Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

How does PLoS medicine manage competing interests?

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER:

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1069676 | biostudies-literature | 2005 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Making progress with competing interests.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC1124846 | biostudies-literature

PLOS Medicine 2015 Reviewer Thank You

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC4764359 | biostudies-literature

PLOS Medicine 2014 Reviewer Thank You

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC4344346 | biostudies-literature

Competing interests: digital health and indigenous data sovereignty.

Project description:Digital health is increasingly promoting open health data. Although this open approach promises a number of benefits, it also leads to tensions with Indigenous data sovereignty movements led by Indigenous peoples around the world who are asserting control over the use of health data as a part of self-determination. Digital health has a role in improving access to services and delivering improved health outcomes for Indigenous communities. However, we argue that in order to be effective and ethical, it is essential that the field engages more with Indigenous peoples´ rights and interests. We discuss challenges and possible improvements for data acquisition, management, analysis, and integration as they pertain to the health of Indigenous communities around the world.

| S-EPMC11224364 | biostudies-literature

Declaring financial competing interests: survey of five general medical journals.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC35347 | biostudies-literature

Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICMJE journals.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC2764746 | biostudies-literature

PLOS Medicine 2017 Reviewer and Editorial Board Thank You

Project description:PLOS and the PLOS Medicine team would like to express our appreciation to the academic editors, guest editors, and reviewers who contributed to the peer-review process in 2017.

| S-EPMC5854231 | biostudies-literature

PLOS Medicine 2016 Reviewer and Editorial Board Thank You

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5358730 | biostudies-literature

The Neglected Diseases Section in PLoS Medicine: Moving Beyond Tropical Infections

Project description:The Neglected Diseases section will no longer focus on chronic tropical infections, but on other neglected health problems that have a major global burden.

| S-EPMC2253615 | biostudies-literature

Responsibilities and Interests of Pediatricians Practicing Hospital Medicine in the United States.

Project description:Background and objectivesIn 2016, the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) approved pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) as the newest pediatric subspecialty. To characterize development of the field, this article aims to: (1) describe the responsibilities and practice settings of US pediatricians self-identifying as hospitalists; and (2) determine how exclusive PHM practice, compared with PHM practice in combination with general or subspecialty care, was associated with professional development interests.MethodsPediatricians enrolling in the 2017-2018 American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) Maintenance of Certification program were offered a voluntary survey about their responsibilities, interests, and practice settings. Logistic regression was employed to characterize associations between exclusive PHM practice and: (1) interest in quality improvement (QI) leadership; (2) intention to take the PHM certifying exam; (3) satisfaction with allocation of professional time; and (4) intention to maintain more than one ABP certification.ResultsThe survey response rate was 70.0%; 1662 (13.1%) self-reported PHM practice. Four-hundred ninety-one (29.5%) practiced PHM exclusively, 518 (31.1%) practiced PHM and general pediatrics, and 653 (39.3%) practiced PHM and one or more subspecialties. Respondents reporting exclusive PHM practice were significantly more likely to report interest in QI leadership or consultation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.79), PHM exam certification (adjusted OR, 7.10; 95% CI, 5.45-9.25), and maintenance of more than one ABP certification (adjusted OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.89-3.68).ConclusionsHospitalists reported diverse clinical and nonclinical responsibilities. Those practicing PHM exclusively expressed high levels of interest in board certification and QI leadership. Ongoing monitoring of PHM responsibilities and practice settings will be important to support the professional development of the PHM workforce.

| S-EPMC8626056 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data