Exceptional response to immunotherapy monotherapy in a patient with an unfavorable subset of cancer of unknown primary.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Huang X
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10722074 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Exceptional response to immunotherapy monotherapy in a patient with an unfavorable subset of cancer of unknown primary.
Huang Xiangzhong X Ren Dongqing D Sun Qiulian Q Xu Xinjian X Ding Yiwen Y
Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery 20231009 12
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundCancer of unknown primary (CUP) is heterogeneous and has a wide variety of clinical presentations and a poor prognosis in most patients, with a median overall survival of only 6 months. The development of molecular profiling contributes to precision therapy, and targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) greatly promote individualized treatment.Case presentationHere, we reported a case of an unfavorable subset of CUP who had a long time of survival after the immunotherapy-prominent comprehensive treatment. A 48-year-old man presented with back pain and a cough. A diagnostic work-up showed bone marrow, multiple bones, and lymph node metastasis. Lymph node pathology implies metastatic poorly differentiated cancer. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) showed no special targets, but the tumor proportion score (TPS) of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was 80% and the tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 16.7 per million bases. After two cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg D1 plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel 200 mg D1&8 (q3w), PET-CT and bone marrow aspiration cytology showed a complete response (CR). Subsequently, pembrolizumab alone was used for three months. The left inguinal lymph nodes showed new metastasis. After two cycles of the combination treatment of pembrolizumab and (nab)-paclitaxel, a partial response (PR) was achieved. After seven months, retroperitoneal lymph nodes showed new metastasis, and the sequential treatment with radiotherapy and pembrolizumab exhibited encouraging efficacy. To date, the patient has survived nearly 40 months with the combination therapy.ConclusionsThe ICI-prominent comprehensive treatment provided clinical benefit for the reported case of CUP. Thus, CUP patients with markers of benefiting from immunotherapy should be actively treated with immunotherapy to improve their prognosis.
| S-EPMC9256999 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe clinical utility and prognostic impact of presumed primary breast or ovarian cancer among patients with an unfavorable subset of cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the presumed primary site of CUP and the clinical outcome of site-specific therapy based on such presumptions.MethodsPatients referred to our center who were diagnosed with unfavorable-subset CUP and treated between April 2007 and March 2015 were enrolled in this study. Data were collected retrospectively from the hospital database and electronic medical records. Presumptive primary breast or ovarian cancer was based on histological and immunohistochemical analyses and metastatic patterns. The outcomes of patients with unfavorable-subset CUP with a putative primary site in the breast or ovary (P-CUP) and of patients with unfavorable-subset CUP, but without P-CUP (U-CUP), were assessed.ResultsA total of 780 patients were referred to our hospital with malignancy of unknown origin. Of these, 409 patients were diagnosed with CUP and 344 patients with unfavorable-subset CUP. Following clinicopathological examination, 40 (11.6%) of the 344 patients had P-CUP and the remaining 303 (88.3%) patients had U-CUP. In total, 136 patients received chemotherapy (22 with P-CUP and 114 with U-CUP). Among the 22 patients with P-CUP, three received hormonal therapy for breast cancer, and 19 received chemotherapy based on the presumed primary organ (breast, 4; ovaries, 15). Conventional platinum-based chemotherapy was administered to 105 patients with U-CUP and non-platinum drug treatment to nine patients. The objective response rates were 61.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.6-83.6) and 41.1% (95% CI: 31.8-50.4) for patients with P-CUP and U-CUP, respectively. The median overall survival durations were 50.0 months and 16.9 months (log-rank: P = 0.002) for patients with P-CUP and U-CUP, respectively. P-CUP was identified as an independent predictor of good prognosis according to multivariate analysis.ConclusionsPatients with P-CUP had higher response rates and a better prognosis compared with patients with U-CUP. It might thus be reasonable to classify this subset as a new category of CUP with a favorable prognosis.
| S-EPMC5809895 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers where a primary tissue of origin (TOO) is uncertain. Most patients with CUP have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be efficacious in some patients with CUP, but the optimal predictive biomarkers are unknown. We therefore assessed immune and genomic biomarkers as well as predicted TOO in patients with CUP, including a subset treated with ICIs.MethodsPatients with CUP were subject to gene-expression profiling (GEP) and DNA panel sequencing. Immune and stromal-related gene expression was explored by NanoString, including genes associated with immunotherapy response (IR) in other solid malignancies. ICI responsive cancer types were assigned based on Food and Drug Administration-approved indications, and either detection of a latent primary tumor or the TOO was suspected based on genomics informed pathology review. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and gene mutations were also assessed.ResultsA total of 219 patients with CUP were included, 215 assessed for TOO in a previous study, with the majority (163) receiving both RNA and DNA tests. Of GEP profiled cases, 33% (59/175) had a high IR gene-expression score. Of the DNA sequenced cases, 16% (32/203) had high TMB (>10 mutations/Mb), including two with mismatch repair deficiency. Low correlation was observed between TMB and an IR score (R=0.26, p<0.001). Among 110 CUPs with a latent primary or suspected TOO, 47% (52/110) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. More than half of the CUPs had at least one feature that may predict ICI response (high IR score, high TMB, ICI-responsive cancer type). Among patients with CUP treated with ICIs, 8/28 (29%) responded (2 complete responses and 6 partial responses). Among non-responders, 9 had stable and 11 had progressive disease. All responders had a high IR score (7/8) and/or high TMB (3/8), while most (5/8) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. These features were detected at a lower frequency in non-responders and mostly in patients with stable disease.ConclusionsA significant fraction of CUP tumors had genomic features previously associated with ICI response. High IR score was the most sensitive predictive feature of ICI response, warranting evaluation in a larger patient series.
| S-EPMC10098268 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionWe report a case of sustained complete response in unfavorable cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) successfully treated with chemotherapy combining pembrolizumab, pemetrexed and platinum.Case presentationA 66-year-old man was presented with weight loss and cough for 3 months. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) confirmed a mass in the superior anterior mediastinum and multiple enlarged mediastinal and axillary lymph nodes. Positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) showed abnormal uptake in the corresponding lesions. Histopathological analysis of the left axillary nodule revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry showed the tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 7 and thyroid transcription factor-1 and negative for cytokeratin 20. Thus, the patient was diagnosed as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of unknown primary, and treated as non-small-cell lung cancer. Additional genetic testing revealed the patient was negative for EGFR, ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization, ROS1, BRAF, and PD-L1 22C3 IHC with Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) was less than 1%. The patient received six cycles of pembrolizumab, platinum, and pemetrexed intravenously. Cisplatin was switched to carboplatin because of cisplatin nephrotoxicity in one course. PET-CT after six cycles showed all lesions disappeared; complete response was considered to have been achieved. Maintenance therapy of pembrolizumab and pemetrexed has been continued for 6 months after the induction therapies to prevent progressive disease. Complete response has been maintained.DiscussionChemotherapy with pembrolizumab, platinum and pemetrexed could be valuable for treating unfavorable CUP.ConclusionChemotherapy with pembrolizumab, platinum, and pemetrexed helped achieved sustained complete response in a patient with unfavorable CUP.
| S-EPMC7578551 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlthough recent advances in immunotherapy have transformed the treatment landscape for many anatomically defined cancers, these therapies are currently not approved for patients diagnosed with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Molecular cancer classification using gene expression profiling (GEP) assays has the potential to identify tumor type and putative primary cancers and thereby may allow consideration of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy options for a subset of patients with CUP. Herein, we evaluated and characterized the ability of a 92-gene assay (CancerTYPE ID) to provide a molecular diagnosis and identify putative tumor types that are known to be sensitive to ICI therapies in patients with CUP or uncertain diagnosis.FindingsA total of 24,426 cases from a large-scale research database of 92-gene assay clinical cases were classified, of which 9,350 (38%) were predicted to have an ICI-eligible tumor type. All ICIs with approved indications as of March 2020 were included in the analysis. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most frequent molecular diagnosis and accounted for 33% of the ICI-eligible tumor types identified and 13% of the overall reportable results. In addition to NSCLC, the assay also frequently identified urothelial carcinomas, gastric cancer, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The distributions of identified tumor types with indications for ICI therapy were similar across age and gender.ConclusionsResults suggest that molecular profiling with the 92-gene assay identifies a subset of ICI-eligible putative primary cancers in patients with CUP. We propose a treatment strategy based on available tests, including clinicopathologic features, GEP, and ICI biomarkers of response.
| S-EPMC7648339 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy comprises the first-line palliative treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancers (R/M HNSCC). The established survival advantage among responders is overshadowed by the high percentage of patients failing the standard PD-1 inhibitor-based treatments. Salvage therapies are direly needed. However, no current standards are available. We present the case of a 65-year-old patient with heavily pretreated laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma who had an exceptional response to cetuximab monotherapy following the failure of immunotherapy with the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab. We reviewed the literature for other cases of exceptional response to cetuximab, clinical studies investigating the combined or sequential administration of cetuximab and PD-1 inhibitors, and the mechanistic rationale for consideration of cetuximab as a potential salvage treatment after immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors. In addition to the specific epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitory effect, cetuximab, as an immunoglobulin G1 isotype, binds NK cells and elicits antibody-dependent cellular toxicity, triggering a domino of immunostimulatory, and immunoinhibitory effects that actually might decrease the cetuximab anticancer efficacy. However, in a tumor microenvironment exposed to previous treatment with a PD-1 inhibitor, the effects of the PD-1 inhibitor followed by cetuximab on innate and adaptative immune response appear to synergize. Specifically, persistent immune checkpoint inhibitors’ consequences may negate downstream immunosuppressive effects of cetuximab caused through PD-1/PD-L1 upregulation, making it a more potent treatment option. Besides the potential synergistic effect on antitumor immune response with previous immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy, cetuximab is the only targeted agent approved for treating R/M HNSCC, making it a most advantageous candidate for further treatment validation studies as salvage treatment post-immunotherapy.
| S-EPMC10475238 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe prognosis of unfavorable cancer of unknown primary is extremely poor. This is the first report to compared the treatment results between generations of CUP and examined prognostic factors.MethodsThis retrospective single-center cohort study enrolled 68 patients with newly diagnosed unfavorable cancer of unknown primary at Taipei Veteran General Hospital from 2017 to 2020 as study cohort and 167 patients from 2000 to 2009 as historical cohort.ResultsThe median overall survival was 4.3 months in the study cohort (95% CI, 2.7-6.2 months) and 4.5 months in the historical cohort (95% CI, 3.0-5.5 months; p = 0.858). Eleven patients in the study cohort received immunotherapy. The disease control rates were 45%. Multivariate analysis showed that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score > 1 and a C-reactive protein level > 1 correlated with poor survival. A new prognostic stratification model was constructed by using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and C-reactive protein values. The good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups had distinct median overall survival of 18.3, 7.0 and 1.2 months, respectively (area under the curve, 0.817; p < 0.001).ConclusionThe outcome of unfavorable cancer of unknown primary has not changed much over the last 20 years. The application of a new prognostic stratification model can further stratify unfavorable cancer of unknown primary.
| S-EPMC9883408 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCarcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) with a gastrointestinal profile is categorized by the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines into favorable and unfavorable subsets. Favorable CUPs benefit from site-specific chemotherapy (CT), while the optimal treatment for unfavorable CUPs is still undefined.Materials and methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study to describe outcomes of patients with CUP with a gastrointestinal profile referred to our center from January 2000 to August 2023. Favorable CUPs were defined as CK7-/CK20+/CDX2+ by immunohistochemistry, according to the ESMO definition; all other cases were considered unfavorable. The main endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line CT for advanced disease in all patients and in the unfavorable group.ResultsA total of 56 patients were included, of whom 46 (82%) had unfavorable CUPs. After a median follow-up of 43.9 months, the median overall survival (mOS) was 11.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.3-15.3 months]. At univariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal metastases and residual tumor after primary surgery were associated with a shorter OS. The median PFS (mPFS) was 6.1 months (95% CI 3.6-8.7 months). In the unfavorable CUP subgroup, the mOS was 12.6 months (95% CI 8.7-16.5 months), the mPFS was 6.1 months (95% CI 3.5-8.9 months) and none of the CT regimens used showed to portend better PFS. The most relevant altered genes included: KRAS (9/29; 31%), BRAF (1/26; 4%), NRAS (1/25; 4%), TP53 (9/23; 39%).ConclusionsCUPs with a gastrointestinal profile are characterized by poor prognosis and the absence of biomarker for treatment personalization. No CT regimen was superior in terms of PFS in patients with unfavorable CUPs.
| S-EPMC11347046 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The treatment options for cancer of unknown primary (CUP) are challenging due to the lack of knowledge about the primary sites, often resulting in a poor prognosis. The emerging next-generation sequencing (NGS) technique has provided a reliable approach to facilitate tumor primary site prediction and targetable gene alteration identification for CUP patients. In this report, we described a 63-year-old female patient who experienced recurrent CUP. NGS-based genetic profiling results revealed a pathogenic germline BRCA1 R71K mutation. Accordingly, the patient received the poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib treatment and demonstrated a favorable response to this treatment. Our case suggests that NGS holds great promise for providing improved diagnosis and treatment options to patients with CUP, warranting further clinical investigation.
| S-EPMC8636970 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is an umbrella term used to classify a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers based on the absence of an identifiable primary tumor. Clinically, CUPs are characterized by a set of distinct features comprising early metastatic dissemination in an atypical pattern, an aggressive clinical course, poor response to empiric chemotherapy and, consequently, a short life expectancy. Two opposing strategies to change the dismal prognosis for the better are pursued. On the one hand, following the traditional tissue-gnostic approach, more and more sophisticated tissue-of-origin (TOO) classifier assays are employed to push identification of the putative primary to its limits with the clear intent of allowing tumor-site specific treatment. However, robust evidence supporting its routine clinical use is still lacking, notably with two recent randomized clinical trials failing to show a patient benefit of TOO-prediction based site-specific treatment over empiric chemotherapy in CUP. On the other hand, with regards to a tissue-agnostic strategy, precision medicine approaches targeting actionable genomic alterations have already transformed the treatment for many known tumor types. Yet, an unmet need remains for well-designed clinical trials to scrutinize its potential role in CUP beyond anecdotal case reports. In the absence of practice changing results, we believe that the emphasis on finding the presumed unknown primary tumor at all costs, implicit in the term CUP, has biased recent research in the field. Focusing on the distinct clinical features shared by all CUPs, we advocate adopting the term primary metastatic cancer (PMC) to denominate a distinct cancer entity instead. In our view, PMC should be considered the archetype of metastatic disease and as such, despite accounting for a mere 2-3% of malignancies, unraveling the mechanisms at play goes beyond improving the prognosis of patients with PMC and promises to greatly enhance our understanding of the metastatic process and carcinogenesis across all cancer types.
| S-EPMC6978906 | biostudies-literature