A stag beetle knife can achieve stabler and safer endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER:
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10715911 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BACKGROUND Recently, a stag beetle (SB) knife was introduced to reduce the difficulty of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the SB knife. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 71 patients undergoing POEM with the SB knife for esophageal achalasia were included. We used esophagography, manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and Eckardt score to assess the utility and safety. RESULTS All cases were completed for POEM. The incidence of adverse events during the operation were 2.8%; however, all cases were treated conservatively. There was a vast improvement in clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings. The average Eckardt score was 6.9 before and 0.6 at 1 year after POEM (p<0.05). The average lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure before and 6 months after POEM were 44.34±14.83 mmHg and 19.14±6.74 mmHg (p<0.05), respectively. The average LES relaxation pressure before and 6 months after POEM was 12.11±5.02 mmHg and 3.22±2.29 mmHg (p<0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS POEM with the SB Knife is technically efficient and safe in treating achalasia and is associated with favorable short-term outcomes.
| S-EPMC6528546 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5992263 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5990489 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7729848 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Video Video 1 Endoscopic submucosal dissection using a multifunctional endoscopic submucosal dissection knife.
| S-EPMC10020168 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Video 1.
| S-EPMC8351124 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6620361 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Video 1Treatment of Bouveret syndrome with stone fragmentation using an endoscopic submucosal dissection knife. A 61-year-old man with a 3-decade history of recurrent cholecystitis presented to the community emergency department with severe right upper quadrant pain. A CT scan was performed and revealed gangrenous cholecystitis with likely cholecystoduodenal fistulous communication.After discussion with the patient and the HPB team, the plan was made to attempt endoscopic extraction of the obstructing stone. This would be performed in the operating room, such that if endoscopic extraction was not possible, surgical management would proceed.During the endoscopy, 1 L of liquid material was suctioned and the retained solids were cleared as best as possible. The large obstructing stone was then seen in the duodenal cap. In the cap, we could appreciate the obstructing stone and the fistulous tract.We then passed a guidewire distal to the stone and advanced a 15- to 20-mm extraction balloon over the guidewire. The balloon was passed distal to the stone and inflated to 20 mm. We then applied firm, steady traction in an attempt to extract the stone.With the double-channel gastroscope, we passed a second wire and extraction balloon distal to the stone to increase the amount of traction that could be applied. Both balloons were inflated distal to the stone, and steady, firm traction was again applied. Unfortunately, this was not successful either.We then decided to use a regular ERCP needle knife to incise the stone. Because the knife was delicate, it was easily deformable, so we decided to switch to a triangle-tip knife.Using the "PreciseSECT" mode on the electrosurgical unit, the stone was repeatedly incised. Particular care was taken to avoid flinging the knife and damaging the duodenal wall.Saline was used as the irrigation solution to ensure electrosurgical conductivity when the current was applied.At this point, we could appreciate fragmentation of the stones after repeated incision.After about 3 hours of stone incision and fragmentation, the guidewire was passed beyond the stone; the extraction balloon was advanced over the wire; and the balloon was again inflated with steady traction applied. This time, the stone was successfully extracted from the stomach.The duodenum was then examined. There were no remaining large pieces of stone or any significant mucosal damage or perforation.Using a mechanical lithotripter, the remaining larger fragments of stone were fragmented and extracted. However, because the stone had a large diameter, lithotripsy at the center was not initially possible, and the smaller lateral aspects had to be performed until the stone was completely fragmented.This case demonstrates the incision and fragmentation of a massive gallstone with the use of an endoscopic submucosal dissection knife and electrosurgical unit.With cautious application of this technique, successful endoscopic management of a large gallstone causing Bouveret syndrome was achieved. This technique avoided open surgical management and allowed for elective cholecystectomy at a later date with less morbidity.
| S-EPMC10862063 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background & aimsEndoscopic resection is an important component of the endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic resection can be performed by cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (cEMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We compared the histologic outcomes of ESD vs cEMR, followed by ablation.MethodsWe queried a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing cEMR and ESD followed by ablation at our institution from January 2006 to March 2020 and abstracted relevant demographic and clinical data. Our primary outcomes included the rate of complete remission of dysplasia (CRD): absence of dysplasia on surveillance histology, and complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM): absence of intestinal metaplasia. Our secondary outcome included complication rates.ResultsWe included 537 patients in the study: 456 underwent cEMR and 81 underwent ESD. The cumulative probabilities of CRD at 2 years were 75.8% and 85.6% in the cEMR and ESD groups, respectively (P < .01). Independent predictors of CRD were as follows: ESD (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; P < .01) and shorter BE segment length (HR, 1.11; P < .01). The cumulative probabilities of CRIM at 2 years were 59.3% and 50.6% in the cEMR and ESD groups, respectively (P > .05). The only independent predictor of CRIM was a shorter BE segment (HR, 1.16; P < .01).ConclusionsBE patients with dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma undergoing ESD reach CRD at higher rates than those treated with cEMR, although CRIM rates at 2 years and complication rates were similar between the 2 groups.
| S-EPMC8128933 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background/aimsIn order to reduce the procedure time and the number of accessory changes during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), we developed a novel versatile knife, which has the combined advantages of several conventional knives. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and histological quality of ESD performed using this novel versatile knife and a combination of several conventional knives.MethodsThis was an in vivo animal study comparing two different modalities of ESD in mini-pigs. Completion time of each resection was documented, and the resected specimens were retrieved and evaluated for completeness. To assess the quality control of the procedures and adverse events, detailed histopathological examinations were performed.ResultsA total of 18 specimens were dissected by ESD safely and easily (nine specimens using the new versatile knife; nine specimens by mixing conventional knives). All resections were completed as en bloc resections. There was no significant difference in procedure time between the 2 modalities (456 seconds vs. 355 seconds, p=0.258) and cutting speed (1.983 mm(2)/sec vs. 1.57 mm(2)/sec, p=1.000). The rate of adverse events and histological quality did not statistically differ between the modalities.ConclusionsESD with a versatile knife appeared to be an easy, safe, and technically efficient method.
| S-EPMC4260103 | biostudies-literature