Aligning climate scenarios to emissions inventories shifts global benchmarks.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Taking stock of global progress towards achieving the Paris Agreement requires consistently measuring aggregate national actions and pledges against modelled mitigation pathways1. However, national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGIs) and scientific assessments of anthropogenic emissions follow different accounting conventions for land-based carbon fluxes resulting in a large difference in the present emission estimates2,3, a gap that will evolve over time. Using state-of-the-art methodologies4 and a land carbon-cycle emulator5, we align the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)-assessed mitigation pathways with the NGHGIs to make a comparison. We find that the key global mitigation benchmarks become harder to achieve when calculated us
SUBMITTER: Gidden MJ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10700135 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA