Meta-analysis of published excess relative risk estimates.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: A meta-analytic summary effect estimate often is calculated as an inverse-variance-weighted average of study-specific estimates of association. The variances of published estimates of association often are derived from their associated confidence intervals under assumptions typical of Wald-type statistics, such as normality of the parameter. However, in some research areas, such as radiation epidemiology, epidemiological results typically are obtained by fitting linear relative risk models, and associated likelihood-based confidence intervals are often asymmetric; consequently, reasonable estimates of variances associated with study-specific estimates of association may be difficult to infer from the standard approach based on the assumption of a Wald-type interval. Here, a novel method is
SUBMITTER: Richardson DB
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10659128 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA