A different approach to teaching pre-clerkship students physical diagnosis: standardized patient instructor-senior medical student teaching teams.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Faculty have traditionally taught the physical examination (PE) to novice medical students (pre-clerkship students.), despite recruiting and cost issues and problems standardizing their approach.Activity
We present a model using standardized patient instructor (SPI)-fourth year medical student (MS4) teams to teach PE to pre-clerkship students, leveraging the benefits of co-teaching and peer-assisted learning.Results
Surveys of pre-clerkship students, MS4s and SPIs indicate positive perceptions of the program, including MS4s reporting significant growth in their professional identities as educators. Pre-clerkship students' performance on the spring clinical skills exams was equivalent to or better than their peer performance pre-program implementation.Implications
SPI-MS4 teams can effectively teach novice students the mechanics and clinical context of the beginners' physical exam.
SUBMITTER: Spelde A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10664546 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
A different approach to teaching pre-clerkship students physical diagnosis: standardized patient instructor-senior medical student teaching teams.
Spelde Audrey A Blatt Benjamin B Lewis Karen L KL Owens Jennifer L JL Greenberg Larrie L
BMC medical education 20231121 1
<h4>Background</h4>Faculty have traditionally taught the physical examination (PE) to novice medical students (pre-clerkship students.), despite recruiting and cost issues and problems standardizing their approach.<h4>Activity</h4>We present a model using standardized patient instructor (SPI)-fourth year medical student (MS4) teams to teach PE to pre-clerkship students, leveraging the benefits of co-teaching and peer-assisted learning.<h4>Results</h4>Surveys of pre-clerkship students, MS4s and S ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundWith the elimination in 2021 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Skills test, it is incumbent upon U.S. medical schools to develop local validated assessments of clinical reasoning. While much attention has been paid to summative exams for graduating students, formative exams for pre-clerkship students have not been well studied.MethodsWe applied the University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine (UIC-COM) Patient Note (PN) Scoring Rubric to templated PNs written by 103 pre-clerkship students for two cases in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) at the Yale School of Medicine. The rubric consists of four section scores (Documentation, Differential Diagnosis, Justification, and Workup, each scored 1 to 4) and a composite score (scaled 23 to 100). We calculated item discrimination for each section score and Cronbach's alpha for each case. We surveyed students about their experience writing the templated PN.ResultsMean Documentation, Differential Diagnosis, Justification, Workup, and composite scores for case A were 2.16, 1.80, 1.65, 2.29, and 47.67, respectively. For case B, the scores were 2.13, 1.21, 1.60, 1.67, and 40.54, respectively. Item discrimination ranged from 0.41 to 0.80. Cronbach's alpha for cases A and B was 0.48 and 0.25, respectively. A majority of the students felt that the exercise was useful and appropriate to their level of training.ConclusionsDespite performing poorly, pre-clerkship students found the note-writing task beneficial. Reliability of the scoring rubric was suboptimal, and modifications are needed to make this exercise a suitable measure of clinical reasoning.
| S-EPMC10339528 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionData from the Association of American Medical Colleges' Medical School Graduation Questionnaire show persistent trends of medical student mistreatment nationwide. To reduce the barriers and increase actionable reporting of mistreatment, we integrated peer-facilitated learning environment sessions led by a group of trained third- and fourth-year medical students in all core clinical clerkships.MethodsDuring the 2018-2019 academic year, third-year medical students were recruited, oriented, and trained to act as facilitators of sessions on mistreatment. The sessions occurred once every clerkship block, using a standardized session introduction and guide. After a 6-month pilot, new medical students were recruited and worked as scribe/facilitator pairs, receiving an additional 1.5-hour training midyear, which was evaluated with a postworkshop survey.ResultsThirty-eight students implemented 43 peer-facilitated sessions and completed deidentified minutes of each session, which were shared with clerkship directors and the Medical Education Office for review. Survey data from midyear facilitator training indicated that facilitators highly agreed peer-led sessions were an important avenue for students to process experiences of mistreatment (3.9 out of 4), understood barriers to reporting (3.8 out of 4) and definitions of mistreatment (3.6 out of 4), and felt confident to facilitate these sessions (3.6 out of 4).DiscussionPeer-facilitated sessions offer a method to learn more about student experiences with mistreatment in real time and create a new avenue for communication between faculty and students. Assembling a stable core team of third- and fourth-year students trained in facilitation skills ensures the sustainability and relevance of the program.
| S-EPMC8473588 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionMedical students often lack training in advanced communication skills encompassing emotionally fraught situations and those in which an intense emotional response is expected. Such skills are required for clinical situations encountered during residency. We created and evaluated an advanced communication skills workshop (ACSW) using standardized patients for senior medical students. The workshop emphasized communication skills for four scenarios-strong emotion, goals of care, medical error, and palliative care assessment-and utilized formative peer assessment and feedback.MethodsWe created the four ACSW cases with case-specific communication behavior checklists and a common modified Master Interview Rating Scale in a Capstone Course for senior medical students. In groups of three, students rotated through three of four stations. Each student conducted one of the interviews while the other two completed the checklists and provided verbal feedback. We performed one-way analyses of variance on Likert responses and content analysis on open responses on a post-ACSW survey.ResultsNinety-one students completed the ACSW and survey. Students assigned high value to all four ACSW student roles: interviewer, observer, feedback recipient, and feedback provider. Students rated the experience above average to excellent on nearly all survey items. Open-response themes included "liked the opportunity to give or receive peer feedback" (46%) and "found the checklists helpful" (45%).DiscussionFeasible and well received by senior medical students, our ACSW offers an opportunity to practice and observe advanced communication skills and peer feedback. A peer-assisted, formative learning model, the ACSW efficiently addresses a key aspect of residency preparation.
| S-EPMC8155077 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionDespite many patients wanting physicians to inquire about their religious/spiritual beliefs, most physicians do not make such inquiries. Among physicians who do, surgeons are less likely than family and general practitioners and psychiatrists to do so.MethodsTo address this gap, we developed a 60-minute curriculum that follows the Kolb cycle of experiential learning for third-year medical students on their surgery/anesthesiology clerkship. The session includes definitions of religion/spirituality, an overview of the literature on spirituality in surgery, a review of the FICA Spiritual History Tool, discussion of the role of the chaplain and the process of initiating a chaplain consult, and three cases regarding the spiritual needs of surgical patients.ResultsIn total, 165 students participated in 10 sessions over 13 months. Of these, 120 students (73%) provided short-term feedback. Overall, 82% rated the session above average or excellent, and 72% stated the session was very relevant to patient care. To improve the session, students recommended assigning key readings, discussing more cases, role-playing various scenarios, inviting patients to speak, practicing mock interviews, and allowing for more self-reflection and discussion. Long-term feedback was provided by 105 students (64%) and indicated that the spirituality session impacted their attitudes about the role of religion/spirituality in medicine and their behaviors with patients.DiscussionWe have designed a successful session on spirituality for third-year students on their surgery/anesthesiology clerkship. Students reported it to be a positive addition to the curriculum. The session can be modified for other surgical subspecialties and specialties outside of surgery.
| S-EPMC6354800 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionMost health care providers will be involved in a medical error during their careers. It is critical that future physicians receive formal training on error disclosure.MethodsWe designed a formative skills-based objective standardized clinical exam (OSCE) for fourth-year medical students to assess competence in disclosing an error during a required entrustable professional activity. Faculty observed the encounter and completed a checklist evaluating students' performance in communication skills and content knowledge. Students received immediate formative feedback. They then participated in a facilitated case-based experience, discussed the critical elements of disclosure, utilized role-play to reinforce skills, and reflected on self-care practices. Finally, students completed a survey evaluating their perception of the OSCE's impact on their disclosure knowledge, skills, and attitudes.ResultsNinety-two students participated in the OSCE. Of those, 67 (73%) completed a retrospective pre/post survey assessing their disclosure knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Forty-one (62%) did not identify the error. Students who identified the error (26, 39%) were more likely to use the two-patient identifier than students who did not identify the error, χ2(1) = 13.3, p < .001. Self-reported comfort and confidence in disclosure improved, as did self-care practices (ps ≤ .005).DiscussionStudents agreed that health care providers should disclose an error and know how to do so. Student self-reported comfort in disclosure and knowledge of how to disclose and how to report an error all improved following the OSCE and structured debrief. The OSCE and case-based experience can be adapted for implementation in curricula about error disclosure.
| S-EPMC10876916 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPeer-assisted study sessions (P.A.S.S.) are medical student-facilitated small-group sessions that aim to improve students' knowledge and performance in preclinical courses. Peer teaching has been shown to have a positive impact on academic performance of both learners and peer teachers. For peer teaching to be more effective, there is a need for training of peer teachers. We developed a facilitator training workshop to help to improve medical students' confidence in serving as P.A.S.S. facilitators.MethodsParticipants were first-year medical students who were approved to become P.A.S.S. facilitators. We recruited facilitators to attend a training workshop and provided them with a training manual to use during the training session and as a resource after the session. We recruited five standardized students to participate in an objective standardized teaching exercise (OSTE). We asked facilitators to complete pre/post surveys before and after the workshop to indicate their level of confidence in facilitating the sessions and provide feedback on the workshop.ResultsNine P.A.S.S. facilitators participated in the training session. Analysis of pre- and postworkshop survey data showed a statistically significant increase in student confidence (p ≤ .02).DiscussionDeveloping and implementing a formalized P.A.S.S. facilitator training manual and workshop with an OSTE helped improve students' confidence in facilitating an organized, effective, and interactive peer teaching session. Students' positive feedback on the OSTE suggests that OSTEs can be useful tools to help peer teachers learn skills to cope with challenging situations with students.
| S-EPMC7328851 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMedical schools were compelled to abruptly transition pre-clerkship curricula to remote learning formats due to the emergence of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We evaluated student perceptions of remote learning, exam performance, and utilization of third-party learning resources to assess the implementation of a newly developed pandemic-appropriate physiology curriculum.MethodsThis was an observational study based on a survey conducted in the Spring of 2021 at the University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine (UCISOM). This study aimed to assess first (MS1) and second year (MS2) medical students' perceptions of satisfaction, support, academic performance, and connectedness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The MS1 class began medical school during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the MS2 class did so prior to the start of the pandemic. A survey instrument was developed and validated to identify the impact remote learning had on student self-perceptions of the Medical Physiology and Pathophysiology course. Surveys were distributed to all students and responses were collected on a voluntary basis. Exam scores on a customized National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) physiology shelf exam were also compared to objectively identify how the remote curriculum during the pandemic impacted academic performance.ResultsOf 204 students enrolled, 74 responses were analyzed, with 42 MS1 (40% of MS1s) and 32 MS2 (31% of MS2s) responses. Overall, MS1s and MS2s were satisfied with the curriculum they received (95 and 97% respectively) and the school's support of their concerns (86 and 100% respectively). Notably, only 50% of MS1s felt connected to their peers, compared to 94% of MS2s. Lecture attendance and self-perception of their academic performance were similar between both classes. Interestingly, the intra-pandemic class's NBME exam average in 2020 (60.2% ± 8.9, n = 104) was significantly higher than the pre-pandemic class average in 2019 (56.8% ± 11.3, n = 100). Both classes primarily used course materials over third-party learning resources. An additional set of survey questions distributed only to the MS1 class found that the majority of MS1s reported minimal barriers with regards to accessibility, including internet connectivity, study-conducive environments, and balancing family commitments. Overall, pre-clerkship medical students had positive perceptions of the newly developed pandemic-appropriate physiology curriculum.ConclusionsChanges to the pre-clerkship physiology curriculum during the COVID-19 pandemic were met with overall satisfaction from the students and an increase in NBME scores. More attention to student connectedness is needed to improve how remote learning can be best optimized into future curricula development.
| S-EPMC9716147 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionObjective standardized teaching exercises (OSTEs) are widely used to develop professional competencies, especially in the health care professions. An OSTE involves exposing different providers to the same, time-limited scenario that is concurrently observed and/or recorded for either formative or summative evaluation. As there are limited resources available for creating a resident-specific OSTE, especially those applicable to family and community medicine residents, we created and evaluated a resident OSTE (R-OSTE) for second- and third-year family and community medicine residents.MethodsThis R-OSTE involved two cases. The first featured Taylor, a third-year medical student resistant to feedback. The second featured Kris, a first-year resident nervous about approaching the attending on duty. Our R-OSTE had residents teaching interpersonal skills to trained actors in a standardized learner role.ResultsResidents in the teaching role were formatively evaluated by peer observers (fellow residents) and standardized learners on interpersonal domains such as communication and professionalism. Learners gave residents an average performance rating of 4.9 on a 1 to 6 scale with 1 = Very Poor and 6 = Excellent. Residents also evaluated the OSTE itself, rating their experience on multiple teaching-related statements. Eighty-six percent of residents agreed this exercise was an appropriate development activity for family medicine residents. Overall, our R-OSTE was rated highly for relevance to teaching by the residents.DiscussionThe residents were rated highly by both peer observers and standardized learners. However, there was little variability in peer observer scores, indicating the need for an alternative method of measurement.
| S-EPMC6338149 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeVirtual instruction became the primary educational delivery method for pre-clerkship medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of a virtual and blended pre-clerkship curriculum and to assess its impact on students.MethodsWe surveyed 223 1st- and 2nd-year medical students (MS1s and MS2s) enrolled at the Paul L Foster School of Medicine. We analyzed student satisfaction with their courses, along with summative exam scores, compared to previous academic years.ResultsThe survey was completed by 125 of 223 students (56%). Most students changed their study methods (78%), experienced technical issues (85%), and had difficulty communicating with faculty (62%). MS1s were significantly more likely than MS2s to report difficulty in adjusting to virtual instruction (p = 0.037) and a negative impact on their learning skills (p = 0.005) and academic performance (p = 0.003). Students reported the virtual environment negatively affected their social skills (77%), connectedness to peers (89%), and professional development (62%). MS1s were more likely than MS2s to perceive a negative effect on their sense of wellness (p = 0.002). The overall satisfaction with the courses was similar to previous academic years. Student performance in the summative examination of the first virtually delivered unit was lower (p = 0.007) than the previous year's cohorts.ConclusionThe difference in MS1s and MS2s perceptions of virtual and blended instruction highlights the importance of face-to-face learning during the first year. Benefits and drawbacks were identified which may help inform educators when designing future learning models.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01723-6.
| S-EPMC9838249 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionTransgender patients experience poor health outcomes and often avoid seeking medical care because of negative encounters with providers. Despite growing awareness of the health disparities transgender patients face, there is very little curricular time in medical schools to improve medical students' knowledge and skills for caring for transgender patients. This standardized patient (SP) case was developed for use in a communication challenges workshop for advanced clerkship students in order to address working with transgender patients.MethodsThis formative SP encounter takes place in a classroom as part of a half-day workshop on communication challenges with patients. We developed the case to focus specifically on skills related to obtaining patients' preferred names and pronouns, as well as taking an appropriate patient history. Materials for SP recruitment, SP training, and case implementation are included within this publication.ResultsIn preliminary uses of the case, 80% of students (N = 64) agreed or strongly agreed that it had increased their skills for working with transgender patients. Observational data from the debrief discussions also revealed that medical students perceived gaps in their medical training regarding LGBT health and expressed interest in their program incorporating more information on transgender health.DiscussionThis case adds to a growing number of curricular interventions to address medical students' knowledge and skills with regard to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) patients and, as a result, aims to address health disparities in LGBT patient populations.
| S-EPMC6440493 | biostudies-literature