Dataset Information

The Psychological, Social and Behavioral Impact of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy: An Analysis from the ALBATROS Data.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Retinal diseases such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), or branch/central retinal vein occlusion (B/CRVO) have significant implications for patients' social and psychological well-being. The ALBATROS study aimed to assess the care situation of patients who received anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) treatment. To gain a comprehensive understanding of patients' backgrounds and attitudes, we developed an exploratory, structured questionnaire, the Basic Care and Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (BPZ-9).

Methods

The data collection took place at the beginning and after twelve months of anti-VEGF therapy. The BPZ-9 questionnaire comprises nine questions to evaluate patients' psychological and social situation and satisfaction with treatment.

Results

Data were collected from 1478 nAMD (mean 78 years), 445 DME (67 years), 233 BRVO (70 years), and 144 CRVO (71 years) patients at 102 study centers throughout Germany. One in four patients had difficulties walking, and one in five needed an accompanying person for treatment. Anxiety about losing vision was present in three out of four patients at the beginning, and it slightly decreased to two out of three patients over the 12-month treatment period. The distress of having a retinal disease was generally higher than the distress related to the treatment. Most patients reported high treatment satisfaction (73%) and felt well-informed (81%).

Conclusions

There is a relevant social and psychological impact related to anti-VEGF treatment. The patients' perception, attitudes, and commitment need further investigation.

SUBMITTER: Wolfram C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10707522 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Psychological, Social and Behavioral Impact of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy: An Analysis from the ALBATROS Data.

Wolfram Christian C Pfeiffer Norbert N Hudde Tobias T Klatt Alexander A Schnegelsberg Birthe B Ross Mike M Ziemssen Focke F Schuster Alexander K AK

Journal of clinical medicine 20231130 23

<h4>Background</h4>Retinal diseases such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), or branch/central retinal vein occlusion (B/CRVO) have significant implications for patients' social and psychological well-being. The ALBATROS study aimed to assess the care situation of patients who received anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) treatment. To gain a comprehensive understanding of patients' backgrounds and attitudes, we developed an exploratory ...[more]

PMID: 38068487

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIntravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections play a key role in treating a range of macular diseases. The effectiveness of these therapies is dependent on patients' adherence (the extent to which a patient takes their medicines as per agreed recommendations from the healthcare provider) and persistence (continuation of the treatment for the prescribed duration) to their prescribed treatment regimens. The aim of this systematic review was to demonstrate the need for further investigation into the prevalence of, and factors contributing to, patient-led non-adherence and non-persistence, thus facilitating improved clinical outcomes.MethodsSystematic searches were conducted in Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. Studies in English conducted before February 2023 that reported the level of, and/or barriers to, non-adherence or non-persistence to intravitreal anti-VEGF ocular disease therapy were included. Duplicate papers, literature reviews, expert opinion articles, case studies, and case series were excluded following screening by two independent authors.ResultsData from a total of 409,215 patients across 52 studies were analysed. Treatment regimens included pro re nata, monthly and treat-and-extend protocols; study durations ranged from 4 months to 8 years. Of the 52 studies, 22 included a breakdown of reasons for patient non-adherence/non-persistence. Patient-led non-adherence varied between 17.5 and 35.0% depending on the definition used. Overall pooled prevalence of patient-led treatment non-persistence was 30.0% (P = 0.000). Reasons for non-adherence/non-persistence included dissatisfaction with treatment results (29.9%), financial burden (19%), older age/comorbidities (15.5%), difficulty booking appointments (8.5%), travel distance/social isolation (7.9%), lack of time (5.8%), satisfaction with the perceived improvement in their condition (4.4%), fear of injection (4.0%), loss of motivation (4.0%), apathy towards eyesight (2.5%), dissatisfaction with facilities 2.3%, and discomfort/pain (0.3%). Three studies found non-adherence rates between 51.6 and 68.8% during the COVID-19 pandemic, in part due to fear of exposure to COVID-19 and difficulties travelling during lockdown.DiscussionResults suggest high levels of patient-led non-adherence/non-persistence to anti-VEGF therapy, mostly due to dissatisfaction with treatment results, a combination of comorbidities, loss of motivation and the burden of travel. This study provides key information on prevalence and factors contributing to non-adherence/non-persistence in anti-VEGF treatment for macular diseases, aiding identification of at-risk individuals to improve real-world visual outcomes. Improvements in the literature can be achieved by establishing uniform definitions and standard timescales for what constitutes non-adherence/non-persistence.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42020216205.

Project description:PurposeIntravitreal (IVT) injections of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab are commonly prescribed to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Studies comparing inflammation rates in large populations of patients receiving these agents and the treatment of ocular inflammation post-IVT anti-VEGF injections are scarce. In this study, we compared rates of endophthalmitis claims (sterile and infectious) following IVT anti-VEGF injections to determine the risk factors associated with developing endophthalmitis, and examined the claims for subsequent treatment.Patients and methodsThis retrospective cohort study of USA claims data examined the risk of developing endophthalmitis following IVT injection of aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab in patients with nAMD between 11/18/2011 and 5/31/2013. The primary study outcome was occurrence of endophthalmitis within 30 days of a claim for an IVT anti-VEGF injection. Endophthalmitis rates were calculated separately for aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab, followed by pairwise comparisons of endophthalmitis frequencies among the 3 treatments.ResultsThis analysis included 818,558 injections from 156,594 patients with nAMD. The rates (% [n/N]) of endophthalmitis following aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab IVT injections were 0.100% (136/135,973), 0.056% (268/481,572), and 0.047% (94/201,013), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, aflibercept was associated with a significantly higher risk of endophthalmitis vs ranibizumab (adjusted odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI: 1.68-2.85; P<0.0001). The risk of endophthalmitis was similar for bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Within 14 days after endophthalmitis, 38.6% of cases received injectable antibiotics, 15.3% received injectable steroids, and 30.3% underwent vitrectomy.ConclusionThe rate of endophthalmitis was very low, but higher following IVT injection with aflibercept compared with both bevacizumab and ranibizumab in patients with nAMD.

Dataset Information

The Psychological, Social and Behavioral Impact of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy: An Analysis from the ALBATROS Data.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The Psychological, Social and Behavioral Impact of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy: An Analysis from the ALBATROS Data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets