUBMITTER: Hu Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10652559 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of exenatide alone or combined with metformin versus metformin in the treatment of polycystic ovaries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hu Yan Y Song Xiangxin X Hamiti Shaila S Ma Yanyong Y Yusufu Mainu M Wang Xing X Zhang Kaidi K Guo Yanying Y

BMC endocrine disorders 20231116 1

<h4>Background</h4>Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of anovulatory infertility in women of childbearing age. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported that exenatide and metformin are effective in the treatment of PCOS. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of exenatide alone or in combination with metformin versus metformin in patients suffering from PCOS.<h4>Methods</h4>RCTs of exenatide therapy were identified through a search ...[more]

PMID: 37974132

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundObesity and insulin resistance (IR) are common features of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Metformin (MET) increases insulin sensitivity, but it is associated with unsatisfactory weight loss. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide has been shown to reduce weight and IR in patients with diabetes. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic effects of exenatide once-weekly (QW) combined with MET on body weight, as well as metabolic and endocrinological parameters in overweight/obese women with PCOS.MethodsFifty overweight/obese women with PCOS diagnosed via the Rotterdam criteria were randomized to one of two treatment groups: MET (500 mg three times a day [TID]) or combination treatment (COM) (MET 500 mg TID, exenatide 2 mg QW) for 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were anthropometric changes associated with obesity, and the secondary outcomes included changes in reproductive hormone levels, glucose and lipid metabolism, and C-reactive protein.ResultsForty (80%) patients completed the study. COM therapy was superior to MET monotherapy in reducing weight (P = 0.045), body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.041), and waist circumference (P = 0.023). Patients in the COM group on an average lost 3.8 ± 2.4 kg compared with 2.1 ± 3.0 kg in the MET group. In the COM group, BMI and waist circumference decreased by 1.4 ± 0.87 kg/m2 and 4.63 ± 4.42 cm compared with 0.77 ± 1.17 kg/m2 and 1.72 ± 3.07 cm in the MET group, respectively. Moreover, levels of fasting glucose, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 2-h glucose, and OGTT 2-h insulin were significantly lower with COM therapy than with MET (P < 0.050). Mild and moderate gastrointestinal reactions were the most common adverse events in both groups.ConclusionsCOM therapy was more effective than MET alone in reducing body weight, BMI, and waist circumference, and improving insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese women with PCOS, with acceptable short-term side effects.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04029272. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04029272.

Project description:BackgroundShuxuening injection (SXN) is a traditional Chinese medicine used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Whether it can provide better outcomes when combined with edaravone injection (ERI) for the treatment of acute cerebral infarction is not well determined. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of ERI combined with SXN versus that of ERI alone in patients with acute cerebral infarction.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang electronic databases were searched up to July 2022. Randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of efficacy rate, neurologic impairment, inflammatory factors, and hemorheology were included. Odds ratio or standard mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to present the overall estimates. The quality of the included trials was evaluated by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses.ResultsSeventeen randomized controlled trials were included consisting of 1607 patients. Compared to ERI alone, treatment with ERI plus SXN had a greater effective rate than ER alone (odds ratio = 3.94; 95% CI: 2.85, 5.44; I2 = 0%, P < .00001), a lower National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (SMD= -1.39; 95% CI: -1.73, -1.05; I2 = 71%, P < .00001), lower neural function defect score (SMD= -0.75; 95% CI: -1.06,-0.43; I2 = 67%, P < .00001), and lower level of neuron-specific enolase (SMD= -2.10; 95% CI: -2.85, -1.35; I2 = 85%, P < .00001). ERI plus SXN treatment provided significant improvements in whole blood high shear viscosity (SMD = -0.87; 95% CI: -1.17, -0.57; I2 = 0%, P < .00001), and whole blood low shear viscosity (SMD = -1.50; 95% CI: -1.65, -1.36; I2 = 0%, P < .00001) compared to ERI alone.ConclusionERI plus SXN showed better efficacy than ERI alone for patients with acute cerebral infarction. Our study provides evidence supporting the application of ERI plus SXN for acute cerebral infarction.

Project description:This analysis assessed whether responses with exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin (n = 231), exenatide once weekly alone (n = 230), or dapagliflozin alone (n = 233) differed in key patient subpopulations of the DURATION-8 trial. Potential treatment-by-subgroup interactions for changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight after 28 weeks were evaluated among subgroups determined by baseline HbA1c, age, sex, body mass index, type 2 diabetes duration, race, ethnicity and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin reduced HbA1c and body weight across all subgroups: least-squares mean reductions ranged from -8.4 to -26.1 mmol/mol (-0.77% to -2.39%) for HbA1c and from -2.07 to -4.55 kg for body weight. Potential treatment-by-subgroup interactions (P < .10) were found for HbA1c change by age (P = .016) and eGFR (P = .097). Age subgroup analysis findings were not consistent with expected mechanistic effects, with the small number of patients aged ≥65 years (n = 74 vs n = 499 for patients aged <65 years) limiting the interpretability of the interaction term. In the exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin and dapagliflozin groups, but not the exenatide once weekly group, HbA1c reductions were greater among patients with eGFR ≥90 vs ≥60 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (least-squares mean reductions of -23.6 vs -19.0 mmol/mol [-2.16% vs -1.74%], -17.3 vs -12.0 mmol/mol [-1.58% vs -1.10%], and -17.7 vs -16.9 mmol/mol [-1.62% vs -1.55%] for the respective treatments); this was consistent with the mechanism of action of dapagliflozin. A potential treatment-by-subgroup interaction was observed for change in body weight by sex (P = .099), with greater weight loss for women vs men across all treatments (range -2.56 to -3.98 kg vs -0.56 to -2.99 kg). In conclusion, treatment with exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin reduced HbA1c and body weight across all patient subgroups and was more effective than exenatide once weekly or dapagliflozin alone in all adequately sized subgroups.

Dataset Information

Comparison of exenatide alone or combined with metformin versus metformin in the treatment of polycystic ovaries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Publications

Comparison of exenatide alone or combined with metformin versus metformin in the treatment of polycystic ovaries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets