Generically partisan: Polarization in political communication.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: American political parties continue to grow more polarized, but the extent of ideological polarization among the public is much less than the extent of perceived polarization (what the ideological gap is believed to be). Perceived polarization is concerning because of its link to interparty hostility, but it remains unclear what drives this phenomenon. We propose that a tendency for individuals to form broad generalizations about groups on the basis of inconsistent evidence may be partly responsible. We study this tendency by measuring the interpretation, endorsement, and recall of category-referring statements, also known as generics (e.g., "Democrats favor affirmative action"). In study 1 (n = 417), perceived polarization was substantially greater than actual polarization. Further
SUBMITTER: Novoa G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10666007 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA