Two Statistics for Measuring the Score Comparability of Computerized Adaptive Tests.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: This study introduces two new statistics for measuring the score comparability of computerized adaptive tests (CATs) based on comparing conditional standard errors of measurement (CSEMs) for examinees that achieved the same scale scores. One statistic is designed to evaluate score comparability of alternate CAT forms for individual scale scores, while the other statistic is designed to evaluate the overall score comparability of alternate CAT forms. The effectiveness of the new statistics is illustrated using data from grade 3 through 8 reading and math CATs. Results suggest that both CATs demonstrated reasonably high levels of score comparability, that score comparability was less at very high or low scores where few students score, and that using random samples with fewer students per gr
SUBMITTER: Wyse AE
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10664745 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA