Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Aim
Determining gastrointestinal parasites' frequency in non-human primates (NHPs) and handlers in different Brazilian institutions, and associate it with management information.Methods
Different institutions in São Paulo (A), Brasília (B), Rio de Janeiro (C), Pará (D) and Santa Catarina (E) were included in the study. Fecal samples were processed by using coproparasitological techniques; information about NHP handling and professionals' routine were collected through the use of questionnaires.Results
In total, 33.1% of 511 NHP samples were positive for parasites; the Entamoebidae Group and Strongyloides sp.-compatible eggs were the most detected protozoa and helminths, respectively. The Entamoebidae Group was mainly diagnosed in Alouatta from Institutions E and D, and was also the only parasite detected in handlers. Strongyloides-compatible eggs were mostly evident in fecal samples collected from Cebidae from Institutions B and D. Some risk factors associated with parasite infection were a high number of animals in the same enclosure and their use for research protocol purposes, whereas quarantine, a post-infection vacant period in enclosures and antiparasitic supply were categorized as protective factors against these agents' infection.Conclusions
Parasites showing different transmission routes but concomitantly circulating in NHP institutions located in different Brazilian regions were identified in the current study, with an emphasis on those presenting zoonotic potential.
SUBMITTER: Dib LV
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10745941 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Dib Laís Verdan LV Barbosa Alynne A da Silva Breno B Pissinatti Alcides A Moreira Silvia S Tavares Maria Clotilde MC Teixeira Rodrigo R da Costa André Luíz AL Muniz José Augusto JA Junglos Amauri A Hirano Zelinda Maria ZM Amendoeira Maria Regina MR
Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) 20231130 12
<h4>Aim</h4>Determining gastrointestinal parasites' frequency in non-human primates (NHPs) and handlers in different Brazilian institutions, and associate it with management information.<h4>Methods</h4>Different institutions in São Paulo (A), Brasília (B), Rio de Janeiro (C), Pará (D) and Santa Catarina (E) were included in the study. Fecal samples were processed by using coproparasitological techniques; information about NHP handling and professionals' routine were collected through the use of ...[more]