Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Minimally Invasive Surgical Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Observational Single-Center Study in Japan.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MICS-AVR) versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) in Asian patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, observational, single-center study in Japan, including cases of MICS-AVR (n = 202) and TF-TAVR (n = 248) between 2014 and 2021. In a total of 450 cases, propensity score matching was performed at a ratio of 1:1, resulting in 96 pairs. Furthermore, we performed competing-risk regression and mediation analyses to determine the treatment effect on outcomes of interests, considering death as a competing risk, and to evaluate the mediation effect of paravalvular leak (PVL) severity.

Results

There were similar incidences of all-cause death, cardiac death, stroke and cerebral hemorrhage, and aortic valve reintervention between the 2 groups. However, the TF-TAVR cohort had a longer hospital length of stay and higher rates of significant PVL compared with the MICS-AVR cohort. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analyses revealed that heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.129, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.038 to 0.445, p = 0.001) and permanent pacemaker implantation (HR = 0.050, 95% CI: 0.006 to 0.409, p = 0.005) favored MICS-AVR. Competing-risk regression analyses confirmed similar findings. All outcomes were unrelated to PVL severity.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first comparative study of clinical outcomes in Asian patients undergoing MICS-AVR versus TF-TAVR, revealing that MICS-AVR could be a feasible and efficient alternative to TF-TAVR. Future larger-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the present results.

SUBMITTER: Yamamoto H 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10714700 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Minimally Invasive Surgical Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Observational Single-Center Study in Japan.

Yamamoto Hiroyuki H   Nakayama Taisuke T   Ishii Naoki N   Nakamura Yoshitsugu Y  

Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.) 20231107 6


<h4>Objective</h4>This study aimed to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MICS-AVR) versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) in Asian patients.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective, observational, single-center study in Japan, including cases of MICS-AVR (<i>n</i> = 202) and TF-TAVR (<i>n</i> = 248) between 2014 and 2021. In a total of 450 cases, propensity score matching was performed at a ratio of 1:1, resulting in 96 pairs. F  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9510825 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8501224 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10628418 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8183801 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8858441 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6583695 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3014148 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5465124 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7907039 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8470564 | biostudies-literature